Analysis of four polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in plant-based food supplements—results of a collaborative study

Amelie S. Wilde, L. Duedahl-Olesen
{"title":"Analysis of four polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in plant-based food supplements—results of a collaborative study","authors":"Amelie S. Wilde, L. Duedahl-Olesen","doi":"10.1080/19440049.2022.2082539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The determination of carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in food supplements is challenging, especially due to the presence of other e.g. heterogeneous PAH-like compounds in the matrix. A collaborative study with 12 participants was conducted in order to assess performance characteristics of a fast method intended to analyse the four regulated PAHs (PAH 4) benzo[b]fluoranthene [BbF], benz[a]anthracene [BaA], chrysene [CHR] and benzo[a]pyrene [BaP] in five different plant-based food supplements in the form of capsules, powder, and tablets. The principle of the method includes the extraction of PAHs with ethyl acetate: cyclohexane followed by a two-step SPE cleanup and final analysis by GC-MS or LC-FLD. The regulated maximum level for BaP is 10 µg/kg and, for the PAH 4, 50 µg/kg. Accordingly, the method was validated for the regulated PAH 4 analytically challenging concentration range from 2.5 µg/kg to 6.9 µg/kg. The performance criteria for the method set in European Regulation No 333/2007 for the overall repeatability, reproducibility (HorRat values below 2), and recovery (range 50–120%) were fulfilled. Based on the statistical evaluation of the results, it was concluded that the method is a suitable alternative to existing methods and should be studied for additional matrices.","PeriodicalId":12121,"journal":{"name":"Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A","volume":"33 1","pages":"1380 - 1389"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2022.2082539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The determination of carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in food supplements is challenging, especially due to the presence of other e.g. heterogeneous PAH-like compounds in the matrix. A collaborative study with 12 participants was conducted in order to assess performance characteristics of a fast method intended to analyse the four regulated PAHs (PAH 4) benzo[b]fluoranthene [BbF], benz[a]anthracene [BaA], chrysene [CHR] and benzo[a]pyrene [BaP] in five different plant-based food supplements in the form of capsules, powder, and tablets. The principle of the method includes the extraction of PAHs with ethyl acetate: cyclohexane followed by a two-step SPE cleanup and final analysis by GC-MS or LC-FLD. The regulated maximum level for BaP is 10 µg/kg and, for the PAH 4, 50 µg/kg. Accordingly, the method was validated for the regulated PAH 4 analytically challenging concentration range from 2.5 µg/kg to 6.9 µg/kg. The performance criteria for the method set in European Regulation No 333/2007 for the overall repeatability, reproducibility (HorRat values below 2), and recovery (range 50–120%) were fulfilled. Based on the statistical evaluation of the results, it was concluded that the method is a suitable alternative to existing methods and should be studied for additional matrices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植物性食品补充剂中四种多环芳烃的分析——一项合作研究的结果
食品补充剂中致癌性多环芳烃(PAHs)的测定具有挑战性,特别是由于基质中存在其他异相类多环芳烃化合物。为了评估一种快速方法的性能特征,与12名参与者进行了一项合作研究,该方法旨在分析五种不同植物性食品补充剂中以胶囊、粉末和片剂形式存在的四种受管制的多环芳烃(PAH 4):苯并[b]荧光蒽[BbF]、苯并[A]蒽[BaA]、蒽[CHR]和苯并[A]芘[BaP]。该方法的原理是用乙酸乙酯和环己烷萃取多环芳烃,然后进行两步SPE净化,最后用GC-MS或LC-FLD分析。BaP的最大监管水平为10µg/kg, PAH 4的最大监管水平为50µg/kg。因此,该方法在2.5µg/kg至6.9µg/kg的受控多环芳烃4浓度范围内进行了验证。该方法符合欧洲法规No 333/2007中设定的总体重复性、再现性(HorRat值低于2)和回收率(范围50-120%)的性能标准。基于对结果的统计评价,认为该方法是现有方法的一种合适的替代方法,需要对其他矩阵进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Infant nutrition at risk: a global systematic review of ochratoxin A in human breast milk-human health risk assessment. Determination and evaluation of canthaxanthin and β-apo-8'-carotenoid ethyl ester in chicken eggs and meat in Tianjin. A worldwide systematic review of ochratoxin A in various coffee products - human exposure and health risk assessment. Determination of azodicarbonamide in flour samples using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with xanthydrol pre-column derivatisation. Food process contaminants: formation, occurrence, risk assessment and mitigation strategies – a review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1