Surveying the Methodological and Analytical Foundations of the New Institutional Economics: A Critical Comparison with Neoclassical and (Old) Institutional Economics

Giorgos Meramveliotakis
{"title":"Surveying the Methodological and Analytical Foundations of the New Institutional Economics: A Critical Comparison with Neoclassical and (Old) Institutional Economics","authors":"Giorgos Meramveliotakis","doi":"10.15458/ebr109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to review the methodological and analytical foundations of the New Institutional Economics by implying a critical comparison with the Neoclassical and (old) Institutional Economics. After a discussion of the fundamental definitions and concepts of the New Institutional Economics, I turn to the critical comparison with other schools of thought. It is shown that the New Institutional Economics does not break fundamentally from the neoclassical economics. To the contrary, it can be fairly argued that the New Institutional Economics is a research program which is developed within and around the dominant neoclassical paradigm. On the other hand, it is argued that the Old and New Institutional Economics constitute two distinct approaches to the analysis of institutions, stemming from different paradigmatic viewpoints that produce and nurture contrasting perspectives on how to theoretically tackle institutions. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.15458/ebr109","PeriodicalId":30292,"journal":{"name":"Economic and Business Review","volume":"216 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic and Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15458/ebr109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to review the methodological and analytical foundations of the New Institutional Economics by implying a critical comparison with the Neoclassical and (old) Institutional Economics. After a discussion of the fundamental definitions and concepts of the New Institutional Economics, I turn to the critical comparison with other schools of thought. It is shown that the New Institutional Economics does not break fundamentally from the neoclassical economics. To the contrary, it can be fairly argued that the New Institutional Economics is a research program which is developed within and around the dominant neoclassical paradigm. On the other hand, it is argued that the Old and New Institutional Economics constitute two distinct approaches to the analysis of institutions, stemming from different paradigmatic viewpoints that produce and nurture contrasting perspectives on how to theoretically tackle institutions. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.15458/ebr109
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考察新制度经济学的方法论和分析基础:与新古典和(旧)制度经济学的批判性比较
本文的目的是通过与新古典和(旧)制度经济学的批判性比较来回顾新制度经济学的方法论和分析基础。在讨论了新制度经济学的基本定义和概念之后,我转向与其他思想流派的批判性比较。新制度经济学并没有从根本上脱离新古典经济学。相反,我们可以公平地认为,新制度经济学是一个在占主导地位的新古典范式内部和周围发展起来的研究项目。另一方面,有人认为,新旧制度经济学构成了两种不同的制度分析方法,源于不同的范式观点,这些观点产生并培育了关于如何从理论上解决制度问题的不同观点。DOI: https://doi.org/10.15458/ebr109
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Relationship between Culture, Sustainable Use of Resources, and Financial Performance: An Institutional and Natural-Resource-Based Perspective Firm-Level, Macroeconomic, and Institutional Determinants of Firm Growth: Evidence From Europe A Systematic Literature Review on Overconfidence and Related Biases Influencing Investment Decision Making Implementing the Single Supervisory Mechanism in the Euro Area: Effects on Deposit Structure of Banks Revisiting the Nexus Between Job Insecurity and Employee Task Performance: Examining the Influence of Self-Efficacy and Emotional Intelligence in a Mediation–Moderation Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1