Comparative Study of Erbium Laser Versus A Chemo-Mechanical Caries Removal Method in Primary Teeth

Rana Salem, Mervat I. Fawzy, M. Mostafa
{"title":"Comparative Study of Erbium Laser Versus A Chemo-Mechanical Caries Removal Method in Primary Teeth","authors":"Rana Salem, Mervat I. Fawzy, M. Mostafa","doi":"10.21608/adjg.2021.20987.1207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the caries removal using Er,Cr:YSGG laser and Papacarie chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR) method in primary teeth. Materials and Methods: Patients (4 – 8 years old) having 40 carious primary molars with dentin involvement were selected for this study. Caries was removed using two methods; Group 1 (Laser) Waterlase MD turbo Er,Cr:YSGG Laser using Quartz tips (MZ – 8) on the Gold handpiece and group 2 (CMCR) Papacarie Duo gel. Final restoration was done by Riva light cure Glass ionomer. Caries removal was assessed clinically by tactile and visual method (Ericson criteria). Time taken for the procedure was measured in minutes. Evaluation of pain perception was done using the Wong-Baker facial image. Microbiological evaluation was done by collecting dentin samples from the carious primary tooth before and after caries removal and total bacterial count was assessed. The restoration was evaluated using the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) at baseline, three months, six months and nine months. Results: The two groups showed a statistically significant difference (unpaired t test) in the time of treatment, Pain score and total bacterial count. Clinical evaluation of the restoration using the modified USPHS criteria showed no statistical significance between the two groups. Conclusion: Chemo-mechanical caries removal methods and laser irradiation are effective and efficient techniques for caries removal in children with high patient acceptance and no adverse effects.","PeriodicalId":7493,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjg.2021.20987.1207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the caries removal using Er,Cr:YSGG laser and Papacarie chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR) method in primary teeth. Materials and Methods: Patients (4 – 8 years old) having 40 carious primary molars with dentin involvement were selected for this study. Caries was removed using two methods; Group 1 (Laser) Waterlase MD turbo Er,Cr:YSGG Laser using Quartz tips (MZ – 8) on the Gold handpiece and group 2 (CMCR) Papacarie Duo gel. Final restoration was done by Riva light cure Glass ionomer. Caries removal was assessed clinically by tactile and visual method (Ericson criteria). Time taken for the procedure was measured in minutes. Evaluation of pain perception was done using the Wong-Baker facial image. Microbiological evaluation was done by collecting dentin samples from the carious primary tooth before and after caries removal and total bacterial count was assessed. The restoration was evaluated using the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) at baseline, three months, six months and nine months. Results: The two groups showed a statistically significant difference (unpaired t test) in the time of treatment, Pain score and total bacterial count. Clinical evaluation of the restoration using the modified USPHS criteria showed no statistical significance between the two groups. Conclusion: Chemo-mechanical caries removal methods and laser irradiation are effective and efficient techniques for caries removal in children with high patient acceptance and no adverse effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
铒激光与化学机械除龋法在乳牙中的比较研究
目的:评价Er、Cr:YSGG激光和Papacarie化学机械除龋法(CMCR)对乳牙的除龋效果。材料与方法:选择年龄在4 ~ 8岁的40例原发磨牙伴牙本质受累的龋齿患者作为研究对象。采用两种方法除龋;第1组(激光)Waterlase MD涡轮Er,Cr:YSGG激光使用石英尖端(MZ - 8)在黄金机头和第2组(CMCR) Papacarie Duo凝胶。最终修复由Riva光固化玻璃离子剂完成。临床采用触觉和视觉法(Ericson标准)评估龋的清除情况。这个过程所花费的时间以分钟计算。疼痛感知评估采用Wong-Baker面部图像。微生物学评估是通过在龋齿去除前后收集龋齿的牙本质样本进行的,并评估细菌总数。使用美国公共卫生服务(USPHS)在基线、3个月、6个月和9个月时评估修复情况。结果:两组患者治疗时间、疼痛评分、细菌总数比较,差异均有统计学意义(无配对t检验)。采用改良的USPHS标准对修复体进行临床评价,两组间无统计学意义。结论:化学机械联合激光治疗是治疗儿童龋的有效方法,患者接受度高,无不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Aloe vera in Treatment of Experimentally Induced Oral Lichenoid Reaction Evaluation of Local Versus Intravenous Administration of Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells on Regeneration of Oral Epithelium of Chemotherapy Treated Rats The Influence of Different Implant Abutment Sizes on Fracture Resistance of Two Monolithic Ceramic Crown Systems Effect of Irradiation with 980-nm Diode Laser on the Microhardness of Young and Old Root Canal Dentin after Treatment with Chemical Solutions Evaluation of Occlusal Pressure Pattern and Dimensional Changes of the Lined Dentures Subjected to Microwave Disinfection Protocol
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1