Wizualizacja jako filozofia: czy wizualizacje mieszczą się w skrzynce narzędziowej filozofa?

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Avant Pub Date : 2023-08-27 DOI:10.26913/ava3202304
Monika Favara-Kurkowski
{"title":"Wizualizacja jako filozofia: czy wizualizacje mieszczą się w skrzynce narzędziowej filozofa?","authors":"Monika Favara-Kurkowski","doi":"10.26913/ava3202304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investigating the role of visualizations in science (broadly defined) is a meta-scientific question, a self-reflexive inquiry into, among other things, the method of research activity itself. In the field of philosophy, such a self-reflective inquiry can be illustrated by the following questions: Can visualiza-tions express philosophical content? Can visualizations serve as philosophical arguments? In this article, I will discuss—also with the help of a poster—some of the weaknesses of a certain anticognitivist line of argument against considering visualizations as philosophical argumentative tools.","PeriodicalId":43453,"journal":{"name":"Avant","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avant","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26913/ava3202304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Investigating the role of visualizations in science (broadly defined) is a meta-scientific question, a self-reflexive inquiry into, among other things, the method of research activity itself. In the field of philosophy, such a self-reflective inquiry can be illustrated by the following questions: Can visualiza-tions express philosophical content? Can visualizations serve as philosophical arguments? In this article, I will discuss—also with the help of a poster—some of the weaknesses of a certain anticognitivist line of argument against considering visualizations as philosophical argumentative tools.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究可视化在科学(广义)中的作用是一个元科学问题,是对研究活动方法本身的一种自我反思式的探究。在哲学领域,这种自我反思的探究可以用以下问题来说明:形象化能否表达哲学内容?可视化可以作为哲学论证吗?在这篇文章中,我将通过海报的帮助,讨论一些反对将可视化视为哲学论证工具的反认知主义论证路线的弱点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Avant
Avant HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
From Cultured Chats to the Chirrups of Choo-Choo-Da-Choos, or How We Found a Key to the Gate of Eden Borrowed Time: Imposed Synchronicity An Examination of Time and its Meaning Festiwale nauki z perspektywy publiczności: analiza treści programów wydarzeń Co ze mną zrobisz, choć mnie nie zobaczysz? Afordancje i Noc Kultury Współtworzenie wiedzy i procesy uczenia się w złożonych systemach społecznych. Przypadek współpracy polskich naukowców z podmiotami spoza uniwersytetu
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1