Significance of Luminex-crossmatch assay and its mean fluorescence intensity - a retrospective observation in 380 renal transplant cases.

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY Polish Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2022-04-30 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0015.6985
P. Pandey, A. Pande, Smriti Mishra, D. Setya, A. Devra, V. Sinha, A. Bhatt
{"title":"Significance of Luminex-crossmatch assay and its mean fluorescence intensity - a retrospective observation in 380 renal transplant cases.","authors":"P. Pandey, A. Pande, Smriti Mishra, D. Setya, A. Devra, V. Sinha, A. Bhatt","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.6985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Cell-based complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-XM) and solid phase assays were introduced for assessing HLA antibodies. However, the complexity of data from cell-based and solid phase assays have led to potential confusion about how to use the results for clinical decision making. Aim: Aim of this study was to compare results of cell-based assay and solid phase assay, to evaluate the usefulness of L-XM for pretransplant detection of HLA class I and II donor-specific IgG antibodies, correlate the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of class I and class II L-XM assay and with CDC-XM and L-PRA (panel reactive antibodies) results. Methods: In this retrospective study, 380 prospective renal transplant recipients were tested for the presence of HLA antibodies by CDC-XM, IgG-L-XM, IgG-L-PRA & L-SAB screening with their corresponding donor. Results: Fifty-one recipients (13.42%) had a positive CDC-XM. L-XM was positive in 125 recipients (32.89%); class I-L-XM was positive in 46 (36.80%) cases, and class II-L-XM was positive in 58 (46.4%) cases and 21 (16.8%) samples were positive for class I and class II. High background was present in 22 (5.87%) samples, the results of which were confirmed by retesting or by correlation with L-PRA and L-SAB assays. Conclusion: The introduction of more sensitive approaches for the detection of anti-HLA-IgG-antibodies, such as L-XM and L-PRA assay, has allowed the identification of anti-HLA-antibodies in recipient serum which is not usually identified by CDC-XM alone. However, L-XM has some limitations; they can be overcome if we combine this assay with L-PRA.","PeriodicalId":43422,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Surgery","volume":"52 1","pages":"38-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.6985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Cell-based complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-XM) and solid phase assays were introduced for assessing HLA antibodies. However, the complexity of data from cell-based and solid phase assays have led to potential confusion about how to use the results for clinical decision making. Aim: Aim of this study was to compare results of cell-based assay and solid phase assay, to evaluate the usefulness of L-XM for pretransplant detection of HLA class I and II donor-specific IgG antibodies, correlate the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of class I and class II L-XM assay and with CDC-XM and L-PRA (panel reactive antibodies) results. Methods: In this retrospective study, 380 prospective renal transplant recipients were tested for the presence of HLA antibodies by CDC-XM, IgG-L-XM, IgG-L-PRA & L-SAB screening with their corresponding donor. Results: Fifty-one recipients (13.42%) had a positive CDC-XM. L-XM was positive in 125 recipients (32.89%); class I-L-XM was positive in 46 (36.80%) cases, and class II-L-XM was positive in 58 (46.4%) cases and 21 (16.8%) samples were positive for class I and class II. High background was present in 22 (5.87%) samples, the results of which were confirmed by retesting or by correlation with L-PRA and L-SAB assays. Conclusion: The introduction of more sensitive approaches for the detection of anti-HLA-IgG-antibodies, such as L-XM and L-PRA assay, has allowed the identification of anti-HLA-antibodies in recipient serum which is not usually identified by CDC-XM alone. However, L-XM has some limitations; they can be overcome if we combine this assay with L-PRA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
380例肾移植病例luminex交叉配合法及其平均荧光强度的回顾性观察。
介绍:基于细胞的补体依赖性细胞毒性交叉匹配(CDC-XM)和固相测定法被用于评估HLA抗体。然而,基于细胞和固相测定的数据的复杂性导致了如何将结果用于临床决策的潜在混乱。目的:本研究的目的是比较细胞法和固相法的结果,评价L-XM在移植前检测HLAⅰ类和ⅱ类供体特异性IgG抗体的有效性,将ⅰ类和ⅱ类L-XM法的平均荧光强度(MFI)值与dc - xm和L-PRA(面板反应性抗体)结果相关联。方法:回顾性研究380例准肾移植受者与相应供者通过CDC-XM、IgG-L-XM、IgG-L-PRA和L-SAB筛查进行HLA抗体检测。结果:51例受者(13.42%)CDC-XM阳性。L-XM阳性125例(32.89%);I- l - xm类46例(36.80%)阳性,II- l - xm类58例(46.4%)阳性,I类和II类21例(16.8%)阳性。22份(5.87%)样品存在高本底,经复验或与L-PRA和L-SAB测定的相关性证实。结论:L-XM、L-PRA等检测hla - igg抗体的更灵敏方法的引入,使受体血清中抗hla抗体的鉴定成为可能,而这些抗体通常仅通过CDC-XM无法鉴定。但是,L-XM有一些限制;如果我们将这个实验与L-PRA结合起来,它们就可以被克服。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊最新文献
Non-metallic foreign bodies - diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties. Surgical removal of Aquafilling localized to different sites Experience in the use of endovenous methods and cell technologies in the treatment of trophic defects in patients with chronic venous insufficiency C6 Application of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) in treatment of gastrointestinal lesions- single center experience. Sequential, ultrasound-guided, minimally invasive pit-picking procedure with Nd:YAGlaser epilation treatment for pilonidal disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1