{"title":"The effect of Skinny Cow Condition on first-year students’ expectations of assessment and feedback","authors":"Marike Annandale, E. Reyneke","doi":"10.5785/36-2-949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"De Beer and Gravett (2016: 46) sound the alarm that most first-year students who report for teacher training at tertiary institutions in South Africa emerge from an examination-driven system and are unable to engage with self-directed learning (SDL). This is disconcerting since students of the 21st century who enrol for university studies across the world are expected to be self-directed, taking responsibility for their own academic progress while focusing on active rather than passive learning (Nasri, 2017: 1). The English for Education course at the North-West University in South Africa requires students to be critically engaged as they direct their own learning. However, the high dropout rate (North-West University, 2018) of the first-year English for Education students (around 25% per annum over the last three years) and the average drop in their English marks from high school to university suggest that students find it difficult to adapt to the demands of tertiary studies. This paper reports on a study that focused on the teaching, learning and assessment gaps between secondary and tertiary education and which aimed at developing a framework to promote SDL in first-year English for Education studies. The findings illustrated that students felt frustrated by lecturer feedback on assignments that demanded active engagement and critical thinking. It became clear that students were unable to interpret feedback and that they felt unsupported if the lecturer did not show and tell them exactly what to write or would not supply them with detailed answers to memorise and reproduce.","PeriodicalId":43109,"journal":{"name":"Per Linguam-A Journal of Language Learning","volume":"30 1","pages":"45-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Per Linguam-A Journal of Language Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5785/36-2-949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
De Beer and Gravett (2016: 46) sound the alarm that most first-year students who report for teacher training at tertiary institutions in South Africa emerge from an examination-driven system and are unable to engage with self-directed learning (SDL). This is disconcerting since students of the 21st century who enrol for university studies across the world are expected to be self-directed, taking responsibility for their own academic progress while focusing on active rather than passive learning (Nasri, 2017: 1). The English for Education course at the North-West University in South Africa requires students to be critically engaged as they direct their own learning. However, the high dropout rate (North-West University, 2018) of the first-year English for Education students (around 25% per annum over the last three years) and the average drop in their English marks from high school to university suggest that students find it difficult to adapt to the demands of tertiary studies. This paper reports on a study that focused on the teaching, learning and assessment gaps between secondary and tertiary education and which aimed at developing a framework to promote SDL in first-year English for Education studies. The findings illustrated that students felt frustrated by lecturer feedback on assignments that demanded active engagement and critical thinking. It became clear that students were unable to interpret feedback and that they felt unsupported if the lecturer did not show and tell them exactly what to write or would not supply them with detailed answers to memorise and reproduce.
De Beer和Gravett(2016: 46)警告说,大多数在南非高等教育机构接受教师培训的一年级学生都来自考试驱动的系统,无法参与自主学习(SDL)。这是令人不安的,因为21世纪的学生在世界各地的大学学习被期望是自我指导的,为自己的学业进步负责,同时专注于主动而不是被动的学习(Nasri, 2017: 1)。南非西北大学的教育英语课程要求学生在指导自己的学习时批判性地参与。然而,教育英语一年级学生的高辍学率(西北大学,2018年)(过去三年中每年约25%)和他们从高中到大学的英语成绩平均下降表明,学生很难适应高等教育的要求。本文报告了一项研究,该研究侧重于中等教育和高等教育之间的教学,学习和评估差距,旨在制定一个框架,以促进第一年教育英语学习中的SDL。研究结果表明,学生对讲师对需要积极参与和批判性思维的作业的反馈感到沮丧。很明显,学生无法理解反馈,如果讲师没有展示并告诉他们该写什么,或者不提供详细的答案让他们记忆和复制,他们会感到不受支持。