Psychometric Qualities of the Dutch Version of the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale Adapted for Individuals with Mild Intellectual Disabilities and Borderline Intellectual Functioning

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/19315864.2020.1789250
M. Pieterse, J. VanDerNagel, P. T. ten Klooster, A. Turhan, R. Didden
{"title":"Psychometric Qualities of the Dutch Version of the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale Adapted for Individuals with Mild Intellectual Disabilities and Borderline Intellectual Functioning","authors":"M. Pieterse, J. VanDerNagel, P. T. ten Klooster, A. Turhan, R. Didden","doi":"10.1080/19315864.2020.1789250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction Personality traits may predict the use of substances in individuals with mild intellectual disabilities (MID) or borderline intellectual functioning (BIF). The Dutch version of the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale (SURPS), adapted for this population, was tested on its psychometric properties. Method Individuals with MID or BIF (IQ 50–85; N = 91) were recruited via disability care facilities or addiction treatment centers in the Netherlands. Reliability and validity was assessed with confirmatory factor analyses, internal consistency, and correlational analyses. Results The original four-factor structure of the SURPS was supported. Criterion validity was partially supported by associations between substance use and three subscales, and moderation analyses confirmed that these findings are independent of IQ status (MID vs. BIF). Conclusion The Dutch version of the SURPS adapted for individuals with MID-BIF has adequate psychometric properties, and seems suitable for research both within samples of individuals with MID and individuals with BIF.","PeriodicalId":45864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"180 1","pages":"250 - 266"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2020.1789250","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Personality traits may predict the use of substances in individuals with mild intellectual disabilities (MID) or borderline intellectual functioning (BIF). The Dutch version of the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale (SURPS), adapted for this population, was tested on its psychometric properties. Method Individuals with MID or BIF (IQ 50–85; N = 91) were recruited via disability care facilities or addiction treatment centers in the Netherlands. Reliability and validity was assessed with confirmatory factor analyses, internal consistency, and correlational analyses. Results The original four-factor structure of the SURPS was supported. Criterion validity was partially supported by associations between substance use and three subscales, and moderation analyses confirmed that these findings are independent of IQ status (MID vs. BIF). Conclusion The Dutch version of the SURPS adapted for individuals with MID-BIF has adequate psychometric properties, and seems suitable for research both within samples of individuals with MID and individuals with BIF.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
适用于轻度智障和边缘性智障个体的荷兰版物质使用风险概况量表的心理测量质量
人格特征可以预测轻度智力障碍(MID)或边缘性智力功能障碍(BIF)患者的物质使用。荷兰版的物质使用风险量表(SURPS),针对这一人群进行了心理测量特性测试。方法MID或BIF患者(IQ 50-85;N = 91)通过荷兰的残疾护理机构或成瘾治疗中心招募。信度和效度评估采用验证性因子分析、内部一致性和相关分析。结果支持了SURPS原有的四因子结构。物质使用和三个分量表之间的关联部分支持了标准效度,适度分析证实了这些发现与智商状态无关(MID vs. BIF)。结论荷兰版的SURPS适用于MID-BIF个体具有足够的心理测量特性,似乎适用于MID个体和BIF个体的样本研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Suicidality and Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review Mental Functions in People with Mild Intellectual Disability to Borderline Intellectual Functioning Personal Growth Among Parents of Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities and Psychopathology: The Role of Social Support and Attitudes Toward Service Use Clinical Opinion: Differences in Addressing Needs of Persons with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities for In-Person and Digital Psychotherapy Impact of Crisis Care on Psychiatric Admission in Adults with Intellectual Disability and Mental Illness And/Or Challenging Behavior: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1