Have We Seen Enough Traces? (T)

Hila Cohen, S. Maoz
{"title":"Have We Seen Enough Traces? (T)","authors":"Hila Cohen, S. Maoz","doi":"10.1109/ASE.2015.62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dynamic specification mining extracts candidate specifications from logs of execution traces. Existing algorithms differ in the kinds of traces they take as input and in the kinds of candidate specification they present as output. One challenge common to all approaches relates to the faithfulness of the mining results: how can we be confident that the extracted specifications faithfully characterize the program we investigate? Since producing and analyzing traces is costly, how would we know we have seen enough traces? And, how would we know we have not wasted resources and seen too many of them?In this paper we address these important questions by presenting a novel, black box, probabilistic framework based on a notion of log completeness, and by applying it to three different well-known specification mining algorithms from the literature: k-Tails, Synoptic, and mining of scenario-based triggers and effects. Extensive evaluation over 24 models taken from 9 different sources shows the soundness, generalizability, and usefulness of the framework and its contribution to the state-of-the-art in dynamic specification mining.","PeriodicalId":6586,"journal":{"name":"2015 30th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)","volume":"2 1","pages":"93-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 30th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2015.62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Dynamic specification mining extracts candidate specifications from logs of execution traces. Existing algorithms differ in the kinds of traces they take as input and in the kinds of candidate specification they present as output. One challenge common to all approaches relates to the faithfulness of the mining results: how can we be confident that the extracted specifications faithfully characterize the program we investigate? Since producing and analyzing traces is costly, how would we know we have seen enough traces? And, how would we know we have not wasted resources and seen too many of them?In this paper we address these important questions by presenting a novel, black box, probabilistic framework based on a notion of log completeness, and by applying it to three different well-known specification mining algorithms from the literature: k-Tails, Synoptic, and mining of scenario-based triggers and effects. Extensive evaluation over 24 models taken from 9 different sources shows the soundness, generalizability, and usefulness of the framework and its contribution to the state-of-the-art in dynamic specification mining.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们发现了足够多的痕迹吗?(T)
动态规范挖掘从执行跟踪日志中提取候选规范。现有算法的不同之处在于它们作为输入的跟踪类型和它们作为输出呈现的候选规范类型。所有方法共同面临的一个挑战与挖掘结果的准确性有关:我们如何确信提取的规范忠实地描述了我们调查的程序?既然产生和分析痕迹是昂贵的,我们怎么知道我们已经看到了足够的痕迹呢?而且,我们怎么知道我们没有浪费资源,没有看到太多资源?在本文中,我们通过提出一个基于日志完整性概念的新颖的黑箱概率框架来解决这些重要问题,并将其应用于文献中三种不同的知名规范挖掘算法:k- tail, Synoptic和基于场景的触发器和效果的挖掘。对来自9个不同来源的24个模型进行了广泛的评估,显示了该框架的稳健性、通用性和实用性,以及它对动态规范挖掘的最新贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost-Efficient Sampling for Performance Prediction of Configurable Systems (T) Refactorings for Android Asynchronous Programming Study and Refactoring of Android Asynchronous Programming (T) The iMPAcT Tool: Testing UI Patterns on Mobile Applications Combining Deep Learning with Information Retrieval to Localize Buggy Files for Bug Reports (N)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1