{"title":"Empedocles on the Inheritance of Parental Traits by Offspring","authors":"A. Pimenova","doi":"10.21638/spbu20.2022.202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with the embryological teaching of Empedocles, the ancient Greek philosopher from Acragas, who lived in the 5th century BC. The article is focused on the mechanisms by which children inherit their parents’ features in the doctrine of Empedocles. The available fragments and evidence on the teachings of early Greek philosophers often provide distorted and sometimes contradictory information. This paper attempts to carefully analyze all the evidence regarding inheritance mechanisms and bring it into an agreement with each other without resorting to abandoning some of the fragments. The most extensive information is provided to us by Censorinus, the 3rd century Roman writer, who in 238 AD wrote the treatise De die natali to congratulate his patron Caerelius on his 49th birthday. The article comments in detail on the testimony of Censorinus (De die natali, 6. 6 = 31 A 81 DK) concerning Empedocles’ views on the inheritance of parental traits by children, as well as the contradictory messages by Aetius (Aët. 5. 11. 1 = A 81) and Aristotle (De gen. an. I, 18, 723a23; IV, 1, 764a1f.; 765a 8 = 31 A 81 DK). The analysis conducted by Erna Lesky in her famous monograph of 1950 was expanded and supplemented in this article. In addition, the study takes into accountthe evidence of cases where children do not resemble their parents. Empedocles justifies these cases by popular superstitions, which were widespread in Europe up to the 20th century.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu20.2022.202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The paper deals with the embryological teaching of Empedocles, the ancient Greek philosopher from Acragas, who lived in the 5th century BC. The article is focused on the mechanisms by which children inherit their parents’ features in the doctrine of Empedocles. The available fragments and evidence on the teachings of early Greek philosophers often provide distorted and sometimes contradictory information. This paper attempts to carefully analyze all the evidence regarding inheritance mechanisms and bring it into an agreement with each other without resorting to abandoning some of the fragments. The most extensive information is provided to us by Censorinus, the 3rd century Roman writer, who in 238 AD wrote the treatise De die natali to congratulate his patron Caerelius on his 49th birthday. The article comments in detail on the testimony of Censorinus (De die natali, 6. 6 = 31 A 81 DK) concerning Empedocles’ views on the inheritance of parental traits by children, as well as the contradictory messages by Aetius (Aët. 5. 11. 1 = A 81) and Aristotle (De gen. an. I, 18, 723a23; IV, 1, 764a1f.; 765a 8 = 31 A 81 DK). The analysis conducted by Erna Lesky in her famous monograph of 1950 was expanded and supplemented in this article. In addition, the study takes into accountthe evidence of cases where children do not resemble their parents. Empedocles justifies these cases by popular superstitions, which were widespread in Europe up to the 20th century.
这篇论文讨论了恩培多克勒的胚胎学教学,他是生活在公元前5世纪的古希腊哲学家,来自阿克拉加斯。本文主要探讨恩培多克勒斯学说中子女继承父母特征的机制。关于早期希腊哲学家的教导,现有的片段和证据经常提供扭曲的,有时甚至是相互矛盾的信息。本文试图仔细分析所有关于继承机制的证据,并在不放弃某些片段的情况下使其相互一致。最广泛的信息是由三世纪的罗马作家Censorinus提供的,他在公元238年写了一篇论文De die natali来祝贺他的赞助人Caerelius的49岁生日。本文详细评述了Censorinus (De die natali, 6)的证词。6 = 31 A 81 DK)关于恩培多克勒关于孩子继承父母特征的观点,以及埃提乌斯的矛盾信息(Aët)。5. 11. 1 = A 81)和亚里士多德(De gen. an。1, 18, 723a23;IV, 1, 764a;765a 8 = 31 A 81 DK)。Erna Lesky在她1950年的著名专著中所做的分析在本文中得到了扩展和补充。此外,该研究还考虑到了孩子长得不像父母的证据。恩培多克勒斯用流行的迷信来为这些事件辩护,这些迷信在20世纪之前在欧洲很普遍。