Surgical wound dehiscence following cutaneous excisions: A retrospective study and review of the literature

Jennifer Seyffert, T. Harding, A. Sanghvi, Nathan Bibliowicz, Martin Yungmann, Shawn Camner, Matt L. Leavitt, J. Solomon
{"title":"Surgical wound dehiscence following cutaneous excisions: A retrospective study and review of the literature","authors":"Jennifer Seyffert, T. Harding, A. Sanghvi, Nathan Bibliowicz, Martin Yungmann, Shawn Camner, Matt L. Leavitt, J. Solomon","doi":"10.4103/jdds.jdds_71_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Surgical wound dehiscence (SWD) is the third most common adverse event following dermatologic surgery. There have been no previous studies investigating risk factors for SWD following dermatologic surgery. There are no formal recommendations or standards of care to minimize or prevent SWD following dermatologic surgery. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors associated with dermatologic SWD. Methods: Multicenter retrospective data mined from EMA electronic medical record were collected from 22,548 matched excisions and postoperative visits performed on patients ≥18 years between January 1, 2019, and September 27, 2019. Matched data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25 to elucidate factors associated with SWD. Results: The prevalence of SWD was calculated to be 0.55%. A wound reported as positive for presumed infection or postoperative bleeding had 14.48 and 20.15 times the odds, respectively, of also being positive for SWD. A wound located on distal extremities (arm, hand, and lower leg) had 1.86 times the odds of being positive for SWD. Increasing age was found to be statistically significant. Wounds on individuals 80 years of age or greater had 1.7064 times the odds of being positive for SWD. Data did not support a correlation between SWD and sex, SWD and diabetes, or SWD and provider type. Conclusion: Factors that contribute to SWD dehiscence include presence of presumed infection, presence of bleeding, age >80, and location on the distal extremity. Data did not support a correlation between SWD and sex, SWD and diabetes, or SWD and provider type. Dermatologic surgeon identification and reduction of risk factors contributing to this adverse event may prevent SWD.","PeriodicalId":15535,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery","volume":"34 6 1","pages":"93 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jdds.jdds_71_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical wound dehiscence (SWD) is the third most common adverse event following dermatologic surgery. There have been no previous studies investigating risk factors for SWD following dermatologic surgery. There are no formal recommendations or standards of care to minimize or prevent SWD following dermatologic surgery. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors associated with dermatologic SWD. Methods: Multicenter retrospective data mined from EMA electronic medical record were collected from 22,548 matched excisions and postoperative visits performed on patients ≥18 years between January 1, 2019, and September 27, 2019. Matched data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25 to elucidate factors associated with SWD. Results: The prevalence of SWD was calculated to be 0.55%. A wound reported as positive for presumed infection or postoperative bleeding had 14.48 and 20.15 times the odds, respectively, of also being positive for SWD. A wound located on distal extremities (arm, hand, and lower leg) had 1.86 times the odds of being positive for SWD. Increasing age was found to be statistically significant. Wounds on individuals 80 years of age or greater had 1.7064 times the odds of being positive for SWD. Data did not support a correlation between SWD and sex, SWD and diabetes, or SWD and provider type. Conclusion: Factors that contribute to SWD dehiscence include presence of presumed infection, presence of bleeding, age >80, and location on the distal extremity. Data did not support a correlation between SWD and sex, SWD and diabetes, or SWD and provider type. Dermatologic surgeon identification and reduction of risk factors contributing to this adverse event may prevent SWD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
皮肤切除后的外科伤口裂开:一项回顾性研究和文献回顾
背景:外科伤口裂开(SWD)是继皮肤外科手术后第三大最常见的不良事件。以前没有研究调查皮肤外科手术后SWD的危险因素。没有正式的建议或护理标准来减少或预防皮肤手术后的SWD。目的:本研究的目的是确定与皮肤SWD相关的危险因素。方法:从EMA电子病历中挖掘多中心回顾性数据,收集2019年1月1日至2019年9月27日期间22,548例≥18岁患者的匹配切除和术后就诊数据。采用IBM SPSS Statistics 25进行配对数据分析,以阐明与SWD相关的因素。结果:计算出SWD患病率为0.55%。被报告为感染或术后出血阳性的伤口,SWD阳性的几率分别是14.48倍和20.15倍。位于远端肢体(手臂、手和小腿)的伤口是SWD阳性几率的1.86倍。年龄的增加在统计学上是显著的。80岁或以上的人的伤口是SWD阳性几率的1.7064倍。数据不支持SWD与性别、SWD与糖尿病或SWD与提供者类型之间的相关性。结论:导致SWD破裂的因素包括疑似感染、出血、年龄在80岁以下和位置在远端肢体。数据不支持SWD与性别、SWD与糖尿病或SWD与提供者类型之间的相关性。皮肤科外科医生识别和减少导致这一不良事件的危险因素可能会预防SWD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Depression among adolescents with acne vulgaris: A cross-sectional assessment Purse-String closure on the chest, a cosmetically appealing alternative Cosmetic dermatology training: Perceptions and experiences of dermatologists and residents in Saudi Arabia An evaluation of the management of hirsutism in public versus private outpatient departments in Saudi Arabia Hypopigmented pityriasis lichenoides: A new clinicopathological type
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1