Comparison of the Effects of Midazolam, Propofol, and Dexmede-tomidine on Hemodynamics Variation in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery under Local Anesthesia at 5th Azar Hospital in Gorgan in 2021-2022

Seyede Mahrokh Alinaghimaddah, Mohammad Reza Akbari, Kazem Kazemnejad Tabrizi, Vahid Ownagh, Seyed Esmaeil Hatami
{"title":"Comparison of the Effects of Midazolam, Propofol, and Dexmede-tomidine on Hemodynamics Variation in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery under Local Anesthesia at 5th Azar Hospital in Gorgan in 2021-2022","authors":"Seyede Mahrokh Alinaghimaddah, Mohammad Reza Akbari, Kazem Kazemnejad Tabrizi, Vahid Ownagh, Seyed Esmaeil Hatami","doi":"10.32592/nkums.14.4.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Cataract surgery is a common surgery, especially among the elderly, and the choice of anesthesia medications is critical in such patients. In this study, the effects of midazolam, propofol, and dexmedetomidine were investigated for sedation in patients undergoing cataract surgery under local anesthesia.\nMethod: Ninety patients were included in this study and underwent cataract surgery using class II and III anesthesia (according to the ASA criteria). They were also randomly assigned to three groups. The first group received midazolam, the second group received propofol, and the third group received dexmedetomidine. During the surgery and recovery phase, blood pressure, arterial blood oxygen saturation, heart rate, and the occurrence of complications were recorded. Data were analyzed using the SPSS software (version 23) at a significance level of 0.05.\nResults: Alterations in arterial blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) levels were not significantly different among the three groups (P>0.05); however, there were fewer changes in SpO2 levels at recovery in the propofol group (P<0.05). Moreover, alterations in blood pressure did not differ significantly across the three groups during the surgery (P>0.05), whereas during the recovery, they were lower in the group receiving dexmedetomidine (P>0.05). Finally, Heart rates were not significantly different among the three groups during surgery and recovery (P>0.05).\nConclusion: The results demonstrated that in patients with hypertension and tachycardia, dexmedetomidine may be a better choice for sedation.","PeriodicalId":16423,"journal":{"name":"journal of north khorasan university of medical sciences","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"journal of north khorasan university of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32592/nkums.14.4.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cataract surgery is a common surgery, especially among the elderly, and the choice of anesthesia medications is critical in such patients. In this study, the effects of midazolam, propofol, and dexmedetomidine were investigated for sedation in patients undergoing cataract surgery under local anesthesia. Method: Ninety patients were included in this study and underwent cataract surgery using class II and III anesthesia (according to the ASA criteria). They were also randomly assigned to three groups. The first group received midazolam, the second group received propofol, and the third group received dexmedetomidine. During the surgery and recovery phase, blood pressure, arterial blood oxygen saturation, heart rate, and the occurrence of complications were recorded. Data were analyzed using the SPSS software (version 23) at a significance level of 0.05. Results: Alterations in arterial blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) levels were not significantly different among the three groups (P>0.05); however, there were fewer changes in SpO2 levels at recovery in the propofol group (P<0.05). Moreover, alterations in blood pressure did not differ significantly across the three groups during the surgery (P>0.05), whereas during the recovery, they were lower in the group receiving dexmedetomidine (P>0.05). Finally, Heart rates were not significantly different among the three groups during surgery and recovery (P>0.05). Conclusion: The results demonstrated that in patients with hypertension and tachycardia, dexmedetomidine may be a better choice for sedation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2021-2022年戈尔根市第五阿扎医院局麻白内障手术患者咪达唑仑、异丙酚和右美托咪定对血流动力学变化的影响
白内障手术是一种常见的手术,特别是在老年人中,麻醉药物的选择对这类患者至关重要。本研究探讨了咪达唑仑、异丙酚和右美托咪定在局部麻醉下对白内障手术患者的镇静作用。方法:90例白内障患者(按照ASA标准)采用II级和III级麻醉行白内障手术。他们也被随机分为三组。第一组给予咪达唑仑,第二组给予异丙酚,第三组给予右美托咪定。术中及恢复期记录血压、动脉血氧饱和度、心率及并发症发生情况。数据分析采用SPSS软件(版本23),显著性水平为0.05。结果:三组患者动脉血氧饱和度(SpO2)水平变化差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);异丙酚组恢复时SpO2水平变化较小(P0.05),右美托咪定组恢复时SpO2水平变化较低(P>0.05)。三组患者手术及恢复期间心率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:右美托咪定可能是高血压合并心动过速患者较好的镇静选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Jigsaw and Traditional Teaching Methods on Learning and Motivation of Laboratory Science Students of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences in Parasitology Course in 2022 Effects of Citicoline and Atorvastatin Administration on the Regenerative Capacity of the Distal Segment of the Transected Sciatic Nerve in Conditions of Delayed Nerve Repair Effect of Two Types of Aerobic Exercise Programs on NT4 Gene Expression and Motor Performance in Spinally Injured Rats Effect of Hydroalcoholic Extract of Ginger on Cardiac Parameters in Male Rats with Renovascular Hypertension Comparison of the Frequency of Vaginal Infections in Women with Premature Delivery and Women with Term Delivery in Ali Ibn Abitaleb Hospital of Zahedan in 2018
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1