{"title":"Konstantin Krylov’s Ethical Theory and What It Reveals about the Propensity for Conflict between Russia and the West","authors":"P. Grenier","doi":"10.3817/1222201109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Decline of Liberalism From the perspective of the Russian political philosopher Konstantin Krylov, Russia’s civilizational order is not liberal—in most respects, it is the very opposite of liberal. At the same time, Russia has, over the course of centuries, failed to properly come into its own as its own civilizational type. From Peter the Great to Vladimir Putin, Russia has lingered in a stunted, oversimplified version of its own “Northern” national idea even as it has repeatedly taken up, like children playing at dress-up, the civilizational ideas of others. Like much of the rest of the world, Russia at present is playing at liberalism.1 Writing in the late 1990s (the reader is urged to keep in mind that Krylov’s theory was formulated and put on paper not today but twenty-five years ago), Krylov predicted that Russia’s dalliance with liberalism would play itself out within a decade or so and that by about 2030 Russia would finally come into its own as a civilization of the “Northern” type. What Krylov means by this is something we will get to in due course.","PeriodicalId":43573,"journal":{"name":"Telos","volume":"1 1","pages":"109 - 125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telos","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3817/1222201109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The Decline of Liberalism From the perspective of the Russian political philosopher Konstantin Krylov, Russia’s civilizational order is not liberal—in most respects, it is the very opposite of liberal. At the same time, Russia has, over the course of centuries, failed to properly come into its own as its own civilizational type. From Peter the Great to Vladimir Putin, Russia has lingered in a stunted, oversimplified version of its own “Northern” national idea even as it has repeatedly taken up, like children playing at dress-up, the civilizational ideas of others. Like much of the rest of the world, Russia at present is playing at liberalism.1 Writing in the late 1990s (the reader is urged to keep in mind that Krylov’s theory was formulated and put on paper not today but twenty-five years ago), Krylov predicted that Russia’s dalliance with liberalism would play itself out within a decade or so and that by about 2030 Russia would finally come into its own as a civilization of the “Northern” type. What Krylov means by this is something we will get to in due course.
从俄罗斯政治哲学家克里洛夫的观点来看,俄罗斯的文明秩序不是自由主义的——在大多数方面,它是自由主义的反面。与此同时,几个世纪以来,俄罗斯一直未能形成自己的文明类型。从彼得大帝(Peter the Great)到弗拉基米尔•普京(Vladimir Putin),俄罗斯一直徘徊在自己的“北方”国家理念的一个发育迟缓、过于简化的版本中,尽管它像孩子们玩化妆游戏一样,一再接受其他国家的文明理念。和世界上许多其他国家一样,俄罗斯目前也在玩弄自由主义此书写于20世纪90年代末(请读者记住,克里洛夫的理论是在25年前形成并发表在纸上的,而不是今天),克里洛夫预言,俄罗斯与自由主义的暧昧关系将在10年左右的时间内结束,到2030年左右,俄罗斯将最终形成自己的“北方”型文明。克里洛夫的意思是,我们会在适当的时候讲到。