Morphosyntactic isoglosses in Indo-European: An introduction

IF 0.5 4区 文学 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1515/psicl-2020-0012
Artemij Keidan, L. Kulikov, N. Lavidas
{"title":"Morphosyntactic isoglosses in Indo-European: An introduction","authors":"Artemij Keidan, L. Kulikov, N. Lavidas","doi":"10.1515/psicl-2020-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The last decades are marked with an increasing interest towards the study of isoglosses shared by some branches of the Indo-European language family. As is well-known, next to well-established branches such as Germanic, Greek or Indo-Iranian, there are larger subdivisions within Indo-European, grouping together several branches, in accordance with a number of features, traditionally called isoglosses. Such features are shared by more than one group, or by several languages which do not belong to the same group (branch-crossing isoglosses). Such isoglosses have always been at the focus of vivid debates in Indo-European scholarship, giving rise to numerous hypotheses on early splits within Proto-Indo-European or, on the contrary, later contacts among historically attested languages. A systematic research of these issues still remains a desideratum. Next to a few notorious isoglosses, almost exclusively limited to the phonological level, such as the kentum/satəm division,1 or the ‘ruki’ division (retraction of the sibilant s), which have been known for about a century, there are a few less studied morpho-syntactic features, often of a much vaguer nature, that equally group together a number of branches and/or languages. One","PeriodicalId":43804,"journal":{"name":"Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2020-0012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The last decades are marked with an increasing interest towards the study of isoglosses shared by some branches of the Indo-European language family. As is well-known, next to well-established branches such as Germanic, Greek or Indo-Iranian, there are larger subdivisions within Indo-European, grouping together several branches, in accordance with a number of features, traditionally called isoglosses. Such features are shared by more than one group, or by several languages which do not belong to the same group (branch-crossing isoglosses). Such isoglosses have always been at the focus of vivid debates in Indo-European scholarship, giving rise to numerous hypotheses on early splits within Proto-Indo-European or, on the contrary, later contacts among historically attested languages. A systematic research of these issues still remains a desideratum. Next to a few notorious isoglosses, almost exclusively limited to the phonological level, such as the kentum/satəm division,1 or the ‘ruki’ division (retraction of the sibilant s), which have been known for about a century, there are a few less studied morpho-syntactic features, often of a much vaguer nature, that equally group together a number of branches and/or languages. One
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印欧语的形态句法同源:导论
在过去的几十年里,人们对研究印欧语系的一些分支所共有的同音损失越来越感兴趣。众所周知,除了日耳曼语、希腊语或印度-伊朗语等成熟的分支外,印欧语中还有更大的分支,根据许多特征将几个分支组合在一起,传统上称为同格损失。这些特征为不止一个语系所共有,或者为不属于同一语系的几种语言所共有(分支交叉等音损失)。在印欧语系的学术研究中,这样的同音损失一直是激烈争论的焦点,对原始印欧语系内部的早期分裂提出了许多假设,或者相反,对历史上证实的语言之间后来的接触提出了许多假设。对这些问题进行系统的研究仍然是一种需要。除了几个臭名昭著的几乎完全局限于音韵学层面的同音异音,比如kentum/sat / m音1或ruki音(音节s的缩回音),它们已经被发现了大约一个世纪。除此之外,还有一些较少被研究的形态句法特征,通常性质模糊得多,它们同样将许多分支和/或语言归为一类。一个
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The syntactic variety and semantic unity of the V de resultative construction in Mandarin Chinese A multi-dimensional analysis of corporate blogs Metaphors across cultures Complexity trade-off in morphosyntactic module: suggestions from Japanese dialects A survey of Polish ASR speech datasets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1