In Reparable Rotator Cuff Tears with Lesions of the Long Head of the Biceps Brachii Tendon, Tenotomy Did Not Differ from Tenodesis in Terms of Function or Pain

J. Karlsson
{"title":"In Reparable Rotator Cuff Tears with Lesions of the Long Head of the Biceps Brachii Tendon, Tenotomy Did Not Differ from Tenodesis in Terms of Function or Pain","authors":"J. Karlsson","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.16.01383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lee HJ, Jeong JY, Kim CK, Kim YS. Surgical treatment of lesions of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon with rotator cuff tear: a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the clinical results of tenotomy and tenodesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Jul;25(7):1107-14.\n\n### Question:\n\nIn patients with reparable rotator cuff tears and symptomatic lesions of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon (LHBT), what is the comparative efficacy of tenotomy and tenodesis?\n\n### Design:\n\nRandomized (allocation not concealed)*, blinded (patients and outcome assessors), controlled trial with follow-up at a mean of 20 or 25 months.\n\n### Setting:\n\nThe Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.\n\n### Patients:\n\n137 patients (mean age, 63 years; 77% women) who needed surgical repair for small to medium-sized rotator cuff tears and had concomitant symptomatic partial tears of the LHBT (confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging) that had shown no improvement after ≥1 month of conservative treatment with medication or corticosteroid injections. The exclusion criteria were large or massive rotator cuff tears, previous shoulder surgery or trauma, glenohumeral arthritis, …","PeriodicalId":22579,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery","volume":"57 1","pages":"351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.01383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Lee HJ, Jeong JY, Kim CK, Kim YS. Surgical treatment of lesions of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon with rotator cuff tear: a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the clinical results of tenotomy and tenodesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Jul;25(7):1107-14. ### Question: In patients with reparable rotator cuff tears and symptomatic lesions of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon (LHBT), what is the comparative efficacy of tenotomy and tenodesis? ### Design: Randomized (allocation not concealed)*, blinded (patients and outcome assessors), controlled trial with follow-up at a mean of 20 or 25 months. ### Setting: The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. ### Patients: 137 patients (mean age, 63 years; 77% women) who needed surgical repair for small to medium-sized rotator cuff tears and had concomitant symptomatic partial tears of the LHBT (confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging) that had shown no improvement after ≥1 month of conservative treatment with medication or corticosteroid injections. The exclusion criteria were large or massive rotator cuff tears, previous shoulder surgery or trauma, glenohumeral arthritis, …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在可修复的肩袖撕裂伴肱二头肌肌腱长头损伤中,肌腱切开术与肌腱固定术在功能或疼痛方面没有区别
李海杰,郑建勇,金志强,金永元。肱二头肌肌腱长头病变伴肩袖撕裂的手术治疗:一项前瞻性随机临床试验,比较肌腱切断术和肌腱固定术的临床结果。[J]中华肩关节外科杂志,2016;25(7):1107-14。问题:对于可修复的肩袖撕裂和有症状的肱二头肌腱长头病变(LHBT)的患者,肌腱切断术和肌腱固定术的比较疗效如何?设计:随机(分配不隐藏)*,盲法(患者和结果评估者),对照试验,平均随访20或25个月。地点:韩国首尔天主教大学。患者:137例(平均年龄63岁;(77%的女性)需要手术修复中小型肩袖撕裂,并伴有LHBT的症状性部分撕裂(经磁共振成像证实),经药物或皮质类固醇注射保守治疗≥1个月后无改善。排除标准为肩袖撕裂、既往肩部手术或创伤、肩关节关节炎、…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Prospective, Longitudinal Study of the Influence of Obesity on Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision Rate A Comparison of Revision Rates and Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with 28, 32, and 36-mm Femoral Heads and Different Cup Sizes In Adults Aged <65 Years with Unstable Ankle Fractures, Fibular Nailing Did Not Differ from Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Functional Outcome at 1 Year In Single-Bundle ACL Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon Autograft, Knee Flexion Angle of 0° Versus 30° During Tibial ACL Graft Fixation Did Not Differ for KOOS Subscales, but Improved Activity Level In Patients with Displaced Type-II Distal Clavicle Fractures, Operative and Nonoperative Therapies Did Not Differ for Functional Outcomes at 1 Year
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1