{"title":"Een altaarstuk voor parochianen en pelgrims in Heiloo","authors":"Xander van Eck","doi":"10.1163/18750176-90000020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Roman Catholic Parish of Heiloo, a village near Alkmaar, possesses a painting dated 1631 combining three scenes. The top part shows St. Dominic and St. Catherine of Siena receiving the Rosary from Mary and the Christ child (fig. 1). This occurrence takes place on what seems to be the roof of a gallery, under which the two other scenes are located. To the right St. Dominic is seen performing a miracle: while in Toulouse, the heretic Albigenses challenged him to throw his writings in the fire, but they bounced back unscathed three times, causing the Albigenses to repent. A print by Theodoor Galle (fig. 2) was the basis for the composition. At the left St. Willibrord, who converted large parts of the Netherlands to Christianity in the eight century and became the first bishop of Utrecht, is shown praying next to a well in Heiloo, his followers standing by. The well as it looked in 1631 and the medieval church that still stands in the center of the village (fig. 5) are both portrayed in this scene. The painting was most probably commissioned as an altarpiece for a clandestine catholic church not far from the place where it is currently kept. In the first decades of the seventeenth century Heiloo was administered by Dominican missionaries, which explains the prominence of Dominican saints in two of the three scenes. The most prominent Dominican priest was Hyacintus Hermanni (fig. 6), a native of Alkmaar, who is here identified as the patron for this altarpiece. It is not signed, but there are strong similarities with the style of Alkmaar's leading figure painter at the time, Nicolaes van der Heck (fig. 8). Hermanni's portrait can be found to the right of the pillar dividing the two scenes, looking at the viewer and wearing liturgical clothing. The 'Well of Willibrord' had been a destination for pilgrims since late Medieval times, and on closer inspection the theme of pilgrimage pervades the whole painting. One of the followers of St. Willibrord was St. Adalbert (fig. 11), who was buried in the neighbouring village of Egmond, close to the famous Egmond Abbey. According to the legend he was a deacon and in the picture he is identifiable by the colourful cope he is wearing - the rest of Willibrord's followers are characterized as Benedictine monks. Behind Adalbert a heavenly ray of light is seen, going in the direction of a building on the horizon which, by its silhouette, can be recognized as Egmond Abbey, partly destroyed by the sea beggars in 1573 (figs. 9, 10). This building and the nearby well which had formed at Adalberts grave were also visited by pilgrims from all over the Republic. An even greater attraction for pilgrims coming to Heiloo was the site known as Our Lady of Solace (Onze Lieve Vrouw ter Nood) in the hamlet of Oesdom. It consisted of the ruins of a chapel that used to house a miraculous statue of Mary. The chapel had been partially torn down by the protestants in 1573 and the miraculous statue disappeared as well, but these misfortunes made the place only more holy to the catholics living in the protestant country. There were also new miracles: in a picture of a family on pilgrimage from 1630 an apparition of the Virgin is vaguely indicated in the walls of the ruin, in a pose reminiscent of the apparition of the Virgin in our altarpiece (figs. 12, 13). It was not only in this painting that the three abovementioned sites were united - a printed map dated 1704, entitled 'Hyloo-er ryskaartje' ('Heiloo travel map') was specifically produced to show pilgrims the way to the sanctuaries of Willibrord, Adalbert and Mary (fig. 15). The complicated iconography of this altarpiece can thus be explained as an attempt by the dominican friars administering the Heiloo parish, to merge the specific devotions of their order with local devotions connected to nearby pilgrimage sites. The pilgrimage theme is reinforced by the relief figure of a pilgrim above the central column (fig. 17).","PeriodicalId":39579,"journal":{"name":"OUD HOLLAND","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OUD HOLLAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18750176-90000020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Roman Catholic Parish of Heiloo, a village near Alkmaar, possesses a painting dated 1631 combining three scenes. The top part shows St. Dominic and St. Catherine of Siena receiving the Rosary from Mary and the Christ child (fig. 1). This occurrence takes place on what seems to be the roof of a gallery, under which the two other scenes are located. To the right St. Dominic is seen performing a miracle: while in Toulouse, the heretic Albigenses challenged him to throw his writings in the fire, but they bounced back unscathed three times, causing the Albigenses to repent. A print by Theodoor Galle (fig. 2) was the basis for the composition. At the left St. Willibrord, who converted large parts of the Netherlands to Christianity in the eight century and became the first bishop of Utrecht, is shown praying next to a well in Heiloo, his followers standing by. The well as it looked in 1631 and the medieval church that still stands in the center of the village (fig. 5) are both portrayed in this scene. The painting was most probably commissioned as an altarpiece for a clandestine catholic church not far from the place where it is currently kept. In the first decades of the seventeenth century Heiloo was administered by Dominican missionaries, which explains the prominence of Dominican saints in two of the three scenes. The most prominent Dominican priest was Hyacintus Hermanni (fig. 6), a native of Alkmaar, who is here identified as the patron for this altarpiece. It is not signed, but there are strong similarities with the style of Alkmaar's leading figure painter at the time, Nicolaes van der Heck (fig. 8). Hermanni's portrait can be found to the right of the pillar dividing the two scenes, looking at the viewer and wearing liturgical clothing. The 'Well of Willibrord' had been a destination for pilgrims since late Medieval times, and on closer inspection the theme of pilgrimage pervades the whole painting. One of the followers of St. Willibrord was St. Adalbert (fig. 11), who was buried in the neighbouring village of Egmond, close to the famous Egmond Abbey. According to the legend he was a deacon and in the picture he is identifiable by the colourful cope he is wearing - the rest of Willibrord's followers are characterized as Benedictine monks. Behind Adalbert a heavenly ray of light is seen, going in the direction of a building on the horizon which, by its silhouette, can be recognized as Egmond Abbey, partly destroyed by the sea beggars in 1573 (figs. 9, 10). This building and the nearby well which had formed at Adalberts grave were also visited by pilgrims from all over the Republic. An even greater attraction for pilgrims coming to Heiloo was the site known as Our Lady of Solace (Onze Lieve Vrouw ter Nood) in the hamlet of Oesdom. It consisted of the ruins of a chapel that used to house a miraculous statue of Mary. The chapel had been partially torn down by the protestants in 1573 and the miraculous statue disappeared as well, but these misfortunes made the place only more holy to the catholics living in the protestant country. There were also new miracles: in a picture of a family on pilgrimage from 1630 an apparition of the Virgin is vaguely indicated in the walls of the ruin, in a pose reminiscent of the apparition of the Virgin in our altarpiece (figs. 12, 13). It was not only in this painting that the three abovementioned sites were united - a printed map dated 1704, entitled 'Hyloo-er ryskaartje' ('Heiloo travel map') was specifically produced to show pilgrims the way to the sanctuaries of Willibrord, Adalbert and Mary (fig. 15). The complicated iconography of this altarpiece can thus be explained as an attempt by the dominican friars administering the Heiloo parish, to merge the specific devotions of their order with local devotions connected to nearby pilgrimage sites. The pilgrimage theme is reinforced by the relief figure of a pilgrim above the central column (fig. 17).
