T. Williams, Daniel G. Brown, S. Guikema, T. Logan, N. Magliocca, Birgit Müller, C. Steger
{"title":"Integrating Equity Considerations into Agent-Based Modeling: A Conceptual Framework and Practical Guidance","authors":"T. Williams, Daniel G. Brown, S. Guikema, T. Logan, N. Magliocca, Birgit Müller, C. Steger","doi":"10.18564/jasss.4816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Advancing equity is a complex challenge for society, science, and policy. Agent-based models are increasingly used as scientific tools to advance understanding of systems, inform decision-making, and share knowledge. Yet, equity has not received due attention within the agent-based modeling (ABM) literature. In this paper, wedevelopaconceptualframeworkandprovideguidanceforintegratingequityconsiderationsintoABM researchandmodelingpractice. TheframeworkconceptualizesABMasinterfacingwithequityoutcomesattwo levels(thescience-societyinterfaceandwithinthemodelitself)andthemodelerasa filter and lens thatprojects knowledge between the target system and the model. Within the framework, we outline three complementary, equity-advancing action pathways: (1) engage stakeholders, (2) acknowledge positionality and bias, and (3) assessequitywithagent-basedmodels. ForPathway1,wesummarizeexistingguidancewithintheparticipatory modeling literature. For Pathway 2, we introduce the positionality and bias document as a tool to promote modeler and stakeholder reflexivity throughout the modeling process. For Pathway 3, we synthesize a typology of approaches for modeling equity and offer a set of preliminary suggestions for best practice. By engaging with these action pathways, modelers both reduce the risks of inadvertently perpetuating inequity and harness the opportunities for ABM to play a larger role in creating a more equitable future.","PeriodicalId":14675,"journal":{"name":"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.4816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
: Advancing equity is a complex challenge for society, science, and policy. Agent-based models are increasingly used as scientific tools to advance understanding of systems, inform decision-making, and share knowledge. Yet, equity has not received due attention within the agent-based modeling (ABM) literature. In this paper, wedevelopaconceptualframeworkandprovideguidanceforintegratingequityconsiderationsintoABM researchandmodelingpractice. TheframeworkconceptualizesABMasinterfacingwithequityoutcomesattwo levels(thescience-societyinterfaceandwithinthemodelitself)andthemodelerasa filter and lens thatprojects knowledge between the target system and the model. Within the framework, we outline three complementary, equity-advancing action pathways: (1) engage stakeholders, (2) acknowledge positionality and bias, and (3) assessequitywithagent-basedmodels. ForPathway1,wesummarizeexistingguidancewithintheparticipatory modeling literature. For Pathway 2, we introduce the positionality and bias document as a tool to promote modeler and stakeholder reflexivity throughout the modeling process. For Pathway 3, we synthesize a typology of approaches for modeling equity and offer a set of preliminary suggestions for best practice. By engaging with these action pathways, modelers both reduce the risks of inadvertently perpetuating inequity and harness the opportunities for ABM to play a larger role in creating a more equitable future.