Charitable assets: social outcomes, financial values, and the new, nonprofit funding regime

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES Journal of Cultural Economy Pub Date : 2023-04-10 DOI:10.1080/17530350.2023.2186918
James W. Williams
{"title":"Charitable assets: social outcomes, financial values, and the new, nonprofit funding regime","authors":"James W. Williams","doi":"10.1080/17530350.2023.2186918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Amidst growing signs of inequality, poverty, and marginalization, there have been calls for a new approach to funding the social sector organizations tasked with addressing these challenges. Rather than paying for services, governments and philanthropists are being encouraged to fund programs based on their ‘outcomes.’ This paper explores this growing movement around ‘outcomes-based funding’ (OBF) suggesting that outcomes in this context embody a distinctly financial logic and reflect an effort to turn the work of charities and nonprofits into a type of pseudo asset. The paper teases out these dynamics and their implications based on one particular form of OBF, the social impact bond, a financial instrument which uses private capital to fund social programs and calculates returns based on program outcomes. While SIBs have struggled as a market, the operations underlying these projects and informing the production of outcomes as investable assets have been carried forward into non-SIB work informing flows of public and philanthropic capital and embodying the practices of the larger OBF ecosystem. As a window into the new, outcomes-based nonprofit funding regime, the paper offers a unique lens and set of critical tools for exploring the relationship between capital, the social sector, and poverty governance.","PeriodicalId":46876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Economy","volume":"82 1","pages":"513 - 528"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cultural Economy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2023.2186918","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Amidst growing signs of inequality, poverty, and marginalization, there have been calls for a new approach to funding the social sector organizations tasked with addressing these challenges. Rather than paying for services, governments and philanthropists are being encouraged to fund programs based on their ‘outcomes.’ This paper explores this growing movement around ‘outcomes-based funding’ (OBF) suggesting that outcomes in this context embody a distinctly financial logic and reflect an effort to turn the work of charities and nonprofits into a type of pseudo asset. The paper teases out these dynamics and their implications based on one particular form of OBF, the social impact bond, a financial instrument which uses private capital to fund social programs and calculates returns based on program outcomes. While SIBs have struggled as a market, the operations underlying these projects and informing the production of outcomes as investable assets have been carried forward into non-SIB work informing flows of public and philanthropic capital and embodying the practices of the larger OBF ecosystem. As a window into the new, outcomes-based nonprofit funding regime, the paper offers a unique lens and set of critical tools for exploring the relationship between capital, the social sector, and poverty governance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慈善资产:社会成果、财务价值和新的非营利资助机制
在不平等、贫困和边缘化现象日益严重的情况下,人们呼吁采取新的方式为社会部门组织提供资金,以应对这些挑战。政府和慈善家被鼓励根据项目的成果来资助项目,而不是为服务付费。本文探讨了围绕“基于结果的资助”(OBF)这一日益增长的运动,认为在这种背景下,结果体现了一种明显的金融逻辑,反映了将慈善机构和非营利组织的工作转变为一种伪资产的努力。本文基于OBF的一种特殊形式——社会影响债券——梳理出了这些动态及其含义。社会影响债券是一种金融工具,利用私人资本为社会项目提供资金,并根据项目结果计算回报。虽然sib作为一个市场一直在挣扎,但这些项目背后的运作和作为可投资资产的产出信息已被转移到非sib工作中,为公共和慈善资本的流动提供信息,并体现了更大的OBF生态系统的实践。作为一扇通往新的、以结果为基础的非营利资助机制的窗口,本文为探索资本、社会部门和贫困治理之间的关系提供了独特的视角和一套关键工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.80%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
Digital (mis)trust: ethnographic encounters with computational forms. The politics of climate risk: How the climate issue is turned into a risk issue through the little tools and operations of finance Algorithms and the Assault on Critical Thought: Digitalized Dilemmas of Automated Governance and Communitarian Practice Interventions and dissonance in industrial research: dressing the emperor in new clothes? ‘I’m not going to feed the bailiffs’: personal bankruptcy and debtor agency in narrative accounts of struggling debtors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1