Speech and language therapy service provision to UK intensive care units: A national survey

Claire S. Mills, H. Newman, C. Iezzi, Anna-Liisa Sutt, Rachel Jones, Jude Sadiq, A. Ginnelly, Gemma L Jones, Sarah Wallace Obe
{"title":"Speech and language therapy service provision to UK intensive care units: A national survey","authors":"Claire S. Mills, H. Newman, C. Iezzi, Anna-Liisa Sutt, Rachel Jones, Jude Sadiq, A. Ginnelly, Gemma L Jones, Sarah Wallace Obe","doi":"10.3233/acs-220015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The role of Speech and Language Therapists (SLTs) in intensive care units (ICUs) has become increasingly recognised. This survey was developed in response to concern amongst UK SLTs that service provision was insufficient. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to benchmark and describe UK pre-pandemic SLT ICU service provision. Secondary objectives included: identifying factors which might explain differences in SLT service provision, identifying unmet needs and good practice, and informing recommended SLT staffing levels. METHODS: An online survey was distributed through UK SLT networks and social media. Quantitative data were reported descriptively, and content analysis was conducted with qualitative data. RESULTS: Responses were received from 64 hospitals, representing three paediatric services and 61 adult services. Average staffing ratios of 0.03 and 0.01 whole time equivalent (WTE) were reported for these respectively. Most services (77&) received no funding from their ICU for SLT staffing. Few reported an adequate SLT service for communication (12&), swallowing (16&) and tracheostomy weaning interventions (11&). Compliance with national guidance for SLT-led communication and swallowing input for all tracheostomised patients was achieved by 27& of sites. CONCLUSIONS: Staffing levels at many sites were insufficient to provide a consistent and responsive service. The findings contributed to a recommendation of 0.1 WTE SLT per ICU bed, which was incorporated into Edition 2 of the Guidelines for the Provision of Intensive Care Services. This survey identified barriers and facilitators to providing an adequate SLT service for critically ill patients that may assist service development initiatives and guide further research.","PeriodicalId":93726,"journal":{"name":"Advances in communication and swallowing","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in communication and swallowing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/acs-220015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of Speech and Language Therapists (SLTs) in intensive care units (ICUs) has become increasingly recognised. This survey was developed in response to concern amongst UK SLTs that service provision was insufficient. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to benchmark and describe UK pre-pandemic SLT ICU service provision. Secondary objectives included: identifying factors which might explain differences in SLT service provision, identifying unmet needs and good practice, and informing recommended SLT staffing levels. METHODS: An online survey was distributed through UK SLT networks and social media. Quantitative data were reported descriptively, and content analysis was conducted with qualitative data. RESULTS: Responses were received from 64 hospitals, representing three paediatric services and 61 adult services. Average staffing ratios of 0.03 and 0.01 whole time equivalent (WTE) were reported for these respectively. Most services (77&) received no funding from their ICU for SLT staffing. Few reported an adequate SLT service for communication (12&), swallowing (16&) and tracheostomy weaning interventions (11&). Compliance with national guidance for SLT-led communication and swallowing input for all tracheostomised patients was achieved by 27& of sites. CONCLUSIONS: Staffing levels at many sites were insufficient to provide a consistent and responsive service. The findings contributed to a recommendation of 0.1 WTE SLT per ICU bed, which was incorporated into Edition 2 of the Guidelines for the Provision of Intensive Care Services. This survey identified barriers and facilitators to providing an adequate SLT service for critically ill patients that may assist service development initiatives and guide further research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国重症监护病房的言语和语言治疗服务:一项全国性调查
背景:言语和语言治疗师(SLTs)在重症监护病房(ICUs)中的作用越来越得到认可。这项调查是为了回应英国slt对服务提供不足的担忧而开展的。目的:主要目的是基准和描述英国大流行前SLT ICU服务提供。次要目标包括:确定可能解释SLT服务提供差异的因素,确定未满足的需求和良好做法,并告知建议的SLT人员配备水平。方法:通过英国SLT网络和社交媒体进行在线调查。定量资料采用描述性报告,定性资料进行内容分析。结果:收到了来自64家医院的回复,代表3家儿科服务机构和61家成人服务机构。平均编制比率分别为0.03和0.01的全时间当量(WTE)。大多数服务(77&)没有从其ICU获得SLT人员配备的资金。很少有人报道在沟通(12&)、吞咽(16&)和气管造口术脱机干预(11&)方面有足够的SLT服务。所有气管造口患者的slt引导沟通和吞咽输入符合国家指南的比例达到27%。结论:许多地点的人员配备水平不足以提供一致和反应迅速的服务。这些发现促成了每张ICU病床0.1 WTE SLT的建议,该建议被纳入《重症监护服务提供指南》第2版。这项调查确定了为危重患者提供适当的SLT服务的障碍和促进因素,这可能有助于服务发展倡议并指导进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Speech-language pathologists’ experience with nursing initiated texture modified diets in health care settings Cough effectiveness during airway invasion in adults with oropharyngeal dysphagia: A systematic review of literature Speech and language therapy services for autistic children in Munster: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of parental experiences and expectations “You’ll find most people who got involved with the Café couldn’t do without it now” – Socialising in an online versus in-person Aphasia Café Exploring the lived experiences and perspectives of individuals with communication and swallowing difficulties associated with Long-COVID
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1