Extended interval dosing of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis

L. Z. Ryerson, T. Frohman, J. Foley, I. Kister, B. Weinstock-Guttman, C. Tornatore, K. Pandey, S. Donnelly, S. Pawate, R. Bomprezzi, David C. Smith, C. Kolb, S. Qureshi, D. Okuda, J. Kalina, Z. Rimler, R. Green, N. Monson, T. Hoyt, M. Bradshaw, J. Fallon, E. Chamot, M. Bucello, Shin C. Beh, Gary Cutter, E. Major, J. Herbert, E. Frohman
{"title":"Extended interval dosing of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis","authors":"L. Z. Ryerson, T. Frohman, J. Foley, I. Kister, B. Weinstock-Guttman, C. Tornatore, K. Pandey, S. Donnelly, S. Pawate, R. Bomprezzi, David C. Smith, C. Kolb, S. Qureshi, D. Okuda, J. Kalina, Z. Rimler, R. Green, N. Monson, T. Hoyt, M. Bradshaw, J. Fallon, E. Chamot, M. Bucello, Shin C. Beh, Gary Cutter, E. Major, J. Herbert, E. Frohman","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2015-312940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Natalizumab (NTZ), a monoclonal antibody to human α4β1/β7 integrin, is an effective therapy for multiple sclerosis (MS), albeit associated with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Clinicians have been extending the dose of infusions with a hypothesis of reducing PML risk. The aim of the study is to evaluate the clinical consequences of reducing NTZ frequency of infusion up to 8 weeks 5 days. Methods A retrospective chart review in 9 MS centres was performed in order to identify patients treated with extended interval dosing (EID) regimens of NTZ. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on EID NTZ treatment schedule in individual centres: early extended dosing (EED; n=249) every 4 weeks 3 days to 6 weeks 6 days; late extended dosing (LED; n=274) every 7 weeks to 8 weeks 5 days; variable extended dosing (n=382) alternating between EED and LED. These groups were compared with patients on standard interval dosing (SID; n=1093) every 4 weeks. Results 17% of patients on SID had new T2 lesions compared with 14% in EID (p=0.02); 7% of patients had enhancing T1 lesions in SID compared with 9% in EID (p=0.08); annualised relapse rate was 0.14 in the SID group, and 0.09 in the EID group. No evidence of clinical or radiographic disease activity was observed in 62% of SID and 61% of EID patients (p=0.83). No cases of PML were observed in EID group compared with 4 cases in SID cohort. Conclusions Dosing intervals up to 8 weeks 5 days did not diminish effectiveness of NTZ therapy. Further monitoring is ongoing to evaluate if the risk of PML is reduced in patients on EID.","PeriodicalId":16509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry","volume":"272 1","pages":"885 - 889"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"119","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2015-312940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 119

Abstract

Background Natalizumab (NTZ), a monoclonal antibody to human α4β1/β7 integrin, is an effective therapy for multiple sclerosis (MS), albeit associated with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Clinicians have been extending the dose of infusions with a hypothesis of reducing PML risk. The aim of the study is to evaluate the clinical consequences of reducing NTZ frequency of infusion up to 8 weeks 5 days. Methods A retrospective chart review in 9 MS centres was performed in order to identify patients treated with extended interval dosing (EID) regimens of NTZ. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on EID NTZ treatment schedule in individual centres: early extended dosing (EED; n=249) every 4 weeks 3 days to 6 weeks 6 days; late extended dosing (LED; n=274) every 7 weeks to 8 weeks 5 days; variable extended dosing (n=382) alternating between EED and LED. These groups were compared with patients on standard interval dosing (SID; n=1093) every 4 weeks. Results 17% of patients on SID had new T2 lesions compared with 14% in EID (p=0.02); 7% of patients had enhancing T1 lesions in SID compared with 9% in EID (p=0.08); annualised relapse rate was 0.14 in the SID group, and 0.09 in the EID group. No evidence of clinical or radiographic disease activity was observed in 62% of SID and 61% of EID patients (p=0.83). No cases of PML were observed in EID group compared with 4 cases in SID cohort. Conclusions Dosing intervals up to 8 weeks 5 days did not diminish effectiveness of NTZ therapy. Further monitoring is ongoing to evaluate if the risk of PML is reduced in patients on EID.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
延长纳他珠单抗在多发性硬化症中的间隔剂量
Natalizumab (NTZ)是一种针对人α4β1/β7整合素的单克隆抗体,尽管与进行性多灶性白质脑病(PML)相关,但仍是多发性硬化症(MS)的有效治疗药物。临床医生一直在延长输注剂量,假设可以降低PML的风险。该研究的目的是评估减少NTZ输注频率至8周5天的临床后果。方法回顾性分析9个MS中心的病历,以确定接受NTZ延长间隔给药(EID)方案治疗的患者。根据个别中心的EID NTZ治疗方案,将患者分为3组:早期延长给药(EED);N =249)每4周3天至6周6天;延迟延长加药(LED;N =274)每7周至8周5天;可变延长剂量(n=382)在EED和LED之间交替。将这些组进行标准间隔给药(SID;N =1093)每4周。结果SID组有17%的患者有新的T2病变,EID组有14% (p=0.02);7%的SID患者有T1增强病变,9%的EID患者有T1增强病变(p=0.08);SID组的年复发率为0.14,EID组为0.09。62%的SID患者和61%的EID患者未观察到临床或影像学疾病活动的证据(p=0.83)。EID组无PML病例,SID组4例。结论8周5天的给药间隔并未降低NTZ治疗的有效性。正在进行进一步监测,以评估EID患者PML的风险是否降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WED 253 An atypical presentation of sneddon syndrome H29 Practical tools and transfer aids in daily care for clients with advanced hd F06 When and how does manifest hd begin? a comparison of age at onset of motor and non-motor symptoms F33 Task-switching abilities in pre-manifest huntington’s disease subjects F56 Psychiatric symptoms in huntington’s disease: relationship to disease stage in the CAPIT-HD2 beta-testing study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1