Intrapartum magnesium sulfate exposure and obstetric hemorrhage risk

Sara Young, Michelle J. Wang, A. Srivastava, D. Abbas, Megan Alexander, Lindsey Claus, S. Tummala, C. Yarrington, A. Comfort
{"title":"Intrapartum magnesium sulfate exposure and obstetric hemorrhage risk","authors":"Sara Young, Michelle J. Wang, A. Srivastava, D. Abbas, Megan Alexander, Lindsey Claus, S. Tummala, C. Yarrington, A. Comfort","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2022.2086796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The gold standard intrapartum treatment for preeclampsia with severe features is magnesium sulfate in order to provide prophylaxis against eclampsia. However, though magnesium sulfate is known to have a relaxant effect on uterine muscle, there have been variable reports in the literature in regard to the association between magnesium and obstetric hemorrhage (OBH). Objective We aim to compare OBH incidence in patients with hypertensive disease of pregnancy (HDP) with or without exposure to intrapartum magnesium sulfate. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of all deliveries at our institution associated with a diagnosis of hypertensive disease of pregnancy (HDP) (e.g. chronic and gestational hypertension, preeclampsia with or without severe features, eclampsia, or HELLP) from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019. The category of HDP diagnosis was determined by a detailed chart review by trained chart abstractors. The primary outcome was total quantitative blood loss (QBL) and the rate of obstetric hemorrhage. Secondary outcomes included a composite of obstetric hemorrhage-related maternal morbidity outcomes (OBH-M), the individual composite components and the incidence of additional hemorrhage-related interventions (e.g. uterotonics and surgical interventions). We also examined the same primary and secondary outcomes in a stratified analysis based on delivery mode (i.e. vaginal deliveries only and cesarean deliveries only). Results Of 791 patients with a diagnosis of HDP, 411 patients received magnesium sulfate for eclampsia prophylaxis and 380 patients did not receive magnesium sulfate. For all delivery modes, there was a significantly higher QBL (p < .01), increased rate of OBH (p = .04) and increased OBH-M (p < .01) in deliveries associated with intrapartum exposure to magnesium compared to those without. However, our stratified analysis by delivery mode demonstrated that magnesium-related hemorrhage risk only persisted for vaginal deliveries (QBL p < .01; OBH aOR 1.47, 95% CI: 0.75–2.85; OBH-M aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.00–7.55) with no significant hemorrhage-related differences among cesareans with or without magnesium exposure (QBL p = .51; OBH aOR 1.45, 95% CI: 0.85–2.47; OBH-M 1.50 95% CI: 0.70–3.23). Conclusion Intrapartum exposure to magnesium sulfate use was associated with an increase in QBL and risk of OBH-M in vaginal deliveries, but not associated with any hemorrhage-related outcome differences in cesarean deliveries. More research is needed to explore the effects of hypertensive disease, magnesium exposure, and delivery mode on obstetric hemorrhage risk.","PeriodicalId":22921,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"10036 - 10043"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2022.2086796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Background The gold standard intrapartum treatment for preeclampsia with severe features is magnesium sulfate in order to provide prophylaxis against eclampsia. However, though magnesium sulfate is known to have a relaxant effect on uterine muscle, there have been variable reports in the literature in regard to the association between magnesium and obstetric hemorrhage (OBH). Objective We aim to compare OBH incidence in patients with hypertensive disease of pregnancy (HDP) with or without exposure to intrapartum magnesium sulfate. