Planned Plunder, the British Museum, and the 1868 Maqdala Expedition

Lucia Patrizio Gunning, D. Challis
{"title":"Planned Plunder, the British Museum, and the 1868 Maqdala Expedition","authors":"Lucia Patrizio Gunning, D. Challis","doi":"10.1017/S0018246X2200036X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In 1863, Emperor Tewodros II of Abyssinia (present-day Ethiopia and Eritrea) took a British consul hostage; five years later, the British sent a punitive expedition. This military expedition continued the brutal tradition of earlier ones and shaped later campaigns in Sudan and West Africa in the 1890s. Typically, a large contingent of non-military personnel accompanied these expeditions and the 1868 expedition to Maqdala was no different. What was unique for Maqdala was the inclusion of a member of staff from the British Museum. We argue that a letter from Charles Thomas Newton, keeper of the Department of Greek and Roman Antiquities, to Sir Roderick Murchison, the president of the Royal Geographical Society (RGS), illustrates that the plunder of cultural heritage was planned. We also argue that the plunder did not go to plan. The inclusion of a man from the museum made this expedition unique in the museum's history. The acquisition of these objects through colonial violence constitutes a strong moral reason for their repatriation from the British Museum and the numerous institutions in which they are dispersed. Understanding the planning involved in their plunder illustrates the entanglement of politics and imperialism with scientific and cultural institutions that constituted the backbone of Victorian Britain.","PeriodicalId":40620,"journal":{"name":"Ajalooline Ajakiri-The Estonian Historical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ajalooline Ajakiri-The Estonian Historical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X2200036X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In 1863, Emperor Tewodros II of Abyssinia (present-day Ethiopia and Eritrea) took a British consul hostage; five years later, the British sent a punitive expedition. This military expedition continued the brutal tradition of earlier ones and shaped later campaigns in Sudan and West Africa in the 1890s. Typically, a large contingent of non-military personnel accompanied these expeditions and the 1868 expedition to Maqdala was no different. What was unique for Maqdala was the inclusion of a member of staff from the British Museum. We argue that a letter from Charles Thomas Newton, keeper of the Department of Greek and Roman Antiquities, to Sir Roderick Murchison, the president of the Royal Geographical Society (RGS), illustrates that the plunder of cultural heritage was planned. We also argue that the plunder did not go to plan. The inclusion of a man from the museum made this expedition unique in the museum's history. The acquisition of these objects through colonial violence constitutes a strong moral reason for their repatriation from the British Museum and the numerous institutions in which they are dispersed. Understanding the planning involved in their plunder illustrates the entanglement of politics and imperialism with scientific and cultural institutions that constituted the backbone of Victorian Britain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计划掠夺,大英博物馆,以及1868年的麦达拉远征
1863年,阿比西尼亚(今埃塞俄比亚和厄立特里亚)皇帝特沃德罗斯二世劫持了一名英国领事;五年后,英国派出了一支惩罚性的远征队。这次军事远征延续了早期的野蛮传统,并影响了后来19世纪90年代在苏丹和西非的战役。通常情况下,这些远征会有大量非军事人员陪同,1868年对Maqdala的远征也不例外。麦达拉的独特之处在于,他邀请了一位来自大英博物馆的工作人员。我们认为,希腊和罗马古物部负责人查尔斯·托马斯·牛顿写给皇家地理学会(RGS)主席罗德里克·默奇森爵士的一封信表明,掠夺文化遗产是有计划的。我们也认为劫掠没有按计划进行。博物馆的一个人的加入使这次探险在博物馆的历史上独一无二。这些物品是通过殖民暴力获得的,这是将它们从大英博物馆和众多分散存放这些物品的机构遣返的一个强有力的道德理由。了解他们掠夺所涉及的计划说明了政治和帝国主义与构成维多利亚时代英国支柱的科学和文化机构之间的纠缠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: “Ajalooline Ajakiri. The Estonian Historical Journal” is peer-reviewed academic journal of the Institute of History and Archaeology, University of Tartu. It accepts articles in Estonian, English or German. It is open to submissions from all parts of the world and on all fields of history, but articles, reviews and communications on the history of the Baltic region are preferred.
期刊最新文献
English Travel Writers’ Representations of Freedom in the United Provinces, c. 1670–1795 Reassessing the Marginalization of Astrology in the Early Modern World Toll Disputes, Grain Marketing, and Economic Culture in England, c. 1550–1800 William Munro Tapp: Colonial Investor and Caius College Philanthropist, 1925–1937 Alsace in Algeria and the Notion of ‘Failure’ in Settler Political Culture, c. 1870–1960
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1