Exploring the Experiences of Medical Students from Implementing a Peer Program as a Mentor: A Qualitative Study

S. Najafipour, T. Rahimi, Alireza Roustazadeh, N. Dadgar, E. Rayeatdost, M. Rahmanian, M. Haghbin, A. Sadrneshin, Z. Dehdashti jahromei, P. Pourabbas, B. Omid Mokhtar Khanlou, HR Mortazavee
{"title":"Exploring the Experiences of Medical Students from Implementing a Peer Program as a Mentor: A Qualitative Study","authors":"S. Najafipour, T. Rahimi, Alireza Roustazadeh, N. Dadgar, E. Rayeatdost, M. Rahmanian, M. Haghbin, A. Sadrneshin, Z. Dehdashti jahromei, P. Pourabbas, B. Omid Mokhtar Khanlou, HR Mortazavee","doi":"10.18502/jmed.v17i3.11292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Today, peer education programs focus on scientific support, guiding and creating interaction between students has been considered to model students' scientific progress. The purpose of this study is to explore the experiences of medical students from implementing the peer program as a mentor using a qualitative framework. \nMethods: The present study is a qualitative study of the type of contractual content analysis with code of ethics IR.NASRME.REC.1400.067. The participants were selected by purposive sampling method with maximum diversity approach, including 30 medical students and 13 peers as mentors from 94 to 1400 entries. Qualitative data were collected using in-depth semi-structured interviews. The duration of the interviews was between 45-60 minutes. \nResult: In total, 24 girls (55.8 percent) and 19 boys (44.2 percent) students participated in this study. From the total interviews conducted, 267 open codes, 5 categories and 2 main themes were extracted. The main topics and classes include \"Peer as mentor program; a need-based approach\" with the sub-themes of facilitating the learning process, accelerating the achievement of goals and developing communication skills, and \"The need to promote the peer as mentor program\" with the sub-themes of the need to strengthen the infrastructure and the necessity of reviewing the standards related to the selection of the group leader. \nConclusion: The findings of the study showed that the process of the peer training program as a mentor is accompanied by challenges, but it can facilitate, increase theoretical and practical learning, as well as develop the communication skills of medical students.","PeriodicalId":30509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jmed.v17i3.11292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Today, peer education programs focus on scientific support, guiding and creating interaction between students has been considered to model students' scientific progress. The purpose of this study is to explore the experiences of medical students from implementing the peer program as a mentor using a qualitative framework. Methods: The present study is a qualitative study of the type of contractual content analysis with code of ethics IR.NASRME.REC.1400.067. The participants were selected by purposive sampling method with maximum diversity approach, including 30 medical students and 13 peers as mentors from 94 to 1400 entries. Qualitative data were collected using in-depth semi-structured interviews. The duration of the interviews was between 45-60 minutes. Result: In total, 24 girls (55.8 percent) and 19 boys (44.2 percent) students participated in this study. From the total interviews conducted, 267 open codes, 5 categories and 2 main themes were extracted. The main topics and classes include "Peer as mentor program; a need-based approach" with the sub-themes of facilitating the learning process, accelerating the achievement of goals and developing communication skills, and "The need to promote the peer as mentor program" with the sub-themes of the need to strengthen the infrastructure and the necessity of reviewing the standards related to the selection of the group leader. Conclusion: The findings of the study showed that the process of the peer training program as a mentor is accompanied by challenges, but it can facilitate, increase theoretical and practical learning, as well as develop the communication skills of medical students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨医学生以导师身分实施同伴计划的经验:一项质性研究
导读:如今,同伴教育项目注重科学支持、指导和创造学生之间的互动,被认为是学生科学进步的典范。本研究旨在探讨医学生以导师身分实施同伴计划的经验。方法:采用伦理准则IR.NASRME.REC.1400.067对契约内容进行定性分析。采用最大多样性法的目的抽样方法,从94 ~ 1400个样本中抽取30名医学生和13名同行作为导师。采用深度半结构化访谈收集定性数据。采访时间在45-60分钟之间。结果:共有24名女生(55.8%)和19名男生(44.2%)参与了本研究。从访谈总数中,提取了267个开放代码,5个类别和2个主题。主要的主题和课程包括“同伴导师计划”;“以需求为基础的方法”,其副主题是促进学习过程,加速实现目标和发展沟通技巧,以及“促进同伴作为导师计划的必要性”,其副主题是加强基础设施的必要性和审查与小组领导选择相关的标准的必要性。结论:本研究结果表明,医学生同侪导师培训的过程是充满挑战的,但它能促进医学生的理论和实践学习,并能培养医学生的沟通能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Game-Based Learning for Soft Skills Using the Peer Learning Method in the E-learning Process: Creating a Support-Motivational Mechanism for the Parasitology MS Students in Shahid Sadougi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd E-learning Quality Assessment Indicators: A Narrative Review ChatGPT in writing scientific articles: friend or foe? Explaining Medical Students' Experiences of the Challenges of Clinical Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Qualitative Content Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1