Konstantin Krylov’s Ethical Theory and What It Reveals about the Propensity for Conflict between Russia and the West

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 PHILOSOPHY Telos Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3817/1222201109
P. Grenier
{"title":"Konstantin Krylov’s Ethical Theory and What It Reveals about the Propensity for Conflict between Russia and the West","authors":"P. Grenier","doi":"10.3817/1222201109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Decline of Liberalism From the perspective of the Russian political philosopher Konstantin Krylov, Russia’s civilizational order is not liberal—in most respects, it is the very opposite of liberal. At the same time, Russia has, over the course of centuries, failed to properly come into its own as its own civilizational type. From Peter the Great to Vladimir Putin, Russia has lingered in a stunted, oversimplified version of its own “Northern” national idea even as it has repeatedly taken up, like children playing at dress-up, the civilizational ideas of others. Like much of the rest of the world, Russia at present is playing at liberalism.1 Writing in the late 1990s (the reader is urged to keep in mind that Krylov’s theory was formulated and put on paper not today but twenty-five years ago), Krylov predicted that Russia’s dalliance with liberalism would play itself out within a decade or so and that by about 2030 Russia would finally come into its own as a civilization of the “Northern” type. What Krylov means by this is something we will get to in due course.","PeriodicalId":43573,"journal":{"name":"Telos","volume":"1 1","pages":"109 - 125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telos","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3817/1222201109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Decline of Liberalism From the perspective of the Russian political philosopher Konstantin Krylov, Russia’s civilizational order is not liberal—in most respects, it is the very opposite of liberal. At the same time, Russia has, over the course of centuries, failed to properly come into its own as its own civilizational type. From Peter the Great to Vladimir Putin, Russia has lingered in a stunted, oversimplified version of its own “Northern” national idea even as it has repeatedly taken up, like children playing at dress-up, the civilizational ideas of others. Like much of the rest of the world, Russia at present is playing at liberalism.1 Writing in the late 1990s (the reader is urged to keep in mind that Krylov’s theory was formulated and put on paper not today but twenty-five years ago), Krylov predicted that Russia’s dalliance with liberalism would play itself out within a decade or so and that by about 2030 Russia would finally come into its own as a civilization of the “Northern” type. What Krylov means by this is something we will get to in due course.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克里洛夫的伦理理论及其对俄罗斯与西方冲突倾向的启示
从俄罗斯政治哲学家克里洛夫的观点来看,俄罗斯的文明秩序不是自由主义的——在大多数方面,它是自由主义的反面。与此同时,几个世纪以来,俄罗斯一直未能形成自己的文明类型。从彼得大帝(Peter the Great)到弗拉基米尔•普京(Vladimir Putin),俄罗斯一直徘徊在自己的“北方”国家理念的一个发育迟缓、过于简化的版本中,尽管它像孩子们玩化妆游戏一样,一再接受其他国家的文明理念。和世界上许多其他国家一样,俄罗斯目前也在玩弄自由主义此书写于20世纪90年代末(请读者记住,克里洛夫的理论是在25年前形成并发表在纸上的,而不是今天),克里洛夫预言,俄罗斯与自由主义的暧昧关系将在10年左右的时间内结束,到2030年左右,俄罗斯将最终形成自己的“北方”型文明。克里洛夫的意思是,我们会在适当的时候讲到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Telos
Telos Multiple-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
The Early Christian Origins of Secularization Nationality of Food: Cultural Politics on the UNESCO List of Intangible Cultural Heritage and Food Museums Horizontality vs. Verticality: New Readings in the Understanding of Religion and the Organizing of Politics In Memoriam: Fred Siegel Islam and the Promotion of Human Rights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1