Reconstruction in Salvage Surgery for Head and Neck Cancers.

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-16 DOI:10.1177/19433875221109248
Nageswara R Noothanapati, Nisha R Akali, Rahul Buggaveeti, Deepak Balasubramanian, Jimmy Mathew, Subramania Iyer, Krishnakumar Thankappan
{"title":"Reconstruction in Salvage Surgery for Head and Neck Cancers.","authors":"Nageswara R Noothanapati, Nisha R Akali, Rahul Buggaveeti, Deepak Balasubramanian, Jimmy Mathew, Subramania Iyer, Krishnakumar Thankappan","doi":"10.1177/19433875221109248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Salvage surgery is the treatment option in recurrences and second primary tumors. This paper aimed to study the options and outcomes of reconstruction and the predictors of poor reconstructive outcomes in salvage surgery for head and neck cancers.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a retrospective study of all patients who underwent reconstructive flap surgery as part of salvage surgery for head and neck cancers between the years 2004 and 2017.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The initial treatment may be single modality radiotherapy or surgery or multimodality with combinations of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Any pathology that required surgical salvage was included. Any procedures done purely as reconstructive surgery were excluded. Predictor variables included demographical, clinical, and treatment factors. The outcome parameter was the occurrence of any flap-related complication or not. The complications and morbidity related to the procedures are reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-three patients underwent loco-regional flaps (LRF group), and 100 had free flaps (FF group). Pectoralis major flap was the commonest flap used in 68 patients (73.1%). Anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap was the commonest free flap and comprised 41% of the FF group. Any skin-related complication was seen in 35 patients (37.6%) and 41 (41%), respectively, in LRF and FF subsets. Any flap-related complication was seen in 16 patients (17.2%) and 29 patients (29%), respectively, in LRF and FF subsets. A summary measure \"any one of the complications\" was seen in 46 (49.5%) and 57 (57%), respectively, in LRF and FF subsets. Univariate and multivariate analysis for any flap-related complication identified no statistically significant predictor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Soft tissue flaps were preferred in salvage reconstruction, though the defects had a bony component. In the microvascular free flap reconstruction era, pectoralis major flap has shifted its role from a \"workhorse flap\" to a \"salvage flap.\" About half of the patients develop some complications. Flap-related complications are also common. In salvage surgery, it is important that an appropriate flap is selected, suitable for the setting, according to the indications, neck, and patient conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875221109248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Salvage surgery is the treatment option in recurrences and second primary tumors. This paper aimed to study the options and outcomes of reconstruction and the predictors of poor reconstructive outcomes in salvage surgery for head and neck cancers.

Study design: This is a retrospective study of all patients who underwent reconstructive flap surgery as part of salvage surgery for head and neck cancers between the years 2004 and 2017.

Methods: The initial treatment may be single modality radiotherapy or surgery or multimodality with combinations of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Any pathology that required surgical salvage was included. Any procedures done purely as reconstructive surgery were excluded. Predictor variables included demographical, clinical, and treatment factors. The outcome parameter was the occurrence of any flap-related complication or not. The complications and morbidity related to the procedures are reported.

Results: Ninety-three patients underwent loco-regional flaps (LRF group), and 100 had free flaps (FF group). Pectoralis major flap was the commonest flap used in 68 patients (73.1%). Anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap was the commonest free flap and comprised 41% of the FF group. Any skin-related complication was seen in 35 patients (37.6%) and 41 (41%), respectively, in LRF and FF subsets. Any flap-related complication was seen in 16 patients (17.2%) and 29 patients (29%), respectively, in LRF and FF subsets. A summary measure "any one of the complications" was seen in 46 (49.5%) and 57 (57%), respectively, in LRF and FF subsets. Univariate and multivariate analysis for any flap-related complication identified no statistically significant predictor.

Conclusions: Soft tissue flaps were preferred in salvage reconstruction, though the defects had a bony component. In the microvascular free flap reconstruction era, pectoralis major flap has shifted its role from a "workhorse flap" to a "salvage flap." About half of the patients develop some complications. Flap-related complications are also common. In salvage surgery, it is important that an appropriate flap is selected, suitable for the setting, according to the indications, neck, and patient conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
头颈部肿瘤抢救手术中的重建。
简介:挽救性手术是复发和第二原发肿瘤的治疗选择。本文旨在研究头颈癌保留手术重建的选择和结果,以及重建不良结果的预测因素。研究设计:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是2004年至2017年期间接受重建皮瓣手术作为头颈癌抢救手术一部分的所有患者。方法:初始治疗可采用单模态放疗或手术或多模态手术、放疗、化疗联合治疗。任何需要手术挽救的病理都包括在内。任何纯粹的重建手术都被排除在外。预测变量包括人口学、临床和治疗因素。结果参数为是否发生任何皮瓣相关并发症。报告了与手术相关的并发症和发病率。结果:局部皮瓣组93例(LRF组),游离皮瓣组100例(FF组)。胸大肌瓣是68例患者中最常用的皮瓣(73.1%)。股骨前外侧皮瓣(ALT)是最常见的游离皮瓣,占FF组的41%。在LRF和FF亚群中,分别有35例(37.6%)和41例(41%)患者出现皮肤相关并发症。在LRF和FF亚群中,分别有16例(17.2%)和29例(29%)患者出现皮瓣相关并发症。在LRF和FF亚群中,分别有46例(49.5%)和57例(57%)出现“任何一种并发症”。任何皮瓣相关并发症的单因素和多因素分析均未发现有统计学意义的预测因子。结论:软组织瓣是修复性重建的首选,尽管缺损有骨成分。在微血管游离皮瓣重建时代,胸大肌皮瓣的角色已经从“主力皮瓣”转变为“救助皮瓣”。大约一半的患者会出现一些并发症。皮瓣相关并发症也很常见。在抢救手术中,根据适应症、颈部和患者情况选择合适的皮瓣是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Anatomical Landmarks and Branching Patterns of the Greater Auricular Nerve. Revision Surgery With Refixation After Mandibular Fractures. A Single Center Experience: A Retrospective Study Over 10-Years Period on Mandible Fractures. Comparing Current Practice Habits for Treatment of Subcondylar Fracture Among Craniomaxillofacial Surgeons. Patterns of Midface and Mandible Fractures in a Government Hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1