A Framework for Evaluating Renewable Energy for Decision-Making Integrating a Hybrid FAHP-TOPSIS Approach: A Case Study in Valle del Cauca, Colombia

IF 2.7 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, ATOMIC, MOLECULAR & CHEMICAL Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables Pub Date : 2023-08-30 DOI:10.3390/data8090137
Mateo Barrera-Zapata, Fabian Zuñiga-Cortes, Eduardo Caicedo-Bravo
{"title":"A Framework for Evaluating Renewable Energy for Decision-Making Integrating a Hybrid FAHP-TOPSIS Approach: A Case Study in Valle del Cauca, Colombia","authors":"Mateo Barrera-Zapata, Fabian Zuñiga-Cortes, Eduardo Caicedo-Bravo","doi":"10.3390/data8090137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At present, the energy landscape of many countries faces transformational challenges driven by sustainable development objectives, supported by the implementation of clean technologies, such as renewable energy sources, to meet the flexibility and diversification needs of the traditional energy mix. However, integrating these technologies requires a thorough study of the context in which they are developed. Furthermore, it is necessary to carry out an analysis from a sustainable approach that quantifies the impact of proposals on multiple objectives established by stakeholders. This article presents a framework for analysis that integrates a method for evaluating the technical feasibility of resources for photovoltaic solar, wind, small hydroelectric power, and biomass generation. These resources are used to construct a set of alternatives and are evaluated using a hybrid FAHP-TOPSIS approach. FAHP-TOPSIS is used as a comparison technique among a collection of technical, economic, and environmental criteria, ranking the alternatives considering their level of trade-off between criteria. The results of a case study in Valle del Cauca (Colombia) offer a wide range of alternatives and indicate a combination of 50% biomass, and 50% solar as the best, assisting in decision-making for the correct use of available resources and maximizing the benefits for stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":55580,"journal":{"name":"Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/data8090137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, ATOMIC, MOLECULAR & CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At present, the energy landscape of many countries faces transformational challenges driven by sustainable development objectives, supported by the implementation of clean technologies, such as renewable energy sources, to meet the flexibility and diversification needs of the traditional energy mix. However, integrating these technologies requires a thorough study of the context in which they are developed. Furthermore, it is necessary to carry out an analysis from a sustainable approach that quantifies the impact of proposals on multiple objectives established by stakeholders. This article presents a framework for analysis that integrates a method for evaluating the technical feasibility of resources for photovoltaic solar, wind, small hydroelectric power, and biomass generation. These resources are used to construct a set of alternatives and are evaluated using a hybrid FAHP-TOPSIS approach. FAHP-TOPSIS is used as a comparison technique among a collection of technical, economic, and environmental criteria, ranking the alternatives considering their level of trade-off between criteria. The results of a case study in Valle del Cauca (Colombia) offer a wide range of alternatives and indicate a combination of 50% biomass, and 50% solar as the best, assisting in decision-making for the correct use of available resources and maximizing the benefits for stakeholders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整合混合FAHP-TOPSIS方法的可再生能源决策评估框架:哥伦比亚考卡谷案例研究
目前,在可持续发展目标的推动下,在可再生能源等清洁技术的实施支持下,许多国家的能源格局面临变革性挑战,以满足传统能源结构的灵活性和多样化需求。然而,集成这些技术需要对开发它们的环境进行彻底的研究。此外,有必要从可持续的方法进行分析,量化提案对利益相关者建立的多个目标的影响。本文提出了一个分析框架,该框架集成了评估光伏太阳能、风能、小型水力发电和生物质能发电资源技术可行性的方法。这些资源用于构建一组备选方案,并使用混合FAHP-TOPSIS方法进行评估。FAHP-TOPSIS被用作技术、经济和环境标准集合之间的比较技术,根据标准之间的权衡程度对备选方案进行排名。哥伦比亚考卡谷(Valle del Cauca)的一项案例研究的结果提供了广泛的替代方案,并表明50%生物质和50%太阳能的组合是最佳的,这有助于正确利用现有资源的决策,并使利益相关者的利益最大化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables
Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 物理-物理:核物理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
27
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables presents compilations of experimental and theoretical information in atomic physics, nuclear physics, and closely related fields. The journal is devoted to the publication of tables and graphs of general usefulness to researchers in both basic and applied areas. Extensive ... click here for full Aims & Scope Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables presents compilations of experimental and theoretical information in atomic physics, nuclear physics, and closely related fields. The journal is devoted to the publication of tables and graphs of general usefulness to researchers in both basic and applied areas. Extensive and comprehensive compilations of experimental and theoretical results are featured.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Subshell gaps and onsets of collectivity from proton and neutron pairing gap correlations Matrix elements for spin-orbit couplings in KRb Fine structure transitions with spectral features in Fe V and Fe VI Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1