Effect of long-term locomotion and balance exercise on functional mobility considering the Parkinson’s disease subtypes: a pilot study

V. S. Beretta, D. Orcioli-Silva, D. Jaimes, B. R. Legutke, Thiago M. Sirico, P. L. Gonçalves, Lilian T. B. Gobbi *in memorium
{"title":"Effect of long-term locomotion and balance exercise on functional mobility considering the Parkinson’s disease subtypes: a pilot study","authors":"V. S. Beretta, D. Orcioli-Silva, D. Jaimes, B. R. Legutke, Thiago M. Sirico, P. L. Gonçalves, Lilian T. B. Gobbi *in memorium","doi":"10.20338/bjmb.v17i4.360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Different clinical subtypes (i.e., Postural Instability and Gait Difficulty -PIGD and Tremor Dominant -TD) have been highlighted in Parkinson's disease (PD). Although physical exercise improves motor symptoms in PD, the knowledge about the effect of physical exercise considering the PD subtype is limited.\nAIM: To compare the effects of long-term locomotion and balance exercise on lower limb functional strength and functional mobility in PD subtypes.\nMETHOD: Eight individuals PIGD and 10 TD participated in this study. All individuals participated in the interventions with exercises focused on improving locomotion and balance. 48 sessions of exercise were performed three times per week for 60 minutes each session. Functional Mobility was analyzed by the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) in a single (ST) and double-task (DT – i.e., subtraction by three). Lower limb functional strength was analyzed by the 30s sit-to-stand test. Both tests were performed at baseline (pre-test) and post-intervention (post-test). Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA, with Group (PIGD vs. TD) and Moment (pre vs. post-test) factors, with repeated measures for the second factor.\nRESULTS: PIGD decreased the time to perform TUG_ST in the post-test compared to the pre-test (p=0.001). Both groups decreased the time in TUG_DT and increased the number of repetitions in sit-to-stand test in the post-test in relation to the pre-test (p<0.05).\nCONCLUSION: Long-term locomotion and balance exercise programs can improve functional mobility mainly in PIGD. A possible explanation is due to the greater room for improvement of PIGD subtypes and exercise specificity.","PeriodicalId":91007,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian journal of motor behavior","volume":"148 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian journal of motor behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20338/bjmb.v17i4.360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Different clinical subtypes (i.e., Postural Instability and Gait Difficulty -PIGD and Tremor Dominant -TD) have been highlighted in Parkinson's disease (PD). Although physical exercise improves motor symptoms in PD, the knowledge about the effect of physical exercise considering the PD subtype is limited. AIM: To compare the effects of long-term locomotion and balance exercise on lower limb functional strength and functional mobility in PD subtypes. METHOD: Eight individuals PIGD and 10 TD participated in this study. All individuals participated in the interventions with exercises focused on improving locomotion and balance. 48 sessions of exercise were performed three times per week for 60 minutes each session. Functional Mobility was analyzed by the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) in a single (ST) and double-task (DT – i.e., subtraction by three). Lower limb functional strength was analyzed by the 30s sit-to-stand test. Both tests were performed at baseline (pre-test) and post-intervention (post-test). Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA, with Group (PIGD vs. TD) and Moment (pre vs. post-test) factors, with repeated measures for the second factor. RESULTS: PIGD decreased the time to perform TUG_ST in the post-test compared to the pre-test (p=0.001). Both groups decreased the time in TUG_DT and increased the number of repetitions in sit-to-stand test in the post-test in relation to the pre-test (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Long-term locomotion and balance exercise programs can improve functional mobility mainly in PIGD. A possible explanation is due to the greater room for improvement of PIGD subtypes and exercise specificity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑帕金森病亚型的长期运动和平衡运动对功能活动能力的影响:一项初步研究
背景:不同的临床亚型(即姿势不稳定和步态困难-PIGD和震颤显性-TD)在帕金森病(PD)中得到了强调。虽然体育锻炼可以改善PD患者的运动症状,但考虑到PD亚型,关于体育锻炼效果的知识有限。目的:比较长期运动和平衡运动对PD亚型患者下肢功能力量和功能活动能力的影响。方法:8例PIGD患者和10例TD患者参与了本研究。所有人都参与了以改善运动和平衡为重点的干预运动。每周三次,每次60分钟,共进行48次锻炼。在单任务(ST)和双任务(DT -即减3)中,通过Timed Up and Go测试(TUG)分析功能迁移能力。采用30s坐立试验分析下肢功能强度。两项测试均在基线(测试前)和干预后(测试后)进行。统计分析采用双因素方差分析,组(PIGD vs. TD)和时刻(测试前vs.测试后)因素,第二个因素重复测量。结果:与前测相比,PIGD减少了后测中进行TUG_ST的时间(p=0.001)。与前测相比,两组在测试后均缩短了TUG_DT时间,增加了坐立测试的重复次数(p<0.05)。结论:长期运动和平衡训练方案主要能改善PIGD患者的功能活动能力。一种可能的解释是由于PIGD亚型和运动特异性有更大的改进空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Muscle activity increased after co-contraction resistance training, but it was unrelated to the rating of perceived exertion in older adults There is no difference between two and five minutes of static stretching training and detraining on gastrocnemius medialis muscle thickness, pennation angle and fascicle length INFOGRAPHIC: Changes in locomotor performance and postural control in people with hemophilia The complexity of the handgrip task modulates postural performance in older adults How the multiplanar trunk resistance affects the dynamic postural control during single-leg vertical jumps in college athletes with poor movement quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1