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of all deliveries at our institution associated with a diagnosis of hypertensive disease of pregnancy (HDP) (e.g. chronic and gestational hypertension, preeclampsia with or without severe features, eclampsia, or HELLP) from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019. The category of HDP diagnosis was determined by a detailed chart review by trained chart abstractors. The primary outcome was total quantitative blood loss (QBL) and the rate of obstetric hemorrhage. Secondary outcomes included a composite of obstetric hemorrhage-related maternal morbidity outcomes (OBH-M), the individual composite components and the incidence of additional hemorrhage-related interventions (e.g. uterotonics and surgical interventions). We also examined the same primary and secondary outcomes in a stratified analysis based on delivery mode (i.e. vaginal deliveries only and cesarean deliveries only). Results Of 791 patients with a diagnosis of HDP, 411 patients received magnesium sulfate for eclampsia prophylaxis and 380 patients did not receive magnesium sulfate. For all delivery modes, there was a significantly higher QBL (p < .01), increased rate of OBH (p = .04) and increased OBH-M (p < .01) in deliveries associated with intrapartum exposure to magnesium compared to those without. However, our stratified analysis by delivery mode demonstrated that magnesium-related hemorrhage risk only persisted for vaginal deliveries (QBL p < .01; OBH aOR 1.47, 95% CI: 0.75–2.85; OBH-M aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.00–7.55) with no significant hemorrhage-related differences among cesareans with or without magnesium exposure (QBL p = .51; OBH aOR 1.45, 95% CI: 0.85–2.47; OBH-M 1.50 95% CI: 0.70–3.23). Conclusion Intrapartum exposure to magnesium sulfate use was associated with an increase in QBL and risk of OBH-M in vaginal deliveries, but not associated with any hemorrhage-related outcome differences in cesarean deliveries. More research is needed to explore the effects of hypertensive disease, magnesium exposure, and delivery mode on obstetric hemorrhage risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产时硫酸镁暴露与产科出血风险
背景为了预防子痫的发生,重度子痫前期产时治疗的金标准是硫酸镁。然而,虽然已知硫酸镁对子宫肌肉有松弛作用,但关于镁与产科出血(OBH)之间的关系,文献中有不同的报道。目的比较产时接触硫酸镁或不接触硫酸镁的妊娠高血压病(HDP)患者OBH的发生率。方法:我们对2018年1月1日至2019年12月31日在我院分娩的所有与妊娠高血压疾病(HDP)(如慢性和妊娠高血压、伴有或不伴有严重特征的先兆子痫、子痫或HELLP)诊断相关的分娩进行了回顾性队列研究。HDP诊断的类别是由训练有素的图表抽象者通过详细的图表审查确定的。主要观察指标为总定量失血量(QBL)和产科出血率。次要结局包括产科出血相关产妇发病率结局(OBH-M)、个别复合成分和额外出血相关干预措施(如子宫强直和手术干预)的发生率。我们还在基于分娩方式(即仅阴道分娩和仅剖宫产分娩)的分层分析中检查了相同的主要和次要结局。结果在诊断为HDP的791例患者中,411例患者接受了硫酸镁预防子痫,380例患者未接受硫酸镁治疗。对于所有分娩方式,产时暴露于镁的分娩与未暴露于镁的分娩相比,QBL (p < 0.01)、OBH率(p = 0.04)和OBH- m (p < 0.01)均显著升高。然而,我们对分娩方式的分层分析显示,镁相关出血风险仅在阴道分娩时持续存在(QBL p < 0.01;OBH or 1.47, 95% CI: 0.75-2.85;ohh - m aOR为1.47,95% CI为1.00-7.55),在有或没有镁暴露的剖宫产者中无显著的出血相关差异(QBL p = 0.51;OBH or 1.45, 95% CI: 0.85-2.47;Obh-m 1.50 (95% ci: 0.70-3.23)。结论:产时暴露于硫酸镁与阴道分娩中QBL和OBH-M风险的增加有关,但与剖宫产中任何出血相关的结局差异无关。需要更多的研究来探讨高血压疾病、镁暴露和分娩方式对产科出血风险的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of specialty training and physician attitudes on fetal cardiac counseling Fetoplacental unit involvement in uric acid production in women with severe preeclampsia: a prospective case control pilot study. Causal association of sex hormone-binding globulin on gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study Targeted metabolomic analysis of early-trimester serum identifies potential mechanisms for late-onset preeclampsia Statement of retraction: effect of daily consumption of probiotic yoghurt on lipid profiles in pregnant women: a randomized controlled clinical trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1