Intentions, Results, and Disuse of Online Dating for Religious and Non-Religious Emerging Adults

IF 0.7 0 RELIGION Journal of Media and Religion Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/15348423.2021.2017738
Lindsey Almond, Jacquelyn K. Mallette
{"title":"Intentions, Results, and Disuse of Online Dating for Religious and Non-Religious Emerging Adults","authors":"Lindsey Almond, Jacquelyn K. Mallette","doi":"10.1080/15348423.2021.2017738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study determines religious differences associated with emerging adults’ perceptions, intentions, and usage of online dating. Symbolic interaction theory informs how symbols associated with online dating impact perceptions, intentions, and usage among a sample of 447 emerging adults, between 18 and 30 years old. More religious individuals were found to use online dating less, have more negative perceptions, and hold more concerns about online dating, showing that religious beliefs and norms may still associate online dating as a sexual culture. The association of religiosity and resultant relationships was found to be mediated by frequency and concerns about online dating, but not perceptions. As technology continues to expand, online dating usage will likely become widespread. Implications for practitioners and future research are provided.","PeriodicalId":55954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media and Religion","volume":"225 1","pages":"38 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Media and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2021.2017738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study determines religious differences associated with emerging adults’ perceptions, intentions, and usage of online dating. Symbolic interaction theory informs how symbols associated with online dating impact perceptions, intentions, and usage among a sample of 447 emerging adults, between 18 and 30 years old. More religious individuals were found to use online dating less, have more negative perceptions, and hold more concerns about online dating, showing that religious beliefs and norms may still associate online dating as a sexual culture. The association of religiosity and resultant relationships was found to be mediated by frequency and concerns about online dating, but not perceptions. As technology continues to expand, online dating usage will likely become widespread. Implications for practitioners and future research are provided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有宗教信仰和无宗教信仰的新兴成人在线约会的意图、结果和弃用
本研究确定了宗教差异与新兴成人的观念、意图和在线约会的使用有关。符号互动理论揭示了与在线约会相关的符号如何影响447名18至30岁的新兴成年人的感知、意图和使用。研究发现,更多的宗教人士使用网上约会的次数更少,对网上约会有更多的负面看法,并对网上约会抱有更多的担忧,这表明宗教信仰和规范可能仍然将网上约会与性文化联系在一起。研究发现,宗教信仰和由此产生的人际关系之间的联系受网络约会的频率和关注的影响,而不是观念的影响。随着科技的不断发展,在线约会的使用可能会变得普遍。提供了对从业者和未来研究的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Still Fighting the God-Vs.-Gays Battle: Twitter Reaction to Presidential Candidate Pete Buttigieg’s Identification as a Gay Member of the Christian Left Tweeting for Religion: How Indonesian Islamic Fundamentalist Organizations Use Twitter Differences in Religious Framing of Muslims and Islam in American Media Coverage Before and After the Trump Campaign Faith Discourses in the Context of Racial Tension: Black Lives Matter and Its Counter-Narratives Digital Merit: A Case Study of a Chinese Buddhist Meditation Group on WeChat During the Early Outbreak of Covid-19 in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1