在阿尔克马尔附近的一个村庄,罗马天主教的黑卢教区,有一幅1631年的画,包括三个场景。顶部描绘了圣多米尼克和锡耶纳的圣凯瑟琳从圣母玛利亚和圣婴耶稣手中接过玫瑰经(图1)。这件事发生在一个画廊的屋顶上,另外两个场景就在画廊的屋顶下。在右边,圣多米尼克正在表演一个奇迹:而在图卢兹,异端的阿尔比宗派挑战他把他的作品扔进火里,但他们三次毫发无损地反弹回来,导致阿尔比宗派忏悔。西奥多·加勒(图2)的版画是构成的基础。在左边,圣威利布罗德(St. Willibrord)在八世纪使荷兰大部分地区皈依基督教,并成为乌得勒支(Utrecht)的第一位主教。他在海卢(Heiloo)的一口井旁祈祷,他的追随者站在旁边。1631年的井和仍屹立在村庄中心的中世纪教堂(图5)都被描绘在这一场景中。这幅画很可能是被委托作为一个秘密的天主教教堂的祭坛画,离它现在保存的地方不远。在17世纪的头几十年里,海卢由多米尼加传教士管理,这解释了多米尼加圣徒在三个场景中的两个突出地位。最著名的多米尼加牧师是Hyacintus Hermanni(图6),他是阿尔克马尔人,在这里被认为是这幅祭坛画的赞助人。这幅画没有署名,但与阿尔克马尔当时的主要人物画家尼古拉斯·范德赫克(Nicolaes van der Heck)的风格有很大的相似之处(图8)。赫曼尼的肖像位于分隔两个场景的柱子的右侧,看着观众,穿着礼拜服。自中世纪晚期以来,“威利伯德之井”一直是朝圣者的目的地,仔细观察,朝圣的主题贯穿了整幅画。圣阿达伯是圣威利伯德的追随者之一(图11),他被埋葬在邻近的埃格蒙德村,靠近著名的埃格蒙德修道院。根据传说,他是一名执事,在这幅画中,他穿着色彩鲜艳的斗篷,可以认出他来——其余的威利布罗德的追随者被描述为本笃会的僧侣。在阿德贝身后,可以看到一道天光,正朝着地平线上一座建筑的方向照去,从它的轮廓可以看出,这是埃格蒙德修道院,1573年部分被海上乞丐摧毁。9、10)。这座建筑和附近在阿达贝尔墓旁形成的井也吸引了来自共和国各地的朝圣者前来参观。对前来海卢朝圣的朝圣者来说,一个更有吸引力的地方是位于奥斯多姆村的“安慰圣母”(Onze Lieve Vrouw ter Nood)。它由一座教堂的废墟组成,这座教堂曾经供奉着一尊神奇的玛丽雕像。1573年,教堂的一部分被新教徒拆除,雕像也消失了,但这些不幸使这个地方对生活在新教国家的天主教徒来说更加神圣。还有新的奇迹:在1630年的一幅朝圣家庭的照片中,废墟的墙壁上隐约显示出圣母显灵,她的姿势让人想起我们祭坛上圣母显灵的姿势(图2)。12、13)。不仅在这幅画中,上述三个地点被联系在一起——1704年的一幅印刷地图,题为“hylo -er ryskaartje”(“Heiloo旅行地图”),是专门为朝圣者指明通往Willibrord, Adalbert和Mary圣殿的道路(图15)。因此,这个祭坛上复杂的图像可以解释为多米尼加修士管理Heiloo教区的尝试,将他们的命令的特定奉献与附近朝圣地点的当地奉献合并在一起。中央柱子上方的一个朝圣者浮雕形象强化了朝圣主题(图17)。
OUD HOLLANDArts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
7
期刊介绍:
The periodical Oud Holland is the oldest surviving art-historical periodical in the world. Founded by A.D. de Vries and N. der Roever in 1883, it has appeared virtually without interruption ever since. It is entirely devoted to the visual arts in the Netherlands up to the mid-nineteenth century and has featured thousands of scholarly articles by Dutch and foreign authors, including numerous pioneering art-historical studies. Almost from the magazine’s inception, the publication of archival information concerning Dutch artists has played an important role. From 1885 to his death in 1946, the renowned art historian Dr. Abraham Bredius set a standard of excellence for Oud Holland.