Characterizing facial features in individuals with craniofacial microsomia: A systematic approach for clinical research.
C. Heike, Erin R. Wallace, M. Speltz, B. Siebold, M. Werler, A. Hing, C. Birgfeld, B. Collett, B. Leroux, D. Luquetti
{"title":"Characterizing facial features in individuals with craniofacial microsomia: A systematic approach for clinical research.","authors":"C. Heike, Erin R. Wallace, M. Speltz, B. Siebold, M. Werler, A. Hing, C. Birgfeld, B. Collett, B. Leroux, D. Luquetti","doi":"10.1002/bdra.23560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nCraniofacial microsomia (CFM) is a congenital condition with wide phenotypic variability, including hypoplasia of the mandible and external ear. We assembled a cohort of children with facial features within the CFM spectrum and children without known craniofacial anomalies. We sought to develop a standardized approach to assess and describe the facial characteristics of the study cohort, using multiple sources of information gathered over the course of this longitudinal study and to create case subgroups with shared phenotypic features.\n\n\nMETHODS\nParticipants were enrolled between 1996 and 2002. We classified the facial phenotype from photographs, ratings using a modified version of the Orbital, Ear, Mandible, Nerve, Soft tissue (OMENS) pictorial system, data from medical record abstraction, and health history questionnaires.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe participant sample included 142 cases and 290 controls. The average age was 13.5 years (standard deviation, 1.3 years; range, 11.1-17.1 years). Sixty-one percent of cases were male, 74% were white non-Hispanic. Among cases, the most common features were microtia (66%) and mandibular hypoplasia (50%). Case subgroups with meaningful group definitions included: (1) microtia without other CFM-related features (n = 24), (2) microtia with mandibular hypoplasia (n = 46), (3) other combinations of CFM- related facial features (n = 51), and (4) atypical features (n = 21).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nWe developed a standardized approach for integrating multiple data sources to phenotype individuals with CFM, and created subgroups based on clinically-meaningful, shared characteristics. We hope that this system can be used to explore associations between phenotype and clinical outcomes of children with CFM and to identify the etiology of CFM. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:915-926, 2016.© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.","PeriodicalId":8983,"journal":{"name":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","volume":"18 1","pages":"915-926"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.23560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Craniofacial microsomia (CFM) is a congenital condition with wide phenotypic variability, including hypoplasia of the mandible and external ear. We assembled a cohort of children with facial features within the CFM spectrum and children without known craniofacial anomalies. We sought to develop a standardized approach to assess and describe the facial characteristics of the study cohort, using multiple sources of information gathered over the course of this longitudinal study and to create case subgroups with shared phenotypic features.
METHODS
Participants were enrolled between 1996 and 2002. We classified the facial phenotype from photographs, ratings using a modified version of the Orbital, Ear, Mandible, Nerve, Soft tissue (OMENS) pictorial system, data from medical record abstraction, and health history questionnaires.
RESULTS
The participant sample included 142 cases and 290 controls. The average age was 13.5 years (standard deviation, 1.3 years; range, 11.1-17.1 years). Sixty-one percent of cases were male, 74% were white non-Hispanic. Among cases, the most common features were microtia (66%) and mandibular hypoplasia (50%). Case subgroups with meaningful group definitions included: (1) microtia without other CFM-related features (n = 24), (2) microtia with mandibular hypoplasia (n = 46), (3) other combinations of CFM- related facial features (n = 51), and (4) atypical features (n = 21).
CONCLUSION
We developed a standardized approach for integrating multiple data sources to phenotype individuals with CFM, and created subgroups based on clinically-meaningful, shared characteristics. We hope that this system can be used to explore associations between phenotype and clinical outcomes of children with CFM and to identify the etiology of CFM. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:915-926, 2016.© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
颅面短小症患者的面部特征表征:临床研究的系统方法。
颅面小畸形(CFM)是一种具有广泛表型变异的先天性疾病,包括下颌骨和外耳发育不全。我们收集了一组面部特征在CFM范围内的儿童和没有已知颅面异常的儿童。我们试图开发一种标准化的方法来评估和描述研究队列的面部特征,使用在这项纵向研究过程中收集的多种信息来源,并创建具有共同表型特征的病例亚组。方法研究对象于1996 - 2002年间入组。我们从照片中对面部表型进行分类,使用改进版本的眶、耳、下颌骨、神经、软组织(OMENS)图像系统进行评分,从医疗记录提取数据和健康史问卷中进行评分。结果纳入病例142例,对照组290例。平均年龄13.5岁(标准差1.3岁;范围:11.1-17.1年)。61%的病例为男性,74%为非西班牙裔白人。在病例中,最常见的特征是小畸形(66%)和下颌发育不全(50%)。具有有意义的组定义的病例亚组包括:(1)没有其他CFM相关特征的小个子畸形(n = 24),(2)伴有下颌发育不全的小个子畸形(n = 46),(3)其他CFM相关面部特征的组合(n = 51),(4)非典型特征(n = 21)。结论:我们开发了一种标准化的方法,将多个数据源整合到CFM个体的表型中,并基于有临床意义的共同特征创建了亚组。我们希望该系统可以用于探索儿童CFM的表型和临床结果之间的关系,并确定CFM的病因。出生缺陷研究(A辑)(06):915-926,2016。©2016 Wiley期刊公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。