The rationality of scientific reasoning in the context of pursuit: Drawing appropriate distinctions

Q4 Arts and Humanities Argumenta Philosophica Pub Date : 2012-01-02 DOI:10.21825/philosophica.82146
Dunja Šešelja, Laszlo Kosolosky, Christian Straßer
{"title":"The rationality of scientific reasoning in the context of pursuit: Drawing appropriate distinctions","authors":"Dunja Šešelja, Laszlo Kosolosky, Christian Straßer","doi":"10.21825/philosophica.82146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to disambiguate between different notions of pursuit worthiness regarding scientific inquiries. To this end we propose a unifying pattern of pursuit worthiness: “It is rational for Y to pursue X if and only if pursuing X is conducive of the set of goals Z.” By showing in which ways variables X, Y, and Z can be changed, we present different notions of pursuit and pursuit worthiness. With respect to variable X, we distinguish the pursuit of scientific theories, epistemic objects, and technological developments. With respect to variable Z, we distinguish between epistemic and practical pursuit worthiness. Finally, with respect to variable Y, we distinguish between individual and communal pursuit worthiness. By means of these distinctions we are able to explicate some of the major ambiguities underlying the concept of pursuit of pursuit worthiness, as well as to shed light on some confusions in philosophical literature that have resulted from their neglect. 52 D. SesELJA, L. KOSOLOSKY & C. STRASSER","PeriodicalId":36843,"journal":{"name":"Argumenta Philosophica","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argumenta Philosophica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to disambiguate between different notions of pursuit worthiness regarding scientific inquiries. To this end we propose a unifying pattern of pursuit worthiness: “It is rational for Y to pursue X if and only if pursuing X is conducive of the set of goals Z.” By showing in which ways variables X, Y, and Z can be changed, we present different notions of pursuit and pursuit worthiness. With respect to variable X, we distinguish the pursuit of scientific theories, epistemic objects, and technological developments. With respect to variable Z, we distinguish between epistemic and practical pursuit worthiness. Finally, with respect to variable Y, we distinguish between individual and communal pursuit worthiness. By means of these distinctions we are able to explicate some of the major ambiguities underlying the concept of pursuit of pursuit worthiness, as well as to shed light on some confusions in philosophical literature that have resulted from their neglect. 52 D. SesELJA, L. KOSOLOSKY & C. STRASSER
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
追求背景下科学推理的合理性:适当的区分
本文的目的是消除关于科学探究的追求价值的不同概念之间的歧义。为此,我们提出了一个追求价值的统一模式:“当且仅当追求X有利于目标Z时,Y追求X是合理的。”通过展示变量X、Y和Z可以改变的方式,我们提出了追求和追求价值的不同概念。关于变量X,我们区分了对科学理论、认知对象和技术发展的追求。对于变量Z,我们区分了认知价值和实践追求价值。最后,关于变量Y,我们区分个人追求价值和集体追求价值。通过这些区别,我们能够解释追求追求价值这一概念背后的一些主要模糊之处,同时也能阐明哲学文献中由于忽视这一概念而造成的一些混乱。[52]谢谢嘉,柯索洛斯基,史特拉瑟
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Argumenta Philosophica
Argumenta Philosophica Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Naturalisme et scepticisme Naturalismo e cosmopolitismo nell’Antichità Il naturalismo oggi Onnipotenza divina e ordine naturale nel Medioevo La natura e gli stati abituali nell’Etica Nicomachea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1