Designing and Developing a Questionnaire to Evaluate the Lighting of the Working Environments of Hospitals

M. Karimi, M. Shafiee Motlagh, R. Golmohammadi, M. Aliabadi, M. Farhadian
{"title":"Designing and Developing a Questionnaire to Evaluate the Lighting of the Working Environments of Hospitals","authors":"M. Karimi, M. Shafiee Motlagh, R. Golmohammadi, M. Aliabadi, M. Farhadian","doi":"10.52547/j.health.13.4.590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & objectives: Lighting is one of the most critical environmental factors affecting visual comfort, sleep quality, occupational accidents, and musculoskeletal disorders. This study aimed to design and develop a tool for the subjective assessment of lighting in hospital workplaces. Methods: This study was conducted on 180 hospital personnel in Iran. First, the existing questionnaires were reviewed, and questions were collected as a questionnaire. This questionnaire consisted of 7 main sections and a section entitled \"Suggestions for improving lighting\". The validity of the questionnaire was determined based on expert comments and the CVI index. Its reliability was assessed by completing the questionnaire for hospital staff. According to the North American Society of Lighting Engineers (IESNA) standard, illumination was evaluated and compared with the questionnaire results. Results: The Cronbach's alpha coefficient and CVI value of the questionnaire were estimated to be 0.901 and 0.97, respectively. The minimum and maximum local illuminances were 55.67 and 980.80 lux, respectively. There was a significant positive relationship between the mean score of the questionnaire and the illuminances in the workstations (r =0.716, P<0.001). 72.8% of the workstations had good lighting, and the results of the questionnaire evaluation in these stations showed good and excellent lighting conditions. Conclusion: The designed subjective lighting assessment questionnaire had good validity and reliability. This tool is recommended to assess and improve the lighting of the hospital working environment due to its simplicity, the inclusion of different aspects of lighting comfort, and solutions to improve the lighting system.","PeriodicalId":15954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/j.health.13.4.590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & objectives: Lighting is one of the most critical environmental factors affecting visual comfort, sleep quality, occupational accidents, and musculoskeletal disorders. This study aimed to design and develop a tool for the subjective assessment of lighting in hospital workplaces. Methods: This study was conducted on 180 hospital personnel in Iran. First, the existing questionnaires were reviewed, and questions were collected as a questionnaire. This questionnaire consisted of 7 main sections and a section entitled "Suggestions for improving lighting". The validity of the questionnaire was determined based on expert comments and the CVI index. Its reliability was assessed by completing the questionnaire for hospital staff. According to the North American Society of Lighting Engineers (IESNA) standard, illumination was evaluated and compared with the questionnaire results. Results: The Cronbach's alpha coefficient and CVI value of the questionnaire were estimated to be 0.901 and 0.97, respectively. The minimum and maximum local illuminances were 55.67 and 980.80 lux, respectively. There was a significant positive relationship between the mean score of the questionnaire and the illuminances in the workstations (r =0.716, P<0.001). 72.8% of the workstations had good lighting, and the results of the questionnaire evaluation in these stations showed good and excellent lighting conditions. Conclusion: The designed subjective lighting assessment questionnaire had good validity and reliability. This tool is recommended to assess and improve the lighting of the hospital working environment due to its simplicity, the inclusion of different aspects of lighting comfort, and solutions to improve the lighting system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设计并编制医院工作环境照明评价问卷
背景与目的:照明是影响视觉舒适、睡眠质量、职业事故和肌肉骨骼疾病的最关键的环境因素之一。本研究旨在设计和开发一种工具,用于主观评估医院工作场所的照明。方法:对伊朗180名医院工作人员进行研究。首先,对已有的问卷进行梳理,将问题收集为问卷。这份问卷由7个主要部分组成,其中一个部分名为“改善照明的建议”。根据专家意见和CVI指数确定问卷的效度。通过对医院工作人员填写问卷来评估其信度。根据北美照明工程师协会(IESNA)的标准,对照明进行评估,并与问卷调查结果进行比较。结果:问卷的Cronbach’s alpha系数和CVI值分别为0.901和0.97。局部最小照度为55.67 lux,最大照度为9800.80 lux。问卷平均得分与工作站照度呈显著正相关(r =0.716, P<0.001)。72.8%的工作站照明条件良好,调查问卷评价结果显示照明条件良好和优良。结论:设计的主观照明评价问卷具有良好的效度和信度。该工具被推荐用于评估和改善医院工作环境的照明,因为它简单,包含了照明舒适度的不同方面,以及改善照明系统的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of the Health-promoting Lifestyle Status in Nursing Students of Ardabil School of Nursing and Midwifery 2019 Designing and Developing a Questionnaire to Evaluate the Lighting of the Working Environments of Hospitals Social Predictors of DMFT Index among Adults an Iranian Population in 2016: A Cross-Sectional Study Investigating the Efficiency of Different Steps of the Most Common Method for Disinfecting Vegetables to Reduce the Microbial Population Design and Validation of a Tool to Measure Universal Health Insurance Coverage in Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1