The Institutionalization of Research Ethics Committees in Germany – International Integration or in the Shadow of Nuremberg?

M. Krischel
{"title":"The Institutionalization of Research Ethics Committees in Germany – International Integration or in the Shadow of Nuremberg?","authors":"M. Krischel","doi":"10.1163/26667711-bja10011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nAlthough already established in West Germany since the 1970s, with the introduction of research ethics committees (rec s) into the Tokyo revision of the Declaration of Helsinki, they gained in importance. From 1985, a duty to consult rec s in human subject research was written into West German physicians’ codes of conduct. In East Germany (“Deutsche Demokratische Republik”, ddr), a central rec was set up in 1981 within the ddr Ministry of Health, and after German reunification, a duty to consult rec s was introduced in the federal Medical Products Act (Arzneimittelgesetz). Since 2001, European regulations were incorporated into national laws which applied in Germany as in other member states. Regarding the institution and legal history of rec s in Germany, this contribution seeks to answer three questions: (1) Were rec s developed in response to a specifically German experience of medical crimes and the abuse of human research subjects, or were they part of an internationalization of medical research ethics and international integration of German research? (2) Was the setting up of rec s in Germany a more top-down, centralized process or a more bottom-up, grassroots undertaking, and what does this tell us about the status that biomedical researchers gave to the ethics of human subject research in that period? And (3) who has traditionally held authority over human subject research in Germany and who holds it today?","PeriodicalId":72967,"journal":{"name":"European journal for the history of medicine and health","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal for the history of medicine and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/26667711-bja10011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Although already established in West Germany since the 1970s, with the introduction of research ethics committees (rec s) into the Tokyo revision of the Declaration of Helsinki, they gained in importance. From 1985, a duty to consult rec s in human subject research was written into West German physicians’ codes of conduct. In East Germany (“Deutsche Demokratische Republik”, ddr), a central rec was set up in 1981 within the ddr Ministry of Health, and after German reunification, a duty to consult rec s was introduced in the federal Medical Products Act (Arzneimittelgesetz). Since 2001, European regulations were incorporated into national laws which applied in Germany as in other member states. Regarding the institution and legal history of rec s in Germany, this contribution seeks to answer three questions: (1) Were rec s developed in response to a specifically German experience of medical crimes and the abuse of human research subjects, or were they part of an internationalization of medical research ethics and international integration of German research? (2) Was the setting up of rec s in Germany a more top-down, centralized process or a more bottom-up, grassroots undertaking, and what does this tell us about the status that biomedical researchers gave to the ethics of human subject research in that period? And (3) who has traditionally held authority over human subject research in Germany and who holds it today?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国研究伦理委员会的制度化——国际融合还是纽伦堡的阴影?
尽管自20世纪70年代以来,研究伦理委员会已经在西德建立,但随着研究伦理委员会(rec)被引入赫尔辛基宣言的东京修订版,它们变得越来越重要。从1985年起,西德医生的行为准则中就规定了在人体实验研究中咨询医生意见的义务。在东德("德意志民主共和国"),1981年在德意志民主共和国卫生部内设立了一个中央委员会,两德统一后,联邦《医疗产品法》(Arzneimittelgesetz)规定了咨询委员会的义务。自2001年以来,欧洲法规被纳入国家法律,适用于德国和其他成员国。关于德国医学研究的制度和法律历史,这篇文章试图回答三个问题:(1)医学研究是针对德国医学犯罪和滥用人类研究对象的具体经验而发展起来的,还是医学研究伦理国际化和德国研究国际一体化的一部分?(2)在德国建立rec是一个自上而下的、集中的过程,还是一个自下而上的、基层的事业,这告诉我们在那个时期生物医学研究者对人体受试者研究伦理的地位是什么?(3)在德国,谁传统上拥有人体实验研究的权威,今天又由谁掌握?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disease Prevention in a Communist State and the Second Epidemiological Transition: The Case of Post-war Poland The Great Plague Scare of 1720: Disaster and Diplomacy in the Eighteenth-Century Atlantic World, written by Cindy Ermus Poor, Sick, and Mad: Treating the Mentally Ill in the Hungarian Hospitals of the Brothers of Mercy (1740–1830) Diabetes. Eine Wissensgeschichte der modernen Medizin 1900–1960, written by Oliver Falk Expanding Mindscapes: A Global History of Psychedelics, edited by Erika Dyck and Chris Elcock
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1