A personal child health record for children with a disability

John Moore, Annette Brindle, Paramjit Goraya, Sarah Monk, Deanne Rennie, Rashmin Tamhne, Jennifer Watterson, David Stretch
{"title":"A personal child health record for children with a disability","authors":"John Moore,&nbsp;Annette Brindle,&nbsp;Paramjit Goraya,&nbsp;Sarah Monk,&nbsp;Deanne Rennie,&nbsp;Rashmin Tamhne,&nbsp;Jennifer Watterson,&nbsp;David Stretch","doi":"10.1046/j.1467-0658.2000.00091.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p><b>Objectives</b> To test whether a child health record designed for preschool children with a disability would: (a) be used; (b) be valued by carers; (c) change the perception of the health care received by the child; or (d) influence the amount of communication between the family and a professional who is seeing their child.</p>\n <p><b>Methods</b> Ninety-nine families participated, and of these, 67 received the record as the intervention and 32 were controls. After use, copies of the record were examined, and carers completed a satisfaction questionnaire. The families were randomized into three groups for two-phase controlled questionnaire studies to measure changes in the families' perception of their child's health care and the degree of communication between the family and the professional.</p>\n <p><b>Results</b> Satisfaction questionnaires were returned by 53 (79%) of those who received a record, and most of the responses were favourable. Of the 39 (58%) who returned copies, nearly all had made some use of the record, and 24 had made entries in its diary section. There was no accompanying change that could be measured in the perception of the child's health care or in the amount of communication between families and professionals.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions</b> Those who participated in this small study appreciated the new disability section added to the standard child health record. Copies returned for inspection had nearly all been used. The lack of a detectable change in the family's perception of their child's health care or in communication between families and professionals suggests that the value of the record is limited to its use as an aide-mèmoire.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100075,"journal":{"name":"Ambulatory Child Health","volume":"6 4","pages":"261-267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1467-0658.2000.00091.x","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambulatory Child Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1467-0658.2000.00091.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objectives To test whether a child health record designed for preschool children with a disability would: (a) be used; (b) be valued by carers; (c) change the perception of the health care received by the child; or (d) influence the amount of communication between the family and a professional who is seeing their child.

Methods Ninety-nine families participated, and of these, 67 received the record as the intervention and 32 were controls. After use, copies of the record were examined, and carers completed a satisfaction questionnaire. The families were randomized into three groups for two-phase controlled questionnaire studies to measure changes in the families' perception of their child's health care and the degree of communication between the family and the professional.

Results Satisfaction questionnaires were returned by 53 (79%) of those who received a record, and most of the responses were favourable. Of the 39 (58%) who returned copies, nearly all had made some use of the record, and 24 had made entries in its diary section. There was no accompanying change that could be measured in the perception of the child's health care or in the amount of communication between families and professionals.

Conclusions Those who participated in this small study appreciated the new disability section added to the standard child health record. Copies returned for inspection had nearly all been used. The lack of a detectable change in the family's perception of their child's health care or in communication between families and professionals suggests that the value of the record is limited to its use as an aide-mèmoire.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
残疾儿童的个人儿童健康记录
目的测试为学龄前残疾儿童设计的儿童健康记录是否会:(a)使用;(b)获照顾者重视;(c)改变对儿童获得保健的看法;或(d)影响家庭与为其孩子看病的专业人员之间的沟通量。方法99个家庭参与调查,其中干预组67个,对照组32个。使用后,检查记录副本,护理人员完成满意度问卷。这些家庭被随机分为三组,进行两阶段对照问卷研究,以测量家庭对孩子保健的看法的变化以及家庭与专业人员之间沟通的程度。结果收到记录的人员中,有53人(79%)回复了满意度问卷,大多数回答是满意的。在归还副本的39人中(58%),几乎所有人都使用了一些记录,24人在日记部分做了记录。在对儿童保健的看法或家庭与专业人员之间的沟通数量方面,没有可以衡量的伴随变化。结论:参与这项小型研究的人对标准儿童健康记录中新增的残疾部分表示赞赏。退回来供检查的副本几乎都用过了。家庭对其子女保健的看法或家庭与专业人员之间的沟通没有明显的变化,这表明该记录的价值仅限于作为备忘录的用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The greatest impact of war and conflict Child, adolescent and student health monitor Social gradients in child health: why do they occur and what can paediatricians do about them? Current literature Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1