Cesarean Scar Defect (Niche) Risk Factors: A Prospective Study on Indonesian Women

IF 0.3 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Current Women s Health Reviews Pub Date : 2023-08-21 DOI:10.2174/1573404820666230821101739
I. L. Lumbanraja, D. Aldiansyah, B. Halim, M. P. Lubis, Y. B. Kaban, R. Rivany
{"title":"Cesarean Scar Defect (Niche) Risk Factors: A Prospective Study on Indonesian Women","authors":"I. L. Lumbanraja, D. Aldiansyah, B. Halim, M. P. Lubis, Y. B. Kaban, R. Rivany","doi":"10.2174/1573404820666230821101739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nNiche or cesarean scar defect is a complication of a cesarean section that has\nlong-term implications for both obstetrics and gynecology. The rate of niche is believed to be increasing\nwith the high number of cesarean sections. This study assesses the risk factors for niche development\nafter cesarean section.\n\n\n\nA prospective cohort study was conducted on women who underwent cesarean section at\nthe Haji Adam Malik General Hospital Medan between August 2020 and August 2022. Niche was assessed\nsix weeks after cesarean section using transvaginal ultrasonography. The primary outcome was\nthe presence of a niche. The antepartum, intrapartum and postpartum risk factors were analyzed for\nniche development. A logistic regression model was used to assess independent risk factors from the\nbivariate analysis.\n\n\n\nThere were 280 patients enrolled in this study. The prevalence of niche was 44.3% by using\ntransvaginal ultrasound. There was no significant relationship between maternal age, gestational age,\nparity, nutritional status based on upper arm circumference, hypertension in pregnancy, anemia status,\nsurgical indications, duration of surgery, volume blood loss, and puerperal infection to niche development\n(P > 0.05). The independent risk factors for niche development were Cervical dilatation > 4\ncm (P = 0.035; RR = 1.75), locking suture technique (P = 0.015; RR = 13.81), non-closure vesicouterine\nfolds (P = 0.04; RR = 0.14) and a retroflexed uterus (P = 0.001; RR = 0.039).\n\n\n\nCervical dilatation > 4 cm, locking suture technique, non-closure vesicouterine folds, and\na retroflexed uterus are risk factors for niche development after CS.\n","PeriodicalId":11030,"journal":{"name":"Current Women s Health Reviews","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Women s Health Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404820666230821101739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Niche or cesarean scar defect is a complication of a cesarean section that has long-term implications for both obstetrics and gynecology. The rate of niche is believed to be increasing with the high number of cesarean sections. This study assesses the risk factors for niche development after cesarean section. A prospective cohort study was conducted on women who underwent cesarean section at the Haji Adam Malik General Hospital Medan between August 2020 and August 2022. Niche was assessed six weeks after cesarean section using transvaginal ultrasonography. The primary outcome was the presence of a niche. The antepartum, intrapartum and postpartum risk factors were analyzed for niche development. A logistic regression model was used to assess independent risk factors from the bivariate analysis. There were 280 patients enrolled in this study. The prevalence of niche was 44.3% by using transvaginal ultrasound. There was no significant relationship between maternal age, gestational age, parity, nutritional status based on upper arm circumference, hypertension in pregnancy, anemia status, surgical indications, duration of surgery, volume blood loss, and puerperal infection to niche development (P > 0.05). The independent risk factors for niche development were Cervical dilatation > 4 cm (P = 0.035; RR = 1.75), locking suture technique (P = 0.015; RR = 13.81), non-closure vesicouterine folds (P = 0.04; RR = 0.14) and a retroflexed uterus (P = 0.001; RR = 0.039). Cervical dilatation > 4 cm, locking suture technique, non-closure vesicouterine folds, and a retroflexed uterus are risk factors for niche development after CS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖宫产瘢痕缺损(小生境)危险因素:印度尼西亚妇女的前瞻性研究
剖宫产瘢痕缺损是剖宫产术后的一种并发症,对产科和妇科都有长期的影响。据信,随着剖宫产手术的增多,小生境的比例也在上升。本研究评估剖宫产术后生态位发育的危险因素。对2020年8月至2022年8月期间在棉兰哈吉亚当马利克综合医院接受剖宫产手术的妇女进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。剖宫产术后6周采用经阴道超声检查评估生态位。主要结果是出现了一个利基市场。分析产前、产时及产后的危险因素,以促进生态位发育。采用logistic回归模型从双变量分析中评估独立危险因素。共有280名患者参加了这项研究。经阴道超声检查,小生境检出率为44.3%。产妇年龄、胎龄、胎次、上臂围营养状况、妊娠期高血压、贫血状况、手术指征、手术时间、出血量、产褥期感染与生态位发育无显著关系(P > 0.05)。宫颈扩张> 4cm (P = 0.035;RR = 1.75)、锁定缝合技术(P = 0.015;RR = 13.81),非闭合性膀胱外褶皱(P = 0.04;RR = 0.14)和子宫后屈(P = 0.001;Rr = 0.039)。宫颈扩张> 4cm、锁闭缝合技术、膀胱外线褶皱不闭合、子宫后屈是宫内切术后小生境发育的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Women s Health Reviews
Current Women s Health Reviews OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Current Women"s Health Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances on obstetrics and gynecology. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology.
期刊最新文献
Treatment of Menopausal Symptoms with Herbal Medicines: A Review Menstrual Cup Awareness and Future Usage Possibilities of Consumers: A Cross-sectional Study Comparison of the Effectiveness of Endometrial Scratching in Follicular and Luteal Phases in Pregnancy Rate of Frozen Embryo Transfer Candidate Women Marital Satisfaction in Postpartum Women: The Role of Personality, Body Image Satisfaction, Anxiety, and Sexual Function A Complex Condition; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): A Review of its Recent Advanced Treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1