The Decline of the Virginia (and American) Death Penalty

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Georgetown Law Journal Pub Date : 2017-04-04 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2674604
Brandon L. Garrett
{"title":"The Decline of the Virginia (and American) Death Penalty","authors":"Brandon L. Garrett","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2674604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The American death penalty is disappearing. Death sentences and executions have reached the lowest levels seen in decades. Public support for the death penalty has declined. More states have abolished the death penalty or imposed de facto moratoria. Even the states formerly most aggressive in pursuit of death sentences have seen death sentences steadily decline. Take Virginia, which has the highest rate of executions of any death penalty state, and which has executed the third highest number of prisoners since the 1970s. How times have changed. There are now two or fewer trials a year in Virginia at which a judge or jury even considers imposing the death penalty. Still more surprising, over one half of those trials in Virginia now result in a life sentence (11 of 21 cases from 2005 to present at which there was a capital sentencing hearing resulted in a life sentence). Why is this happening and in Virginia of all places? In this study of the decline in the Virginia death penalty, I examine every capital trial since 2005, a group of 21 trials, and I compare those to a group of twenty capital trials from 1996 to 2004. The law on the books has not meaningfully changed in ways that would make it harder to obtain death sentences in Virginia. However, in 2004 regional capital defense resource centers were created to handle capital cases. From 1996 to 2004, the crucial sentencing phase at which the judge or jury decided whether to impose the death penalty was typically cursory, averaging less than two days long. In the more recent trials, the average was twice that — four days — and still more striking was the increase in numbers of defense witnesses called, greater use of expert witnesses, and the added complexity of sentencing proceedings. Only seven counties have imposed death sentences in the past decade in Virginia. The changed understanding of effective mitigation, together with improved defense resources, may help explain the decline. I examine additional data from North Carolina and Florida, situating the role of other factors such as national trends in homicide rates, and conclude by describing heightened Eighth Amendment concerns with the scattered state of the American death penalty.","PeriodicalId":47702,"journal":{"name":"Georgetown Law Journal","volume":"51 1","pages":"661"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgetown Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2674604","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The American death penalty is disappearing. Death sentences and executions have reached the lowest levels seen in decades. Public support for the death penalty has declined. More states have abolished the death penalty or imposed de facto moratoria. Even the states formerly most aggressive in pursuit of death sentences have seen death sentences steadily decline. Take Virginia, which has the highest rate of executions of any death penalty state, and which has executed the third highest number of prisoners since the 1970s. How times have changed. There are now two or fewer trials a year in Virginia at which a judge or jury even considers imposing the death penalty. Still more surprising, over one half of those trials in Virginia now result in a life sentence (11 of 21 cases from 2005 to present at which there was a capital sentencing hearing resulted in a life sentence). Why is this happening and in Virginia of all places? In this study of the decline in the Virginia death penalty, I examine every capital trial since 2005, a group of 21 trials, and I compare those to a group of twenty capital trials from 1996 to 2004. The law on the books has not meaningfully changed in ways that would make it harder to obtain death sentences in Virginia. However, in 2004 regional capital defense resource centers were created to handle capital cases. From 1996 to 2004, the crucial sentencing phase at which the judge or jury decided whether to impose the death penalty was typically cursory, averaging less than two days long. In the more recent trials, the average was twice that — four days — and still more striking was the increase in numbers of defense witnesses called, greater use of expert witnesses, and the added complexity of sentencing proceedings. Only seven counties have imposed death sentences in the past decade in Virginia. The changed understanding of effective mitigation, together with improved defense resources, may help explain the decline. I examine additional data from North Carolina and Florida, situating the role of other factors such as national trends in homicide rates, and conclude by describing heightened Eighth Amendment concerns with the scattered state of the American death penalty.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弗吉尼亚(和美国)死刑的衰落
美国的死刑正在消失。死刑判决和执行已降至几十年来的最低水平。公众对死刑的支持有所下降。更多的国家废除了死刑或事实上暂停执行死刑。即使是以前最积极推行死刑的州,死刑判决也在稳步下降。以维吉尼亚州为例,该州的死刑执行率在所有实行死刑的州中最高,自20世纪70年代以来,该州处决的囚犯数量位居第三。时代变了。现在,在弗吉尼亚州,法官或陪审团甚至考虑判处死刑的案件一年只有两起或更少。更让人吃惊的是,在弗吉尼亚州,超过一半的审判结果是无期徒刑(2005年至今的21起案件中,有11起进行了死刑判决听证会,最终被判无期徒刑)。为什么偏偏发生在弗吉尼亚?在这项关于弗吉尼亚州死刑减少的研究中,我研究了2005年以来的每一次死刑审判,共21次审判,并将它们与1996年至2004年的20次死刑审判进行了比较。书本上的法律并没有做出有意义的改变,使弗吉尼亚更难获得死刑判决。但是,2004年设立了处理死刑案件的地区首都防卫资源中心。从1996年到2004年,法官或陪审团决定是否判处死刑的关键量刑阶段通常是草率的,平均不到两天。在最近的审判中,平均时间是这个数字的两倍,也就是四天。更令人吃惊的是,辩方传唤的证人数量增加了,专家证人的使用增多了,量刑程序也更加复杂了。在过去的十年里,弗吉尼亚州只有七个县判处了死刑。对有效减缓认识的改变,加上防御资源的改善,可能有助于解释这种下降。我研究了来自北卡罗来纳州和佛罗里达州的额外数据,确定了其他因素的作用,如全国杀人率的趋势,并通过描述第八修正案对美国死刑分散状态的高度关注来结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Georgetown Law Journal is headquartered at Georgetown University Law Center in Washington, D.C. and has since its inception published more than 500 issues, as well as the widely-used Annual Review of Criminal Procedure (ARCP). The Journal is currently, and always has been, run by law students.
期刊最新文献
Codifying Constitutional Norms Precedent, Three-Judge District Courts, and the Law of Democracy Privatizing Criminal Procedure The Decline of the Virginia (and American) Death Penalty Law in the Anthropocene Epoch
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1