Middle School Victims of Peer Harassment Seeking Help From Friends and Teachers :: Differences in the Quality of Help Seeking@@@—援助要請の性質の違いに着目して—

Q4 Social Sciences Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.5926/JJEP.65.167
Daiki Yamanaka, K. Hiraishi
{"title":"Middle School Victims of Peer Harassment Seeking Help From Friends and Teachers :: Differences in the Quality of Help Seeking@@@—援助要請の性質の違いに着目して—","authors":"Daiki Yamanaka, K. Hiraishi","doi":"10.5926/JJEP.65.167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present authors were unable to find any previously published research that focused on differences in the quality of help seeking and avoidance of help seeking for peer harassment. A newly developed instru-ment,the Seeking Help with Peer Harassment from Friends and Teachers Scale, which was based on 4 qualitatively different strategies (i.e.,autonomous help seeking,dependent help seeking,avoidance of help seeking,and pretending not to be harassed),was used to investigate how middle school students used these strategies to address peer harassment. Factor analysis revealed that the scale was comprised of 3 factors: autonomous help seeking,dependent help seeking,and pretending not to be harassed. Cluster analysis of the scores was used to classify the students into 6 groups. An analysis of the features of those groups suggested the following 2 possibilities:(a)there are 2 types of students:those who do not seek help and those who pretend not to be victims of peer harassment and do not seek help,and ( b)middle school students do not consistently use a particular help-seeking strategy,but rather use various strategies in parallel,depend-ing on the helper.","PeriodicalId":39981,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology","volume":"16 1","pages":"167-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5926/JJEP.65.167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present authors were unable to find any previously published research that focused on differences in the quality of help seeking and avoidance of help seeking for peer harassment. A newly developed instru-ment,the Seeking Help with Peer Harassment from Friends and Teachers Scale, which was based on 4 qualitatively different strategies (i.e.,autonomous help seeking,dependent help seeking,avoidance of help seeking,and pretending not to be harassed),was used to investigate how middle school students used these strategies to address peer harassment. Factor analysis revealed that the scale was comprised of 3 factors: autonomous help seeking,dependent help seeking,and pretending not to be harassed. Cluster analysis of the scores was used to classify the students into 6 groups. An analysis of the features of those groups suggested the following 2 possibilities:(a)there are 2 types of students:those who do not seek help and those who pretend not to be victims of peer harassment and do not seek help,and ( b)middle school students do not consistently use a particular help-seeking strategy,but rather use various strategies in parallel,depend-ing on the helper.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中学同伴骚扰受害者向朋友和老师寻求帮助:寻求帮助质量的差异@@@ -
目前的作者无法找到任何先前发表的研究,集中在寻求帮助的质量和避免寻求帮助的同伴骚扰的差异。本研究采用新开发的“同伴骚扰求助量表”,以自主求助、依赖求助、回避求助和假装不被骚扰四种不同的策略为基础,考察中学生如何使用这些策略来应对同伴骚扰。因子分析显示,量表由3个因素组成:自主求助、依赖求助和假装不受骚扰。采用聚类分析将学生分为6组。通过对这些群体特征的分析,我们发现了以下两种可能性:(a)有两种类型的学生:不寻求帮助的学生和假装不是同伴骚扰受害者的学生,他们不寻求帮助;(b)中学生并不总是使用特定的寻求帮助策略,而是根据帮助者的不同并行使用各种策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology
Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Individualized Tutoring of Reading Comprehension Through Use of Lesson Induction: Case Study of a Fourth-Grade Student 児童青年版援助要請認知尺度,援助要請スキル尺度の開発 Effects of Advanced Skills Sessions and Timing of Sub-Skills Improvement in Training: Program for Improving Teamwork Competency by Female University Students Comparison of Two Teaching Methods Aimed at Enhancing Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Generalized Mathematical Concepts: Utilization of Prior Knowledge 現職保育者の動機づけプロセスに関する包括的検討
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1