A decision tree prediction model for a short-term outcome of delirium in patients with advanced cancer receiving pharmacological interventions: A secondary analysis of a multicenter and prospective observational study (Phase-R)

Ken Kurisu, S. Inada, Isseki Maeda, A. Ogawa, S. Iwase, T. Akechi, T. Morita, S. Oyamada, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, Kengo Imai, Rika Nakahara, Keisuke Kaneishi, N. Nakajima, M. Sumitani, K. Yoshiuchi
{"title":"A decision tree prediction model for a short-term outcome of delirium in patients with advanced cancer receiving pharmacological interventions: A secondary analysis of a multicenter and prospective observational study (Phase-R)","authors":"Ken Kurisu, S. Inada, Isseki Maeda, A. Ogawa, S. Iwase, T. Akechi, T. Morita, S. Oyamada, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, Kengo Imai, Rika Nakahara, Keisuke Kaneishi, N. Nakajima, M. Sumitani, K. Yoshiuchi","doi":"10.1017/S1478951521001565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective There is no widely used prognostic model for delirium in patients with advanced cancer. The present study aimed to develop a decision tree prediction model for a short-term outcome. Method This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter and prospective observational study conducted at 9 psycho-oncology consultation services and 14 inpatient palliative care units in Japan. We used records of patients with advanced cancer receiving pharmacological interventions with a baseline Delirium Rating Scale Revised-98 (DRS-R98) severity score of ≥10. A DRS-R98 severity score of <10 on day 3 was defined as the study outcome. The dataset was randomly split into the training and test dataset. A decision tree model was developed using the training dataset and potential predictors. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve was measured both in 5-fold cross-validation and in the independent test dataset. Finally, the model was visualized using the whole dataset. Results Altogether, 668 records were included, of which 141 had a DRS-R98 severity score of <10 on day 3. The model achieved an average AUC of 0.698 in 5-fold cross-validation and 0.718 (95% confidence interval, 0.627–0.810) in the test dataset. The baseline DRS-R98 severity score (cutoff of 15), hypoxia, and dehydration were the important predictors, in this order. Significance of results We developed an easy-to-use prediction model for the short-term outcome of delirium in patients with advanced cancer receiving pharmacological interventions. The baseline severity of delirium and precipitating factors of delirium were important for prediction.","PeriodicalId":19953,"journal":{"name":"Palliative and Supportive Care","volume":"86 1","pages":"153 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative and Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951521001565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Objective There is no widely used prognostic model for delirium in patients with advanced cancer. The present study aimed to develop a decision tree prediction model for a short-term outcome. Method This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter and prospective observational study conducted at 9 psycho-oncology consultation services and 14 inpatient palliative care units in Japan. We used records of patients with advanced cancer receiving pharmacological interventions with a baseline Delirium Rating Scale Revised-98 (DRS-R98) severity score of ≥10. A DRS-R98 severity score of <10 on day 3 was defined as the study outcome. The dataset was randomly split into the training and test dataset. A decision tree model was developed using the training dataset and potential predictors. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve was measured both in 5-fold cross-validation and in the independent test dataset. Finally, the model was visualized using the whole dataset. Results Altogether, 668 records were included, of which 141 had a DRS-R98 severity score of <10 on day 3. The model achieved an average AUC of 0.698 in 5-fold cross-validation and 0.718 (95% confidence interval, 0.627–0.810) in the test dataset. The baseline DRS-R98 severity score (cutoff of 15), hypoxia, and dehydration were the important predictors, in this order. Significance of results We developed an easy-to-use prediction model for the short-term outcome of delirium in patients with advanced cancer receiving pharmacological interventions. The baseline severity of delirium and precipitating factors of delirium were important for prediction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受药物干预的晚期癌症患者谵妄短期预后的决策树预测模型:一项多中心前瞻性观察性研究的二次分析(r期)
目的晚期癌症患者谵妄的预后模型尚未得到广泛应用。本研究旨在建立一个短期结果的决策树预测模型。方法:本研究是对日本9家心理肿瘤咨询机构和14家姑息治疗住院单位开展的一项多中心前瞻性观察性研究的二次分析。我们使用基线谵妄评定量表修订-98 (DRS-R98)严重程度评分≥10分的晚期癌症患者接受药物干预的记录。第3天DRS-R98严重程度评分<10分定义为研究结果。数据集随机分为训练数据集和测试数据集。利用训练数据集和潜在预测因子建立了决策树模型。在5倍交叉验证和独立测试数据集中测量受试者工作特征曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)。最后,利用整个数据集对模型进行可视化处理。结果共纳入668例患者,其中第3天DRS-R98严重程度评分<10的患者141例。该模型在5倍交叉验证中平均AUC为0.698,在测试数据集中平均AUC为0.718(95%置信区间为0.627-0.810)。基线DRS-R98严重程度评分(临界值为15)、缺氧和脱水是重要的预测因子。我们开发了一个易于使用的预测模型,用于晚期癌症患者接受药物干预后谵妄的短期预后。谵妄的基线严重程度和谵妄的诱发因素对预测很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Examining public stigma and expectations of grief following medical aid and dying in the US: A vignette-based experiment. Bedbound. Shores of acceptance Light of the setting sun PAX volume 20 issue 6 Cover and Front matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1