Witchcraft and Statecraft: Liberal Democracy in Africa

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Georgetown Law Journal Pub Date : 2007-08-29 DOI:10.31228/osf.io/synmx
N. Tebbe
{"title":"Witchcraft and Statecraft: Liberal Democracy in Africa","authors":"N. Tebbe","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/synmx","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article addresses the prospects of liberal democracy in non-Western societies. It focuses on South Africa, one of the newest and most admired liberal democracies, and in particular on its efforts to recognize indigenous African traditions surrounding witchcraft and related occult practices. In 2004, Parliament passed a law that purports to regulate certain occult practitioners called traditional healers. Today, lawmakers are under pressure to go further and criminalize the practice of witchcraft itself. This Article presses two arguments. First, it contends that the 2004 statute is compatible with liberal principles of equal citizenship and the rule of law. Second, it warns against outlawing witchcraft as such. Subjecting suspected sorcerers to criminal punishment based on governmental determinations of guilt that many will perceive to be unprincipled would work too much damage to individual autonomy and national unity, among other values. These arguments are designed to contribute to a wider discussion about the capacity of liberalism to respond to the global resurgence of religious traditionalism, especially in countries where traditionalists may comprise a large majority of the citizenry.","PeriodicalId":47702,"journal":{"name":"Georgetown Law Journal","volume":"419 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2007-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgetown Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/synmx","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

This Article addresses the prospects of liberal democracy in non-Western societies. It focuses on South Africa, one of the newest and most admired liberal democracies, and in particular on its efforts to recognize indigenous African traditions surrounding witchcraft and related occult practices. In 2004, Parliament passed a law that purports to regulate certain occult practitioners called traditional healers. Today, lawmakers are under pressure to go further and criminalize the practice of witchcraft itself. This Article presses two arguments. First, it contends that the 2004 statute is compatible with liberal principles of equal citizenship and the rule of law. Second, it warns against outlawing witchcraft as such. Subjecting suspected sorcerers to criminal punishment based on governmental determinations of guilt that many will perceive to be unprincipled would work too much damage to individual autonomy and national unity, among other values. These arguments are designed to contribute to a wider discussion about the capacity of liberalism to respond to the global resurgence of religious traditionalism, especially in countries where traditionalists may comprise a large majority of the citizenry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巫术与治国:非洲的自由民主
本文论述了自由民主在非西方社会的前景。它的重点是南非,一个最新的和最受尊敬的自由民主国家,特别是它的努力承认土著非洲传统的巫术和相关的神秘活动。2004年,议会通过了一项法律,旨在规范某些被称为传统治疗师的神秘从业者。今天,立法者面临着进一步将巫术行为本身定为犯罪的压力。这篇文章提出了两个论点。首先,它认为2004年的法令符合公民平等和法治的自由主义原则。其次,它警告不要取缔巫术。根据政府对巫师的罪责认定对其进行刑事处罚,许多人会认为这是无原则的,这会对个人的自主和国家的统一以及其他价值观造成太大的损害。这些论点旨在促成更广泛的讨论,即自由主义应对宗教传统主义全球复苏的能力,特别是在传统主义者可能占公民绝大多数的国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Georgetown Law Journal is headquartered at Georgetown University Law Center in Washington, D.C. and has since its inception published more than 500 issues, as well as the widely-used Annual Review of Criminal Procedure (ARCP). The Journal is currently, and always has been, run by law students.
期刊最新文献
Codifying Constitutional Norms Precedent, Three-Judge District Courts, and the Law of Democracy Privatizing Criminal Procedure The Decline of the Virginia (and American) Death Penalty Law in the Anthropocene Epoch
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1