D. Suharto, H. Botha, R. Haryanti, R. Wahyunengseh
{"title":"Community Marginalization as the Effect of Public Policy in Democratic Governance Era","authors":"D. Suharto, H. Botha, R. Haryanti, R. Wahyunengseh","doi":"10.20476/jbb.v25i3.9967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Watu Ata natural reserve is a natural reserve located in Ngada of Nusa Tenggara Timur Province. Watu Ata natural reserve was established based on Ministry of Forestry’s Decree Number 432/Kpts-II/92. The policy impacts negatively on community marginalization, particularly the elimination of people from their previous cultivated land. This research aimed to analyze the community marginalization occurring as a result of the policy establishing Watu Ata forest area to be conservation area functioning as natural reserve. This research was conducted in two villages namely Inelika Village and Heawea Village. The research method employed was qualitative one with descriptive approach. The type of data used is primary and secondary data. Sampling technique employed was purposive sampling one. Techniques of collecting data used were interview, observation, and documentation. Technique of analyzing data used Miles and Huberman’s data analysis technique (data reduction, data presentation, conclusion drawing and verification). The result of research showed that: 1) the form of marginalization the people felt surrounding Watu Ata natural reserve area was social exclusion from cultivated land. Social exclusion from cultivated land encountered by the people in Heawea and Inelika Villages impacts on other exclusion forms. 2) the attempt the people had taken to deal with marginalization was to establish an organization called PERMATA (Perhimpunan Masyarakat Watu Ata or Watu Ata People Association). The objective of getting fair distribution of forest resource and property certainty has not been achieved yet until today. In democratic governance era, government policy is ideally a dialogical product, government with community.","PeriodicalId":8986,"journal":{"name":"Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v25i3.9967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Watu Ata natural reserve is a natural reserve located in Ngada of Nusa Tenggara Timur Province. Watu Ata natural reserve was established based on Ministry of Forestry’s Decree Number 432/Kpts-II/92. The policy impacts negatively on community marginalization, particularly the elimination of people from their previous cultivated land. This research aimed to analyze the community marginalization occurring as a result of the policy establishing Watu Ata forest area to be conservation area functioning as natural reserve. This research was conducted in two villages namely Inelika Village and Heawea Village. The research method employed was qualitative one with descriptive approach. The type of data used is primary and secondary data. Sampling technique employed was purposive sampling one. Techniques of collecting data used were interview, observation, and documentation. Technique of analyzing data used Miles and Huberman’s data analysis technique (data reduction, data presentation, conclusion drawing and verification). The result of research showed that: 1) the form of marginalization the people felt surrounding Watu Ata natural reserve area was social exclusion from cultivated land. Social exclusion from cultivated land encountered by the people in Heawea and Inelika Villages impacts on other exclusion forms. 2) the attempt the people had taken to deal with marginalization was to establish an organization called PERMATA (Perhimpunan Masyarakat Watu Ata or Watu Ata People Association). The objective of getting fair distribution of forest resource and property certainty has not been achieved yet until today. In democratic governance era, government policy is ideally a dialogical product, government with community.
瓦图阿塔自然保护区是位于努沙登加拉帖木儿省恩嘎达的一个自然保护区。Watu Ata自然保护区是根据林业部第432/Kpts-II/92号法令建立的。该政策对社区边缘化产生了负面影响,特别是将人们从他们以前的耕地中消除。本研究旨在分析瓦图阿塔森林保护区作为自然保护区的政策所导致的社区边缘化。本研究在Inelika村和Heawea村两个村进行。研究方法采用定性描述法。使用的数据类型为主要数据和次要数据。采用有目的抽样技术。收集资料的方法为访谈、观察和文献。数据分析技术采用了Miles和Huberman的数据分析技术(数据简化、数据呈现、得出结论和验证)。研究结果表明:1)瓦图阿塔自然保护区周边人群感受到的边缘化形式为社会对耕地的排斥。Heawea村和Inelika村的人们所遭遇的耕地社会排斥对其他排斥形式产生了影响。2)人们试图解决边缘化问题的方法是建立一个名为PERMATA的组织(Perhimpunan Masyarakat Watu Ata或Watu Ata人民协会)。直到今天,森林资源公平分配和产权确定性的目标还没有实现。在民主治理时代,政府政策是理想的政府与社会对话的产物。