Characterization and Comparison of Outcrop and Subsurface Unconventional Shale Samples

Yan Jin, G. Jin, Shujath Ali Syed, M. Jin, S. R. Hussaini
{"title":"Characterization and Comparison of Outcrop and Subsurface Unconventional Shale Samples","authors":"Yan Jin, G. Jin, Shujath Ali Syed, M. Jin, S. R. Hussaini","doi":"10.2118/194709-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Subsurface unconventional shale samples are always scarce. Outcrop analogs are often used as an alternative to enhance the understanding of the corresponding reservoir formation. One assumption is usually made that rock composition and properties between the outcrop and subsurface samples remain the same or similar, despite differences in their burial and diagenetic histories. This paper presents a comparative case study to investigate the similarities and differences in rock properties between outcrop and subsurface samples from the same formation.\n Two subsurface and two outcrop samples from the Lower Silurian Longmaxi formation in Sichuan Basin of China were characterized to determine their mineralogical, geochemical, petrophysical, elastic and mechanical properties. Micro-CT images showed that one subsurface sample was drilled normal to the bedding, while other three samples were parallel to the bedding. Two subsurface samples differ in their mineralogy – the horizontal sample is clay-dominant, while the other one is predominantly comprise of quartz, dolomite and calcite minerals, very similar to two outcrop samples. All four samples are thermally immature and their Tmax is less than 435 °C. Subsurface samples have the highest TOC of 3.75% but relatively lower HI and OI. Other pyrolysis parameters are very similar between subsurface and outcrop samples. All samples have very low porosity of less than 2.5% and permeability of less than 9 nD, although subsurface samples have a relatively higher value.\n The discrepancy in mineralogical composition, especially the clay content, results in different elastic and mechanical behavior of outcrop and subsurface samples. The subsurface sample is highly anisotropic in both compressional and shear wave anisotropy due to the large amount of clay minerals, while one outcrop sample exhibits the strong shear wave anisotropy only and the other one is almost isotropic. Subsurface samples have lower values of Young's modulus, peak stress, Mohr-Coulomb failure parameters and unconfined compressive strength than outcrop samples.","PeriodicalId":11031,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, March 21, 2019","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, March 21, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/194709-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Subsurface unconventional shale samples are always scarce. Outcrop analogs are often used as an alternative to enhance the understanding of the corresponding reservoir formation. One assumption is usually made that rock composition and properties between the outcrop and subsurface samples remain the same or similar, despite differences in their burial and diagenetic histories. This paper presents a comparative case study to investigate the similarities and differences in rock properties between outcrop and subsurface samples from the same formation. Two subsurface and two outcrop samples from the Lower Silurian Longmaxi formation in Sichuan Basin of China were characterized to determine their mineralogical, geochemical, petrophysical, elastic and mechanical properties. Micro-CT images showed that one subsurface sample was drilled normal to the bedding, while other three samples were parallel to the bedding. Two subsurface samples differ in their mineralogy – the horizontal sample is clay-dominant, while the other one is predominantly comprise of quartz, dolomite and calcite minerals, very similar to two outcrop samples. All four samples are thermally immature and their Tmax is less than 435 °C. Subsurface samples have the highest TOC of 3.75% but relatively lower HI and OI. Other pyrolysis parameters are very similar between subsurface and outcrop samples. All samples have very low porosity of less than 2.5% and permeability of less than 9 nD, although subsurface samples have a relatively higher value. The discrepancy in mineralogical composition, especially the clay content, results in different elastic and mechanical behavior of outcrop and subsurface samples. The subsurface sample is highly anisotropic in both compressional and shear wave anisotropy due to the large amount of clay minerals, while one outcrop sample exhibits the strong shear wave anisotropy only and the other one is almost isotropic. Subsurface samples have lower values of Young's modulus, peak stress, Mohr-Coulomb failure parameters and unconfined compressive strength than outcrop samples.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
露头与地下非常规页岩样品的表征与比较
地下非常规页岩样品总是稀缺的。露头类似物通常被用作增强对相应储层形成的理解的替代方法。一种假设通常是,尽管在埋藏和成岩历史上存在差异,但露头和地下样品的岩石成分和性质保持相同或相似。本文通过对比研究,探讨了同一地层露头样品与地下样品在岩石性质上的异同。对四川盆地下志留统龙马溪组2个地下和2个露头样品进行了矿物学、地球化学、岩石物理、弹性和力学性质的研究。显微ct图像显示,1个地下样品与层理垂直,其余3个样品与层理平行。两个地下样品的矿物学不同——水平样品以粘土为主,而另一个主要由石英、白云石和方解石矿物组成,与两个露头样品非常相似。四种样品均为热未成熟,Tmax均小于435℃。地下样品TOC最高,为3.75%,HI和OI相对较低。其他热解参数在地下和露头样品之间非常相似。所有样品的孔隙度都很低,小于2.5%,渗透率小于9nd,但地下样品的孔隙度相对较高。矿物组成,特别是粘土含量的差异,导致露头和地下样品的弹性和力学行为不同。由于含有大量粘土矿物,地下样品在纵波各向异性和横波各向异性方面均表现出高度的各向异性,而露头样品仅表现出较强的横波各向异性,而另一个样品几乎各向同性。地下试样的杨氏模量、峰值应力、莫尔-库仑破坏参数和无侧限抗压强度均低于露头试样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Size distribution analysis of microstickies treated by enzyme mixtures in papermaking whitewater Evaluating hardness and the S-test Controllable anisotropic properties of wet-laid hydroentangled nonwovens A study of the softness of household tissues using a tissue softness analyzer and hand-felt panels A REVIEW OF MULTI HOMING AND ITS ASSOCIATED RESEARCH AREAS ALONG WITH INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1