Perceived technostress while learning a new mobile technology: Do individual differences and the way technology is presented matter?

Q1 Social Sciences Human Technology Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI:10.14254/1795-6889.2021.17-3.2
Paweł Jurek, Michał Olech, H. Brycz
{"title":"Perceived technostress while learning a new mobile technology: Do individual differences and the way technology is presented matter?","authors":"Paweł Jurek, Michał Olech, H. Brycz","doi":"10.14254/1795-6889.2021.17-3.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A growing body of research demonstrates that using technology can – despite the obvious benefits – be associated with stress. The aim of this study was to explore how perceived technostress while learning a new pro-healthy technology may be grounded in dispositional anxiety, attitudes towards ICT (Information and Communication Technologies), and the way technology is presented. Verifying the hypotheses, a study was conducted with the participation of N = 1,037 individuals, in which the 'technology presentation' was manipulated and selected individual differences were measured. As expected, it was found that presenting the new technology in the form of a popular science article was associated with the perception of this technology as more threatening and overloading compared to the situation in which the technology was presented in the form of a marketing leaflet with an unequivocally positive message. Moreover, it was shown that people characterized by higher dispositional anxiety perceived the new technology as more stressful in terms of examined categories of techno-stressors. Support was also found for the hypothesis that attitudes towards ICT corelate to selected dimensions of perceived technostress in regard to newly learned technology. However, the small extents of the effect obtained in the study indicated the need to continue searching for substantial factors that would predict technostress at the early stages of learning a new technology.","PeriodicalId":37614,"journal":{"name":"Human Technology","volume":"186 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2021.17-3.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

A growing body of research demonstrates that using technology can – despite the obvious benefits – be associated with stress. The aim of this study was to explore how perceived technostress while learning a new pro-healthy technology may be grounded in dispositional anxiety, attitudes towards ICT (Information and Communication Technologies), and the way technology is presented. Verifying the hypotheses, a study was conducted with the participation of N = 1,037 individuals, in which the 'technology presentation' was manipulated and selected individual differences were measured. As expected, it was found that presenting the new technology in the form of a popular science article was associated with the perception of this technology as more threatening and overloading compared to the situation in which the technology was presented in the form of a marketing leaflet with an unequivocally positive message. Moreover, it was shown that people characterized by higher dispositional anxiety perceived the new technology as more stressful in terms of examined categories of techno-stressors. Support was also found for the hypothesis that attitudes towards ICT corelate to selected dimensions of perceived technostress in regard to newly learned technology. However, the small extents of the effect obtained in the study indicated the need to continue searching for substantial factors that would predict technostress at the early stages of learning a new technology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习一项新的移动技术时感受到的技术压力:个体差异和技术呈现的方式重要吗?
越来越多的研究表明,尽管使用科技有明显的好处,但它可能与压力有关。本研究的目的是探讨在学习一项有益健康的新技术时,感知到的技术压力是如何基于性格焦虑、对ICT(信息和通信技术)的态度以及技术的呈现方式。为了验证这些假设,我们进行了一项有N = 1037人参与的研究,其中对“技术表现”进行了操纵,并测量了选定的个体差异。正如预期的那样,研究发现,以科普文章的形式展示新技术,与以带有明确积极信息的营销传单的形式展示新技术相比,会使人们认为这项技术更具威胁性和超载性。此外,研究还表明,在被检查的技术压力源类别中,具有较高性格焦虑特征的人认为新技术的压力更大。对信息和通信技术的态度与新学技术方面的感知技术压力的选定维度相关的假设也得到了支持。然而,研究中获得的影响范围很小,这表明需要继续寻找能够预测学习新技术早期阶段技术压力的实质性因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Technology
Human Technology Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Technology is an interdisciplinary, multiscientific journal focusing on the human aspects of our modern technological world. The journal provides a forum for innovative and original research on timely and relevant topics with the goal of exploring current issues regarding the human dimension of evolving technologies and, then, providing new ideas and effective solutions for addressing the challenges. Focusing on both everyday and professional life, the journal is equally interested in, for example, the social, psychological, educational, cultural, philosophical, cognitive scientific, and communication aspects of human-centered technology. Special attention shall be paid to information and communication technology themes that facilitate and support the holistic human dimension in the future information society.
期刊最新文献
Information literacy, data literacy, privacy literacy, and ChatGPT Payment implants as an element of human enhancement technology IT software purchase decisions in terms of business customer experience Artificial intelligence in social science: A study based on bibliometrics analysis Credibility of social media influencers: Impact on purchase intention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1