COMPARISON OF ORAL PREMEDICATION IN CHILDREN (1-16YRS) USING MIDAZOLAM VERSUS CLONIDINE: A PROSPECTIVE DOUBLE BLIND STUDY

Dr.Asif Mammutty Pm, S. MuhammedAmeenG, Dr.Ashir Kr
{"title":"COMPARISON OF ORAL PREMEDICATION IN CHILDREN (1-16YRS) USING MIDAZOLAM VERSUS CLONIDINE: A PROSPECTIVE DOUBLE BLIND STUDY","authors":"Dr.Asif Mammutty Pm, S. MuhammedAmeenG, Dr.Ashir Kr","doi":"10.15520/IJMHS.V10I06.3012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background \nPremedication in pediatric anesthesia is a challenge for Anesthesiologist. Anxious children have higher incidence of negative postoperative behaviors for up to two weeks after surgery. Hence, right premedication is the eternal search for anesthesia fraternity. \nAims and Objectives \nTo compare oral midazolam (0.5mg/kg) with oral clonidine (4 micrograms/kg) as a pre medication in children \nMaterial & Methods \nThis study was carried out on 30 children who were admitted to Yenepoya Medical College & Hospital for surgical intervention under general anaesthesia during the period from 01-10-2009 to 30-11-2011. \nResult \nIn the midazolam group the sedation score after 30 mins and 90 mins, 80% of the subjects were awake . In the Clonidine group it was found that 66.7% are drowsy at 30 mins and 70% are drowsy at 90 mins. The difference between to the groups was statistically highly significant. \nIn the midazolam group parental separation were good only in 56% of the subjects where as it was 93.3% in the Clonidine group which is statistically highly significant. \nIn the midazolam group the mask acceptance was good in 86.7% of the subjects . In the Clonidine group 100% of the subjects had good acceptance. \n  \nConclusion \nPresent study showed that premedication oral clonidine appeared to superior than oral midazolam.Oral clonidine produces significantly better sedation than oral midazolam","PeriodicalId":13590,"journal":{"name":"Innovative Journal of Medical and Health Science","volume":"685 1","pages":"1030-1035"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovative Journal of Medical and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15520/IJMHS.V10I06.3012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Premedication in pediatric anesthesia is a challenge for Anesthesiologist. Anxious children have higher incidence of negative postoperative behaviors for up to two weeks after surgery. Hence, right premedication is the eternal search for anesthesia fraternity. Aims and Objectives To compare oral midazolam (0.5mg/kg) with oral clonidine (4 micrograms/kg) as a pre medication in children Material & Methods This study was carried out on 30 children who were admitted to Yenepoya Medical College & Hospital for surgical intervention under general anaesthesia during the period from 01-10-2009 to 30-11-2011. Result In the midazolam group the sedation score after 30 mins and 90 mins, 80% of the subjects were awake . In the Clonidine group it was found that 66.7% are drowsy at 30 mins and 70% are drowsy at 90 mins. The difference between to the groups was statistically highly significant. In the midazolam group parental separation were good only in 56% of the subjects where as it was 93.3% in the Clonidine group which is statistically highly significant. In the midazolam group the mask acceptance was good in 86.7% of the subjects . In the Clonidine group 100% of the subjects had good acceptance.   Conclusion Present study showed that premedication oral clonidine appeared to superior than oral midazolam.Oral clonidine produces significantly better sedation than oral midazolam
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1-16岁儿童口服药物前使用咪达唑仑与可乐定的比较:一项前瞻性双盲研究
背景:小儿麻醉前用药是麻醉师面临的一个挑战。术后两周内,焦虑儿童的术后不良行为发生率较高。因此,正确的预用药是对麻醉兄弟会的永恒追求。目的与目的比较口服咪达唑仑(0.5mg/kg)与口服可乐定(4微克/kg)作为儿童前用药的差异。材料与方法本研究于2009年1月10日至2011年11月30日在叶内波亚医学院医院全麻下接受外科手术治疗的30例儿童。结果咪达唑仑组30 min和90 min镇静评分,80%的受试者清醒。在可乐定组中,发现66.7%的人在30分钟时昏昏欲睡,70%的人在90分钟时昏昏欲睡。两组之间的差异在统计学上是非常显著的。在咪达唑仑组中,只有56%的受试者父母分离良好,而在可乐定组中,这一比例为93.3%,这在统计学上是非常显著的。咪达唑仑组86.7%的受试者面罩接受度良好。可乐定组100%的受试者接受度良好。结论用药前口服可乐定优于口服咪达唑仑。口服可乐定镇静效果明显优于口服咪达唑仑
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute Neonatal Upper Limb Ischemia: Topical Vasodilation, Anticoagulation and Physical Therapy-A new option for complete reversal of ischemia Linezolid Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Case Report The Accuracy of Documented Nursing Care Plan among Registered Nurses CONTRADICTION TO CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. SUPPRESSION AND STIMULATION OF IMMUNE REACTIVITY IN PATHOLOGICAL PROCESSES Child and Adolescent Obesity in Saudi Arabia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1