Cultural communication differences in initial public offering documentation: the case of China

Anamari Irizarry Quintero, Javier Rodríguez Ramirez, Camille Villafañe-Rodríguez
{"title":"Cultural communication differences in initial public offering documentation: the case of China","authors":"Anamari Irizarry Quintero, Javier Rodríguez Ramirez, Camille Villafañe-Rodríguez","doi":"10.1108/jefas-07-2021-0123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeWritten communication differences across cultures can set the tone for effective or disastrous business relationships. Although English has been the go-to language in business, managers from different countries can significantly differ in how they convey the firms' information. This study explored these differences by examining the documentation presented by foreign corporations as part of their initial public offering (IPO) in the USA, particularly Chinese firms.Design/methodology/approachThis work examined cultural-related differences in written communications by looking at foreign corporations' descriptions of their strengths, strategies and challenges included in F-1 documents submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as part of the IPO process. The sample consisted of 97 American depositary receipts (ADRs) identified in the Bank of New York Mellon's ADR directory from 2003 to 2015.FindingsThis study found that Chinese firms significantly differ from other countries' firms in depicting their strengths, strategies and challenges.Research limitations/implicationsLimitations have to do with the sample size. Future research may address this by considering other depositary markets, not just the USA.Originality/valueThe results will be significant for potential ADRs investors; they must be conscious of these differences in the written documentation submitted by Chinese firms compared to other foreign firms. The market should also be aware of these differences, as the Chinese seem less open to sharing information about the under spinning of their operations and financial prospects.","PeriodicalId":53491,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jefas-07-2021-0123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeWritten communication differences across cultures can set the tone for effective or disastrous business relationships. Although English has been the go-to language in business, managers from different countries can significantly differ in how they convey the firms' information. This study explored these differences by examining the documentation presented by foreign corporations as part of their initial public offering (IPO) in the USA, particularly Chinese firms.Design/methodology/approachThis work examined cultural-related differences in written communications by looking at foreign corporations' descriptions of their strengths, strategies and challenges included in F-1 documents submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as part of the IPO process. The sample consisted of 97 American depositary receipts (ADRs) identified in the Bank of New York Mellon's ADR directory from 2003 to 2015.FindingsThis study found that Chinese firms significantly differ from other countries' firms in depicting their strengths, strategies and challenges.Research limitations/implicationsLimitations have to do with the sample size. Future research may address this by considering other depositary markets, not just the USA.Originality/valueThe results will be significant for potential ADRs investors; they must be conscious of these differences in the written documentation submitted by Chinese firms compared to other foreign firms. The market should also be aware of these differences, as the Chinese seem less open to sharing information about the under spinning of their operations and financial prospects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
首次公开募股文件中的文化传播差异:以中国为例
跨文化的书面沟通差异可以为有效或灾难性的商业关系定下基调。尽管英语一直是商业中的首选语言,但来自不同国家的经理在传达公司信息的方式上存在显著差异。本研究通过考察外国公司(特别是中国公司)在美国首次公开募股(IPO)时提交的文件来探讨这些差异。设计/方法/方法本研究通过考察外国公司在首次公开募股过程中提交给美国证券交易委员会(SEC)的F-1文件中对其优势、战略和挑战的描述,研究了书面沟通中的文化相关差异。样本包括纽约梅隆银行2003年至2015年ADR目录中的97份美国存托凭证(ADR)。本研究发现,中国企业在描述自身优势、战略和挑战方面与其他国家企业存在显著差异。研究局限性/启示局限性与样本量有关。未来的研究可能会通过考虑其他存托市场来解决这个问题,而不仅仅是美国。独创性/价值研究结果对潜在的美国存托凭证投资者具有重要意义;他们必须意识到与其他外国公司相比,中国公司提交的书面文件存在这些差异。市场也应该意识到这些差异,因为中国企业似乎不太愿意分享有关其经营和财务前景的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science
Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.80%
发文量
23
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Universidad ESAN, with more than 50 years of experience in the higher education field and post graduate studies, desires to contribute to the academic community with the most outstanding pieces of research. We gratefully welcome suggestions and contributions from business areas such as operations, supply chain, economics, finance and administration. We publish twice a year, six articles for each issue.
期刊最新文献
Utility under the Dark Tetrad ESG and financial performance via uncertain mining technology: do Multilatinas contribute to the sustainability of the region? A comparative analysis of consumer credit risk models in Peer-to-Peer Lending Short-term effects of productive credit, savings and money demand on Ecuador’s economic growth, 2006–2020 Islamic banks' contribution to Indonesia districts' economic growth and poverty alleviation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1