A Critique of Ladd’s ‘Already but not Yet’ View of the Kingdom

Q1 Arts and Humanities Koers Pub Date : 2022-11-24 DOI:10.19108/koers...2531
Jacob J Scholtz
{"title":"A Critique of Ladd’s ‘Already but not Yet’ View of the Kingdom","authors":"Jacob J Scholtz","doi":"10.19108/koers...2531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The kingdom of God is an important subject for theology and for a Christian worldview. As one of the most influential theologians of the twentieth century, George Eldon Ladd is arguably the father of the widely held ‘already but not yet’ view of the kingdom. Ladd contends that the kingdom can be both present and future at the same. The key to Ladd’s theory is his definition of the kingdom. If the kingdom can be present and future at the same time, Ladd realises that logically it cannot also be so in the same sense. Therefore, he postulates that Jesus offered a new and unexpected form of the kingdom, arguing that the New Testament radically reinterprets the Old Testament and calling this the mystery of the kingdom. This article critiques Ladd’s definition of the kingdom. The kingdom cannot logically be present and future at the same time. Moreover, Jesus did not offer a new ‘form’ of the kingdom. Regarding the mediatorial kingdom of God, the missing key is the word ‘conditional’.","PeriodicalId":38057,"journal":{"name":"Koers","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19108/koers...2531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The kingdom of God is an important subject for theology and for a Christian worldview. As one of the most influential theologians of the twentieth century, George Eldon Ladd is arguably the father of the widely held ‘already but not yet’ view of the kingdom. Ladd contends that the kingdom can be both present and future at the same. The key to Ladd’s theory is his definition of the kingdom. If the kingdom can be present and future at the same time, Ladd realises that logically it cannot also be so in the same sense. Therefore, he postulates that Jesus offered a new and unexpected form of the kingdom, arguing that the New Testament radically reinterprets the Old Testament and calling this the mystery of the kingdom. This article critiques Ladd’s definition of the kingdom. The kingdom cannot logically be present and future at the same time. Moreover, Jesus did not offer a new ‘form’ of the kingdom. Regarding the mediatorial kingdom of God, the missing key is the word ‘conditional’.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉德的“已经但尚未”王国观批判
神的国是神学和基督教世界观的一个重要主题。作为20世纪最具影响力的神学家之一,乔治·埃尔登·拉德可以说是广受欢迎的"已经但尚未"王国观之父。拉德认为,王国可以同时存在于现在和未来。拉德理论的关键在于他对王国的定义。如果王国可以同时存在于现在和未来,拉德意识到,从逻辑上讲,它不可能同时存在于同一意义上。因此,他假设耶稣提供了一个新的,意想不到的王国形式,认为新约从根本上重新解释了旧约,并称之为王国的奥秘。这篇文章批判了拉德对王国的定义。从逻辑上讲,神的国不可能同时存在于现在和将来。此外,耶稣并没有提供一个王国的新“形式”。关于神的中保王国,缺失的关键是“有条件的”这个词。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Koers
Koers Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Restorative Justice as a missional call in South African intercultural context and beyond. Habermas and the Caring Society: A Trans-disciplinary Feminist Critique The mis-appropriation of Abraham Kuyper’s ideas about “worldview” by American Evangelical Christians Gereformeerde pietisme, neoplatonisme en pre-Romantieke teodisee in die Voortrekkervrou Susanna Smit (1799-1863) se godsdienstige dagboeke Die rapportering van beserings in Meganiese Tegnologie-skoolwerkswinkels met die oog op die skep van `n geborgenheidsruimte vir die leerders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1