Intraocular Pressure in Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusions Treated With Repeated Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant: A Retrospective Analysis

Y. Louati, C. Bergin, Sakina Ezziat, P. D. Gottrau, V. Vaclavik
{"title":"Intraocular Pressure in Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusions Treated With Repeated Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant: A Retrospective Analysis","authors":"Y. Louati, C. Bergin, Sakina Ezziat, P. D. Gottrau, V. Vaclavik","doi":"10.35248/2155-9570.21.12.873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: To assess the long-term findings of repeated Dexamethasone (DEX) implants in patients with Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO) with the Intraocular Pressure (IOP) measures set as the primary end point. The second end point is the anatomical and functional findings. Methods: In this retrospective study, IOP, antiglaucoma treatment, Visual Acuity (VA), Central Macular Thickness (CMT), number of treatments, interval between treatments, and other safety outcomes data were collected at the Ophthalmology Department, Hopital Cantonal de Fribourg during 3 years. Results: Twenty-seven patients (28 eyes; 16 branch-RVO and 12 central-RVO) were eligible for analysis. Mean interval between diagnosis and treatment for treatment-naive and prior-treated patients (anti-VEGF) was 23 days and 18 months, respectively. Across six repeated treatments, IOP (i.e. ≥ 21 mmHg) was elevated in 23/27 patients, 13 received IOP-lowering medications. After the first DEX implant, mean VA improved from baseline (0.8 LogMAR (20/125 Snellen Equivalent)) at month 1 (0.6 LogMAR (20/80 approximate Snellen Equivalent)) followed by a gradual decline back to baseline at month 4. Following the first implant, mean CMT decreased from baseline (604.3 μm) to 381 μm and 426.1 μm at months 1 and 4, respectively, and remained similar until end of follow-up. A similar pattern of CMT reduction occurred following implants 2 and 3. Patients received a median of two implants, with a treatment interval of approximately 5 months. Conclusion: In a real-life clinical setting, intravitreal DEX improved VA and reduced CMT with no new safety concerns in patients with RVO. IOP elevation was transient and managed with short-term treatment with no cumulative effect on IOP elevation despite intervals <6 months , and no cases of glaucoma surgery recorded.","PeriodicalId":15372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":"34 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2155-9570.21.12.873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To assess the long-term findings of repeated Dexamethasone (DEX) implants in patients with Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO) with the Intraocular Pressure (IOP) measures set as the primary end point. The second end point is the anatomical and functional findings. Methods: In this retrospective study, IOP, antiglaucoma treatment, Visual Acuity (VA), Central Macular Thickness (CMT), number of treatments, interval between treatments, and other safety outcomes data were collected at the Ophthalmology Department, Hopital Cantonal de Fribourg during 3 years. Results: Twenty-seven patients (28 eyes; 16 branch-RVO and 12 central-RVO) were eligible for analysis. Mean interval between diagnosis and treatment for treatment-naive and prior-treated patients (anti-VEGF) was 23 days and 18 months, respectively. Across six repeated treatments, IOP (i.e. ≥ 21 mmHg) was elevated in 23/27 patients, 13 received IOP-lowering medications. After the first DEX implant, mean VA improved from baseline (0.8 LogMAR (20/125 Snellen Equivalent)) at month 1 (0.6 LogMAR (20/80 approximate Snellen Equivalent)) followed by a gradual decline back to baseline at month 4. Following the first implant, mean CMT decreased from baseline (604.3 μm) to 381 μm and 426.1 μm at months 1 and 4, respectively, and remained similar until end of follow-up. A similar pattern of CMT reduction occurred following implants 2 and 3. Patients received a median of two implants, with a treatment interval of approximately 5 months. Conclusion: In a real-life clinical setting, intravitreal DEX improved VA and reduced CMT with no new safety concerns in patients with RVO. IOP elevation was transient and managed with short-term treatment with no cumulative effect on IOP elevation despite intervals <6 months , and no cases of glaucoma surgery recorded.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反复地塞米松玻璃体内植入治疗视网膜静脉阻塞患者眼压的回顾性分析
以眼压(IOP)测量为主要终点,评估反复地塞米松(DEX)植入视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)患者的长期疗效。第二个终点是解剖和功能的发现。方法:在这项回顾性研究中,收集了弗里堡州立医院眼科3年来的IOP、抗青光眼治疗、视力(VA)、中央黄斑厚度(CMT)、治疗次数、治疗间隔和其他安全性结局数据。结果:27例患者(28眼;16例分支rvo和12例中央rvo符合分析条件。未接受治疗和已接受治疗的患者(抗vegf)诊断和治疗的平均间隔时间分别为23天和18个月。在6次重复治疗中,27例患者中有23例眼压升高(即≥21 mmHg), 13例接受了降低眼压的药物治疗。在第一次DEX植入后,平均VA在第1个月从基线(0.8 LogMAR (20/125 Snellen当量))(0.6 LogMAR(20/80近似Snellen当量))改善,然后在第4个月逐渐下降到基线。第一次植入后,平均CMT在第1个月和第4个月分别从基线(604.3 μm)下降到381 μm和426.1 μm,并保持相似直到随访结束。植入物2号和3号后出现了类似的CMT减少模式。患者平均接受两次植入,治疗间隔约为5个月。结论:在现实的临床环境中,玻璃体内DEX改善了RVO患者的VA和减少了CMT,没有新的安全性问题。IOP升高是短暂的,通过短期治疗得到控制,尽管间隔时间<6个月,但IOP升高没有累积效应,没有青光眼手术记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tuesday 1 March Speakers Film Abstracts Monday 28 February Speakers Sunday 27 February Speakers Modification of Biochemical Derangements and VEGF Secretion May Prevent Diabetic Retinopathy (DR): An Advance Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1