{"title":"End of the Assembly Line Gearbox Fault Inspection Using Artificial Neural Network and Support Vector Machines","authors":"P. Kane, A. Andhare","doi":"10.20855/IJAV.2019.24.11258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gear fault diagnosis is important not only during the routine maintenance of machinery, but also during the inspection of newly manufactured gearboxes at the end of the assembly line. This paper discusses the application\nof an artificial neural network (ANN) and a support vector machine (SVM) for identifying faults in the gearbox,\nusing the psychoacoustic and conventional statistical features extracted from acoustics and vibration signals. It\nis observed that at the end of the assembly line, the gearbox is tested by mounting it on a test bench and driving\nit by an electric motor. Based on the sound emitted while running on the test bench, the operator decides on the\nacceptance of the gearbox for further assembly on a vehicle or machine. This method of acceptance or rejection of\nthe gearbox involves subjectivity and it is not reliable. Hence, it is important to have a reliable and objective fault\ndetection and diagnosis method. To eliminate subjectivity, psychoacoustic features, which are derived from the science of listening in human beings, are proposed to be used as features, along with ANN and SVMs as classifiers.\nTo ascertain the ability of the psychoacoustic features to classify faults, laboratory experiments are carried on a test\nsetup by simulating faults like a gear shaft misalignment, a profile error of a gear tooth, a crack at the root of the\ntooth, and a broken tooth. ANN and SVM are trained with the psychoacoustic features extracted from the acoustic\nsignal and other statistical features from the acoustics and vibration signals. The trained SVM and ANN are tested\nfor fault classification for these features and their accuracy is compared. Fault classification accuracy is found to be\n95.65% for ANN and 93.44% for SVM with psychoacoustic features and is found to be better than pure statistical\nfeatures obtained from the vibration and acoustic signals. With the optimised ANN and SVM architecture, SVM\nis found to be performing better than ANN. It is concluded that the psychoacoustic features, along with the ANN\nand SVM method, could be adopted at the end of assembly line inspection to make the inspection process more\nobjective.","PeriodicalId":18217,"journal":{"name":"March 16","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"March 16","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20855/IJAV.2019.24.11258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
Gear fault diagnosis is important not only during the routine maintenance of machinery, but also during the inspection of newly manufactured gearboxes at the end of the assembly line. This paper discusses the application
of an artificial neural network (ANN) and a support vector machine (SVM) for identifying faults in the gearbox,
using the psychoacoustic and conventional statistical features extracted from acoustics and vibration signals. It
is observed that at the end of the assembly line, the gearbox is tested by mounting it on a test bench and driving
it by an electric motor. Based on the sound emitted while running on the test bench, the operator decides on the
acceptance of the gearbox for further assembly on a vehicle or machine. This method of acceptance or rejection of
the gearbox involves subjectivity and it is not reliable. Hence, it is important to have a reliable and objective fault
detection and diagnosis method. To eliminate subjectivity, psychoacoustic features, which are derived from the science of listening in human beings, are proposed to be used as features, along with ANN and SVMs as classifiers.
To ascertain the ability of the psychoacoustic features to classify faults, laboratory experiments are carried on a test
setup by simulating faults like a gear shaft misalignment, a profile error of a gear tooth, a crack at the root of the
tooth, and a broken tooth. ANN and SVM are trained with the psychoacoustic features extracted from the acoustic
signal and other statistical features from the acoustics and vibration signals. The trained SVM and ANN are tested
for fault classification for these features and their accuracy is compared. Fault classification accuracy is found to be
95.65% for ANN and 93.44% for SVM with psychoacoustic features and is found to be better than pure statistical
features obtained from the vibration and acoustic signals. With the optimised ANN and SVM architecture, SVM
is found to be performing better than ANN. It is concluded that the psychoacoustic features, along with the ANN
and SVM method, could be adopted at the end of assembly line inspection to make the inspection process more
objective.