META-ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF THE EDUCATIONAL AND COUNSELING INTERVENTIONS ON MENTAL ADJUSTMENT AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN BREAST CANCER

Ahmed Al-hidary, K. Hayati, N. Mz, Huda Bassalim Faisal Ali Zubaidah Jamil Osman, M. H. Juni
{"title":"META-ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF THE EDUCATIONAL AND COUNSELING INTERVENTIONS ON MENTAL ADJUSTMENT AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN BREAST CANCER","authors":"Ahmed Al-hidary, K. Hayati, N. Mz, Huda Bassalim Faisal Ali Zubaidah Jamil Osman, M. H. Juni","doi":"10.32827/ijphcs.6.5.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Education and counselling are widely used independently or as supplementary components in the psychosocial interventions. However, there is a certain level of ambiguity if used separately. In this analysis, we attempted to answer the following question; “Does the education and counseling support improve of the adjustment to cancer in women diagnosed with breast cancer?” Methods: An online search was undertaken in 12 databases for the longitudinal studies for the period from January 2007 to March 2018. The effects of the interventions on the adjustment to breast cancer, were calculated based on the results of the mental adjustment and quality of life (QoL). Three distinct periods were examined; baseline, three months, and six months. The methodological quality, risk of bias, publication bias, and attrition rate were examined. Meta-analysis was carried out using Review Manager 5.3 with the results graphically presented. Results: A comprehensive systematic review was conducted for 5,464 titles, of which 22 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, however 14 studies completed the data and included in the qualitative synthesis; included 3,419 patients. The mean of overall attrition rate in both groups was 14.37% (SE= 2.87, median= 12.28). In mental adjustment, the total mean differences for the three trials were statistically significant 0.40 (0.24 to 0.57). For the QoL, the mean differences of the three trials were statistically non-significant 0.18 (-0.48 to 0.84). Conclusion: The educational and/or counseling interventions can be beneficial and useful for patients to adapt with the breast cancer, however, it is less effective on the QoL. Keywords: mental adjustment, quality of life, education, counseling","PeriodicalId":14315,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32827/ijphcs.6.5.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Education and counselling are widely used independently or as supplementary components in the psychosocial interventions. However, there is a certain level of ambiguity if used separately. In this analysis, we attempted to answer the following question; “Does the education and counseling support improve of the adjustment to cancer in women diagnosed with breast cancer?” Methods: An online search was undertaken in 12 databases for the longitudinal studies for the period from January 2007 to March 2018. The effects of the interventions on the adjustment to breast cancer, were calculated based on the results of the mental adjustment and quality of life (QoL). Three distinct periods were examined; baseline, three months, and six months. The methodological quality, risk of bias, publication bias, and attrition rate were examined. Meta-analysis was carried out using Review Manager 5.3 with the results graphically presented. Results: A comprehensive systematic review was conducted for 5,464 titles, of which 22 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, however 14 studies completed the data and included in the qualitative synthesis; included 3,419 patients. The mean of overall attrition rate in both groups was 14.37% (SE= 2.87, median= 12.28). In mental adjustment, the total mean differences for the three trials were statistically significant 0.40 (0.24 to 0.57). For the QoL, the mean differences of the three trials were statistically non-significant 0.18 (-0.48 to 0.84). Conclusion: The educational and/or counseling interventions can be beneficial and useful for patients to adapt with the breast cancer, however, it is less effective on the QoL. Keywords: mental adjustment, quality of life, education, counseling
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育和咨询干预对乳腺癌患者心理适应和生活质量影响的meta分析
背景:教育和咨询在社会心理干预中被广泛独立使用或作为补充部分。但是,如果单独使用,会产生一定程度的歧义。在这个分析中,我们试图回答以下问题;“教育和咨询支持是否能改善诊断为乳腺癌的女性对癌症的适应?”方法:在线检索2007年1月至2018年3月期间12个数据库的纵向研究。根据心理调整和生活质量(QoL)的结果计算干预措施对乳腺癌适应的影响。研究了三个不同的时期;基线,三个月,六个月。对方法学质量、偏倚风险、发表偏倚和损耗率进行了检查。使用Review Manager 5.3进行meta分析,结果以图表形式呈现。结果:对5464篇文献进行了系统综合评价,其中22篇文献符合纳入标准,但有14篇文献完成了资料并被纳入定性综合;纳入3419例患者。两组总损耗率平均值为14.37% (SE= 2.87,中位数= 12.28)。在心理适应方面,三个试验的总平均差异有统计学意义0.40(0.24 ~ 0.57)。对于生活质量,三个试验的平均差异无统计学意义,分别为0.18(-0.48 ~ 0.84)。结论:教育和/或咨询干预对患者适应乳腺癌是有益的,但对生活质量的影响较小。关键词:心理调适,生活质量,教育,咨询
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors Associated with the Incidence of COVID-19: A Case Control Study in Tasikmalaya, Indonesia Proficiency, Psychological Wellbeing, and Coping of the College Freshmen of the University of Nueva Caceres Potential of Harum Manis Mango (Mangifera Indica L.) Seed Extract for Nosocomial Infections Stress and Burnout among Medical Workers in Indonesia: A Study during COVID-19 Pandemic Artificial Intelligence and Mental Health Issues: A Narrative Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1