Classification of mountain soils in a subalpine zone – a case study from the Bieszczady Mountains (SE Poland)

IF 1.4 Q4 SOIL SCIENCE Soil Science Annual Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI:10.2478/ssa-2019-0015
Łukasz Musielok, Marek Drewnik, W. Szymański, Mateusz Stolarczyk
{"title":"Classification of mountain soils in a subalpine zone – a case study from the Bieszczady Mountains (SE Poland)","authors":"Łukasz Musielok, Marek Drewnik, W. Szymański, Mateusz Stolarczyk","doi":"10.2478/ssa-2019-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of the study was to test the suitability of the 6th edition of Polish Soil Classification (SGP6) in reflecting the typical features of subalpine Bieszczady Mts. soils in comparison with the 5th edition of Polish Soil Classification (SGP5) and the newest version of World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB). Five soil profiles located in differentiated in terms of the parent material, topography and vegetation conditions of the natural environment were investigated. On the basis of described morphology and determined properties soils were classified according to different soil classifications. All soils under study were featured by presence of thick A horizons and high content of soil organic carbon accumulated even very deep in the profiles. Some of the mineral topsoil layers were classified as umbric/umbrik horizons. Moreover cambic/kambik horizons were present and in some cases also weak redoximorphic features occurred. The SGP6 enabled to distinguish soils with a thick, organic carbon-rich A horizons as umbrisols, a newly created subtype of grey soils. Furthermore, the soil taxonomic position according to SGP6 was more detailed in relation to the soil trophic status (in case of brown soils) and occurrence of weak redoximorphic features. That was reflected in number of subtypes to which analyzed soils were classified – 4 in SGP6 vs 2 in SGP5.","PeriodicalId":44772,"journal":{"name":"Soil Science Annual","volume":"1 1","pages":"170 - 177"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Science Annual","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ssa-2019-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The aim of the study was to test the suitability of the 6th edition of Polish Soil Classification (SGP6) in reflecting the typical features of subalpine Bieszczady Mts. soils in comparison with the 5th edition of Polish Soil Classification (SGP5) and the newest version of World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB). Five soil profiles located in differentiated in terms of the parent material, topography and vegetation conditions of the natural environment were investigated. On the basis of described morphology and determined properties soils were classified according to different soil classifications. All soils under study were featured by presence of thick A horizons and high content of soil organic carbon accumulated even very deep in the profiles. Some of the mineral topsoil layers were classified as umbric/umbrik horizons. Moreover cambic/kambik horizons were present and in some cases also weak redoximorphic features occurred. The SGP6 enabled to distinguish soils with a thick, organic carbon-rich A horizons as umbrisols, a newly created subtype of grey soils. Furthermore, the soil taxonomic position according to SGP6 was more detailed in relation to the soil trophic status (in case of brown soils) and occurrence of weak redoximorphic features. That was reflected in number of subtypes to which analyzed soils were classified – 4 in SGP6 vs 2 in SGP5.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚高山地区山地土壤的分类——以波兰东南部比耶什恰迪山脉为例
摘要本研究旨在比较第6版波兰土壤分类(SGP6)与第5版波兰土壤分类(SGP5)和最新版世界土壤资源参考库(WRB)在反映别什恰迪亚高山土壤典型特征方面的适用性。研究了自然环境中不同母质、地形和植被条件的5种土壤剖面。在描述土壤形态和确定土壤性质的基础上,对不同类型的土壤进行分类。所有土壤均具有A层较厚的特点,且剖面深层土壤有机碳含量较高。部分矿物表土层被划分为砂质层/砂质层。此外,还存在cambic/kambik层,在某些情况下还出现了弱的氧化变质特征。SGP6能够将具有厚的、有机碳丰富的a层的土壤区分为覆盖层,这是一种新创建的灰色土壤亚型。此外,根据SGP6划分的土壤分类位置与土壤营养状况(棕壤)和弱氧化同质特征的关系更为详细。这反映在分析土壤分类的亚型数量上——SGP6为4,SGP5为2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Science Annual
Soil Science Annual SOIL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: Soil Science Annual journal is a continuation of the “Roczniki Gleboznawcze” – the journal of the Polish Society of Soil Science first published in 1950. Soil Science Annual is a quarterly devoted to a broad spectrum of issues relating to the soil environment. From 2012, the journal is published in the open access system by the Sciendo (De Gruyter).
期刊最新文献
The influence of geological formations on soil characteristics and quality in the southeast region of Pacitan Regency, Indonesia Study on the physical properties of a forest Glossic Retisol developed from loess in the Lublin Upland, SE Poland Luvisols as a habitat for larch stands: a case study from the Miechowska Upland, S Poland Application of portable colorimeter for identification of mollic horizon and mollic-based soil groups Evaluating potential of municipal sewage sludge for agricultural use
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1