A Meta-Theoretical Discussion on Strengthening the Processual-Relational Sociology of Childhood

IF 0.1 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Insan & Toplum-The Journal of Humanity & Society Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.12658/m0706
Fazilet Dalfidan
{"title":"A Meta-Theoretical Discussion on Strengthening the Processual-Relational Sociology of Childhood","authors":"Fazilet Dalfidan","doi":"10.12658/m0706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relational sociology of childhood often has a structural character; however, the main problem is that the structural character largely confines the “ontological turn” in childhood studies. This is related to the fact that how structures are understood in relational analysis is mostly based on a one-way perspective: Structures are “systems of human relations between social positions”. In this context, this article problematizes the structural character of relational childhood ontology. In order to overcome the problem, we should trace alternative relational conceptualizations and show how we can work them in relational childhood sociology. Based on the processual character in hybrid-relational childhood ontology, this article argues which features of Elias and Dépelteau’s relational ontologies can be included in the relational ontology of childhood in order to strengthen the understanding of interdependence relations at the interactional level. The aim of the article is to make a theoretical contribution to the strengthening of the processual character in the relational analysis of childhood by drawing attention to the need for processual-relational childhood ontology as an alternative to the structural-relational perspective. Looking at children’s agency from a processual-relational perspective will further reveal the potential and capacity of children to transform their social worlds and social fields.","PeriodicalId":53769,"journal":{"name":"Insan & Toplum-The Journal of Humanity & Society","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insan & Toplum-The Journal of Humanity & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12658/m0706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relational sociology of childhood often has a structural character; however, the main problem is that the structural character largely confines the “ontological turn” in childhood studies. This is related to the fact that how structures are understood in relational analysis is mostly based on a one-way perspective: Structures are “systems of human relations between social positions”. In this context, this article problematizes the structural character of relational childhood ontology. In order to overcome the problem, we should trace alternative relational conceptualizations and show how we can work them in relational childhood sociology. Based on the processual character in hybrid-relational childhood ontology, this article argues which features of Elias and Dépelteau’s relational ontologies can be included in the relational ontology of childhood in order to strengthen the understanding of interdependence relations at the interactional level. The aim of the article is to make a theoretical contribution to the strengthening of the processual character in the relational analysis of childhood by drawing attention to the need for processual-relational childhood ontology as an alternative to the structural-relational perspective. Looking at children’s agency from a processual-relational perspective will further reveal the potential and capacity of children to transform their social worlds and social fields.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强化儿童过程关系社会学的元理论探讨
儿童的关系社会学往往具有结构性特征;然而,主要的问题是结构特征在很大程度上限制了儿童研究的“本体论转向”。这与在关系分析中如何理解结构主要基于单向视角的事实有关:结构是“社会地位之间的人类关系系统”。在此背景下,本文对关系儿童本体的结构特征提出了质疑。为了克服这个问题,我们应该追踪其他关系概念,并展示我们如何在关系儿童社会学中研究它们。本文从混合关系童年本体的过程性特征出发,探讨了伊莱亚斯和达姆佩尔托关系本体的哪些特征可以被纳入童年关系本体,以加强对互动层面上相互依赖关系的理解。本文的目的是通过关注过程-关系童年本体论作为结构-关系视角的替代方案的必要性,为加强童年关系分析中的过程特征做出理论贡献。从过程关系的角度看待儿童能动性将进一步揭示儿童改变其社会世界和社会领域的潜力和能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Insan & Toplum-The Journal of Humanity & Society
Insan & Toplum-The Journal of Humanity & Society SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
LGBT Hareketin Gelişimi, Kurumsallaşması ve Batı Medeniyet Projesine Dönüşümü İslam Can & Ejder Ulutaş, Teşhir Toplumu: Bir Duyu Sosyolojisi Denemesi, Ketebe Yayınları, 2021, 188 s. Martha C. Nussbaum, Her Şey Çıkar İçin mi? Demokrasi İnsanlığa Neden İhtiyaç Duyuyor? İrem Sağlamer (Çev.), Sander Yayınları, 2022, 184 s. M. Sami Okumuş, Tarihin Televizyonla İhyası: TRT Tarihi ve Dizi Filmler (1974-2020). Dergâh Yayınları, 2021, 306 s. Hezbollah’s Diversionary War in Lebanon: Continuity and Change in the Threat Perception
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1