Content, Physical Appearance, Copy Condition - Tagging Customer Book Reviews

T. Jug, M. Zumer
{"title":"Content, Physical Appearance, Copy Condition - Tagging Customer Book Reviews","authors":"T. Jug, M. Zumer","doi":"10.18452/1449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Users of online bookstores are not interested only in general book description when searching and buying books, but also in subjective reader opinion, which could be found in online reviews. Reviewers usually comment on book content, but may also mention other aspects of the received book, such as binding, illustrations, translation etc. Meanwhile buyers are not always interested in the same aspect of a book, especially when they need it for a special purpose. Currently, obtaining non-content book information from reviews is difficult, therefore it would be reasonable to rethink their presentation and organization. In our study, we used an interview and a task solving method to determine whether social tagging could be an appropriate aid for this purpose. The results show that free tagging offers insight into users’ vocabulary but is not optimal for online review presentation. Nevertheless, it represents a good basis for creation of categories that describe books on different levels of abstraction and could be used as a filtering tool, which would select only those reviews containing the aspects of a book a buyer is interested in.","PeriodicalId":90875,"journal":{"name":"ISI ... : ... IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics. IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics","volume":"9 1","pages":"110-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISI ... : ... IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics. IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18452/1449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Users of online bookstores are not interested only in general book description when searching and buying books, but also in subjective reader opinion, which could be found in online reviews. Reviewers usually comment on book content, but may also mention other aspects of the received book, such as binding, illustrations, translation etc. Meanwhile buyers are not always interested in the same aspect of a book, especially when they need it for a special purpose. Currently, obtaining non-content book information from reviews is difficult, therefore it would be reasonable to rethink their presentation and organization. In our study, we used an interview and a task solving method to determine whether social tagging could be an appropriate aid for this purpose. The results show that free tagging offers insight into users’ vocabulary but is not optimal for online review presentation. Nevertheless, it represents a good basis for creation of categories that describe books on different levels of abstraction and could be used as a filtering tool, which would select only those reviews containing the aspects of a book a buyer is interested in.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内容,物理外观,拷贝条件-标记客户书评
网上书店的用户在搜索和购买图书时,不仅对一般的图书描述感兴趣,而且还对读者的主观意见感兴趣,这可以在网上评论中找到。审稿人通常会评论书的内容,但也可能会提到收到的书的其他方面,如装订、插图、翻译等。同时,购买者并不总是对一本书的同一方面感兴趣,尤其是当他们出于特殊目的需要这本书时。目前,从评论中获取非内容的图书信息是困难的,因此重新考虑它们的表示和组织是合理的。在我们的研究中,我们使用了访谈和任务解决方法来确定社会标签是否可以作为这一目的的适当援助。结果表明,免费标签提供了对用户词汇表的洞察,但对于在线评论的呈现并不是最优的。然而,它代表了一个很好的基础,用于创建在不同抽象层次上描述书籍的类别,并且可以用作过滤工具,它将只选择那些包含购买者感兴趣的书籍方面的评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Open Practices of Early Career Researchers: A Qualitative Study on Research and Teaching Behavior Design and Development of an Emoji Sentiment Lexicon Does the General Public Share Research on Twitter? A Case Study on the Online Conversation about the Search for a Nuclear Repository in Germany Vom Datenkatalog zum Wissensgraph - Forschungsdaten im konzeptuellen Modell von FRBR Omission of Information: Identifying Political Slant via an Analysis of Co-occurring Entities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1