NEPA assessments for large-scale renewable energy projects on Army land: Best practices and lessons learned

Q3 Social Sciences Environmental Practice Pub Date : 2017-09-21 DOI:10.1080/14660466.2017.1372542
Stephanie M. Rice, Elizabeth Keysar
{"title":"NEPA assessments for large-scale renewable energy projects on Army land: Best practices and lessons learned","authors":"Stephanie M. Rice, Elizabeth Keysar","doi":"10.1080/14660466.2017.1372542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Federal landholding agencies such as the Department of Defense (DoD) are actively seeking to diversify energy supplies and decrease fossil fuel reliance while increasing energy security and resilience. Within DoD, the Army’s Office of Energy Initiatives (OEI) works to achieve these goals by developing large-scale renewable and alternative energy projects on Army land through private sector financing. Proper implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) ensures renewable energy projects have a net positive impact on environmental health and sustainability. The Army’s experience conducting NEPA assessments for these projects provides a unique perspective on the effectiveness of the NEPA process, including challenges, best practices, and lessons learned that apply broadly to NEPA practitioners. This article illustrates specific examples through descriptions of NEPA assessments for three OEI projects at various stages of completion.","PeriodicalId":45250,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14660466.2017.1372542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Federal landholding agencies such as the Department of Defense (DoD) are actively seeking to diversify energy supplies and decrease fossil fuel reliance while increasing energy security and resilience. Within DoD, the Army’s Office of Energy Initiatives (OEI) works to achieve these goals by developing large-scale renewable and alternative energy projects on Army land through private sector financing. Proper implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) ensures renewable energy projects have a net positive impact on environmental health and sustainability. The Army’s experience conducting NEPA assessments for these projects provides a unique perspective on the effectiveness of the NEPA process, including challenges, best practices, and lessons learned that apply broadly to NEPA practitioners. This article illustrates specific examples through descriptions of NEPA assessments for three OEI projects at various stages of completion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
陆军土地上大规模可再生能源项目的NEPA评估:最佳实践和经验教训
美国国防部(DoD)等联邦土地持有机构正在积极寻求能源供应多样化,减少对化石燃料的依赖,同时提高能源安全性和弹性。在国防部内部,陆军能源倡议办公室(OEI)通过私营部门融资在陆军土地上开发大规模可再生能源和替代能源项目,努力实现这些目标。《国家环境政策法》的适当实施确保可再生能源项目对环境健康和可持续性产生净积极影响。陆军对这些项目进行NEPA评估的经验为NEPA过程的有效性提供了一个独特的视角,包括挑战、最佳实践和广泛应用于NEPA从业者的经验教训。本文通过描述在不同完成阶段的三个OEI项目的NEPA评估来举例说明具体的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Practice
Environmental Practice ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Environmental Practice provides a multidisciplinary forum for authoritative discussion and analysis of issues of wide interest to the international community of environmental professionals, with the intent of developing innovative solutions to environmental problems for public policy implementation, professional practice, or both. Peer-reviewed original research papers, environmental reviews, and commentaries, along with news articles, book reviews, and points of view, link findings in science and technology with issues of public policy, health, environmental quality, law, political economy, management, and the appropriate standards for expertise. Published for the National Association of Environmental Professionals
期刊最新文献
Anthropological approaches for cultural resource conservation design and planning Cultural resources and landscape conservation design and planning Moving beyond the ecosystem in ecosystem health report cards Food Loss and Food Waste, Causes and Solutions Last issue of Environmental Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1