Feminist Rethinking of the Representation of African Women in Peacebuilding: A Theoretical Analysis

IF 1.2 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Gender Technology & Development Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.31920/2634-3622/2023/v12n1a9
Zainab Olaitan
{"title":"Feminist Rethinking of the Representation of African Women in Peacebuilding: A Theoretical Analysis","authors":"Zainab Olaitan","doi":"10.31920/2634-3622/2023/v12n1a9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Are women just victims in times of war and post-conflict peacebuilding? This question is a manifestation of years of research into the participation and underrepresentation of women in peacebuilding. Women’s underrepresentation in peacebuilding has been ascribed to several factors such as the patriarchal culture of most African societies, the “women-as-victims-only” narrative and the under-reporting of informal contributions women make through their participation in peacebuilding activities. Importantly, the women as-victim-only narrative which features in numerous studies is often cited as why women are not participating in post-conflict peacebuilding, thereby necessitating the opening question. Therefore, this paper used the radical feminist theory as a lens to rethink the agency that women embody during peacebuilding in a bid to argue that women are much more than victims. More specifically, it sought to examine the validity of the women-as-victims-only narrative and how it limits the representation of women in peacebuilding. By using qualitative methodology and radical feminist theoretical framework, this paper argued that women are much more than victims of war as they often participate in peace processes. The study found that women in Sierra Leone were an integral part of the peace processes, which lends credence to the notion that women are both victims of war and agents of peace.","PeriodicalId":45357,"journal":{"name":"Gender Technology & Development","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Technology & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31920/2634-3622/2023/v12n1a9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Are women just victims in times of war and post-conflict peacebuilding? This question is a manifestation of years of research into the participation and underrepresentation of women in peacebuilding. Women’s underrepresentation in peacebuilding has been ascribed to several factors such as the patriarchal culture of most African societies, the “women-as-victims-only” narrative and the under-reporting of informal contributions women make through their participation in peacebuilding activities. Importantly, the women as-victim-only narrative which features in numerous studies is often cited as why women are not participating in post-conflict peacebuilding, thereby necessitating the opening question. Therefore, this paper used the radical feminist theory as a lens to rethink the agency that women embody during peacebuilding in a bid to argue that women are much more than victims. More specifically, it sought to examine the validity of the women-as-victims-only narrative and how it limits the representation of women in peacebuilding. By using qualitative methodology and radical feminist theoretical framework, this paper argued that women are much more than victims of war as they often participate in peace processes. The study found that women in Sierra Leone were an integral part of the peace processes, which lends credence to the notion that women are both victims of war and agents of peace.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲妇女在建设和平中的代表性的女权主义反思:一个理论分析
妇女是否只是战争时期和冲突后建设和平的受害者?这个问题反映了多年来对妇女参与建设和平和代表性不足问题的研究。妇女参与建设和平的人数不足可归因于若干因素,例如大多数非洲社会的父权文化、“妇女只作为受害者”的说法以及妇女通过参与建设和平活动所作的非正式贡献报告不足。重要的是,在许多研究中,妇女是唯一受害者的叙述经常被引用为妇女不参与冲突后建设和平的原因,因此有必要提出这个问题。因此,本文以激进女权主义理论为视角,重新思考妇女在建设和平过程中所扮演的角色,试图论证妇女不仅仅是受害者。更具体地说,它试图审查妇女只作为受害者的说法是否正确,以及这种说法如何限制妇女在建设和平中的代表性。本文运用定性方法和激进女权主义的理论框架,论证了妇女不仅仅是战争的受害者,她们经常参与和平进程。研究发现,塞拉利昂的妇女是和平进程的一个组成部分,这证实了妇女既是战争的受害者又是和平促进者的观念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gender Technology & Development
Gender Technology & Development SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Gender, Technology and Development is an international, multi-disciplinary, refereed journal serving as a forum for exploring the linkages among changing gender relations, technological change and developing societies. The journal"s main focus is on the shifting boundaries and meanings of gender, technology and development, addressing transnational phenomena and engaging in dialogues that cut across geographical boundaries.
期刊最新文献
Gender exclusion in Indonesia’s community-based forest management extension program What agricultural transition means for women in male-headed households in South Asia: an in-depth exploration of intrahousehold evaluation processes Women’s (im)mobility strategies and digital platform adoption: the case study of employees doing desk work in Pune, India Women’s autonomy and old age pension transfer in South Africa Women fish vendors in Kerala, India: an analytical study of access to inputs and services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1